Message ID | 20231011205259.2295032-1-jonathan.cavitt@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | drm/i915: Define and use GuC and CTB TLB invalidation routines | expand |
On 10/12/2023 06:45, Patchwork wrote: > Project List - Patchwork *Patch Details* > *Series:* drm/i915: Define and use GuC and CTB TLB invalidation > routines (rev2) > *URL:* https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/125002/ > *State:* failure > *Details:* > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_125002v2/index.html > > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13746 -> Patchwork_125002v2 > > > Summary > > *FAILURE* > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_125002v2 absolutely need > to be > verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_125002v2, please notify your bug team > (lgci.bug.filing@intel.com) to allow them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives > in CI. > > External URL: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_125002v2/index.html > > > Participating hosts (38 -> 38) > > Additional (1): fi-bsw-n3050 > Missing (1): fi-snb-2520m > > > Possible new issues > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > Patchwork_125002v2: > > > IGT changes > > > Possible regressions > > * > > igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_mocs: > > o bat-mtlp-8: PASS > <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13746/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_mocs.html> > -> DMESG-WARN > <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_125002v2/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_mocs.html> > +1 other test dmesg-warn > * > > igt@i915_selftest@live@guc: > > o > > bat-mtlp-6: PASS > <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13746/bat-mtlp-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@guc.html> > -> DMESG-WARN > <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_125002v2/bat-mtlp-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@guc.html> > +3 other tests dmesg-warn > > o > > bat-mtlp-8: NOTRUN -> DMESG-WARN > <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_125002v2/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live@guc.html> > +1 other test dmesg-warn > These failure all appear to be reset related. However, they are full GT reset not individual engine resets. So not sure they can be explained by the worker thread vs interrupt handler processing issue of the gem_exec_capture failures. I would definitely recommend running these locally when you have the next version of the patch set ready. John.