From patchwork Wed Sep 26 23:15:20 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ben Widawsky X-Patchwork-Id: 1511081 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-intel-gfx@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-process-083081@patchwork2.kernel.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) by patchwork2.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C52DF238 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:15:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1599EF09 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:15:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from shiva.chad-versace.us (209-20-75-48.static.cloud-ips.com [209.20.75.48]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90599E76E for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:15:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by shiva.chad-versace.us (Postfix, from userid 1005) id 945F2885A1; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:16:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on shiva.chad-versace.us X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lundgren.ak.intel.com (fruit.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.190]) by shiva.chad-versace.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8649C88588; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:16:09 +0000 (UTC) From: Ben Widawsky To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:15:20 -0700 Message-Id: <1348701320-28899-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.1 Cc: Ben Widawsky Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix set_caching locking X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+patchwork-intel-gfx=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+patchwork-intel-gfx=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.freedesktop.org On the EINVAL case we don't release struct_mutex. It should be safe to grab the lock after checking the parameters, which also resolves the issues. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index 365a7dc..76bbb37 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c @@ -3218,10 +3218,6 @@ int i915_gem_set_caching_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, enum i915_cache_level level; int ret; - ret = i915_mutex_lock_interruptible(dev); - if (ret) - return ret; - switch (args->caching) { case I915_CACHING_NONE: level = I915_CACHE_NONE; @@ -3233,6 +3229,10 @@ int i915_gem_set_caching_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, return -EINVAL; } + ret = i915_mutex_lock_interruptible(dev); + if (ret) + return ret; + obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(dev, file, args->handle)); if (&obj->base == NULL) { ret = -ENOENT;