@@ -1336,6 +1336,8 @@ i915_gem_object_unpin_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
void i915_gem_retire_requests(struct drm_device *dev);
void i915_gem_retire_requests_ring(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring);
+int __must_check i915_gem_check_wedge(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+ bool interruptible);
void i915_gem_reset(struct drm_device *dev);
void i915_gem_clflush_object(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
@@ -1863,11 +1863,10 @@ i915_gem_retire_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
}
-static int
-i915_gem_check_wedge(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+int
+i915_gem_check_wedge(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+ bool interruptible)
{
- BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->dev->struct_mutex));
-
if (atomic_read(&dev_priv->mm.wedged)) {
struct completion *x = &dev_priv->error_completion;
bool recovery_complete;
@@ -1878,7 +1877,16 @@ i915_gem_check_wedge(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
recovery_complete = x->done > 0;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&x->wait.lock, flags);
- return recovery_complete ? -EIO : -EAGAIN;
+ /* Non-interruptible callers can't handle -EAGAIN, hence return
+ * -EIO unconditionally for these. */
+ if (!interruptible)
+ return -EIO;
+
+ /* Recovery complete, but still wedged means reset failure. */
+ if (recovery_complete)
+ return -EIO;
+
+ return -EAGAIN;
}
return 0;
@@ -1932,6 +1940,7 @@ static int __wait_seqno(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, u32 seqno,
unsigned long timeout_jiffies;
long end;
bool wait_forever = true;
+ int ret;
if (i915_seqno_passed(ring->get_seqno(ring), seqno))
return 0;
@@ -1963,8 +1972,9 @@ static int __wait_seqno(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, u32 seqno,
end = wait_event_timeout(ring->irq_queue, EXIT_COND,
timeout_jiffies);
- if (atomic_read(&dev_priv->mm.wedged))
- end = -EAGAIN;
+ ret = i915_gem_check_wedge(dev_priv, interruptible);
+ if (ret)
+ end = ret;
} while (end == 0 && wait_forever);
getrawmonotonic(&now);
@@ -2004,7 +2014,7 @@ i915_wait_seqno(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, uint32_t seqno)
BUG_ON(seqno == 0);
- ret = i915_gem_check_wedge(dev_priv);
+ ret = i915_gem_check_wedge(dev_priv, dev_priv->mm.interruptible);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -1228,8 +1228,10 @@ int intel_wait_ring_buffer(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, int n)
}
msleep(1);
- if (atomic_read(&dev_priv->mm.wedged))
- return -EAGAIN;
+
+ ret = i915_gem_check_wedge(dev_priv, dev_priv->mm.interruptible);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
} while (!time_after(jiffies, end));
trace_i915_ring_wait_end(ring);
return -EBUSY;
So don't return -EAGAIN, even in the case of a gpu hang. Remap it to -EIO instead. Note that this isn't really an issue with interruptability, but more that we have quite a few codepaths (mostly around kms stuff) that simply can't handle any errors and hence not even -EAGAIN. Instead of adding proper failure paths so that we could restart these ioctls we've opted for the cheap way out of sleeping non-interruptibly. Which works everywhere but when the gpu dies, which this patch fixes. So essentially interruptible == false means 'wait for the gpu or die trying'.' This patch is a bit ugly because intel_ring_begin is all non-interruptible and hence only returns -EIO. But as the comment in there says, auditing all the callsites would be a pain. To avoid duplicating code, reuse i915_gem_check_wedge in __wait_seqno and intel_wait_ring_buffer. Also use the opportunity to clarify the different cases in i915_gem_check_wedge a bit with comments. v2: Don't access dev_priv->mm.interruptible from check_wedge - we might not hold dev->struct_mutex, making this racy. Instead pass interruptible in as a parameter. I've noticed this because I've hit a BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked) at the top of check_wedge. This has been added in commit b4aca0106c466b5a0329318203f65bac2d91b682 Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Date: Wed Apr 25 20:50:12 2012 -0700 drm/i915: extract some common olr+wedge code although that commit is missing any justification for this. I guess it's just copy&paste, because the same commit add the same BUG_ON check to check_olr, where it indeed makes sense. But in check_wedge everything we access is protected by other means, so this is superflous. And because it now gets in the way (we add a new caller in __wait_seqno, which can be called without dev->struct_mutext) let's just remove it. v3: Group all the i915_gem_check_wedge refactoring into this patch, so that this patch here is all about not returning -EAGAIN to callsites that can't handle syscall restarting. v4: Add clarification what interuptible == fales means in our code, requested by Ben Widawsky. v5: Fix EAGAIN mispell noticed by Chris Wilson. Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++-------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 6 ++++-- 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)