Message ID | 20241213054610.55843-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | vsprintf: Add %pTN to print Task Name | expand |
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 4:05 PM Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote: > > On Fri 2024-12-13 13:46:04, Yafang Shao wrote: > > Since the task->comm is guaranteed to be NUL-ternimated, we can print it > > directly. Add a new vsnprintf format specifier "%pTN" to print task comm, > > where 'p' represents the task Pointer, 'T' stands for Task, and 'N' denots > > Name. With this abstraction, the user no longer needs to care about > > retrieving task name. > > What is the advantage, please? The advantage is that it provides the flexibility to modify the comm representation to meet future requirements. For instance, we could rename it to "task_name" and increase its size. > > Honestly, I believe that the meaning of > > printk("%s\n", task->comm); > > is much more clear than using a cryptic %pXYZ modifier: > > printk("%pTN\n", task); > > > The %pXYZ modifiers makes sense only when the formatting of the printed > information needs some processing. But this is a plain string. That makes sense to me. > IMHO, it is not worth it. In fact, I believe that it is a > counter productive. Linus, what are your thoughts? -- Regards Yafang