Message ID | 1366313746-3659-6-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 04:35:44PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> > > In the error state function we read the registers without checking if > the power well is on, so after doing this we have to clear the > FPGA_DBG_RM_NOCLAIM bit to prevent the next I915_WRITE from detecting > it and printing an error message. > > The first version of this patch was checking for the power well state > and then avoiding reading registers that were off, but the reviewers > requested to just read the registers any way and then later clear the > FPGA_DBG_RM_NOCLAIM bit. > > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 215f76c..43de5ef 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -9585,6 +9585,13 @@ intel_display_capture_error_state(struct drm_device *dev) error->pipe[i].vsync = I915_READ(VSYNC(cpu_transcoder)); } + /* In the code above we read the registers without checking if the power + * well was on, so here we have to clear the FPGA_DBG_RM_NOCLAIM bit to + * prevent the next I915_WRITE from detecting it and printing an error + * message. */ + if (HAS_POWER_WELL(dev)) + I915_WRITE_NOTRACE(FPGA_DBG, FPGA_DBG_RM_NOCLAIM); + return error; }