| Message ID | 1342016944-23395-77-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index c8f7f54..91d8560 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -6910,8 +6910,15 @@ bool intel_crtc_set_mode(struct drm_crtc *crtc, intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(connector->encoder->crtc); - if (prepare_pipes & (1 << intel_crtc->pipe)) + if (prepare_pipes & (1 << intel_crtc->pipe)) { + struct drm_property *dpms_property = + dev->mode_config.dpms_property; + connector->dpms = DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON; + drm_connector_property_set_value(connector, + dpms_property, + DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON); + } to_intel_encoder(connector->encoder)->connectors_active = true;
Hopefully this makes userspace slightly less confused about us frobbing the dpms state behind its back. Yeah, it would be better to be more careful with not changing the dpms state, but that is quite more invasive. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)