| Message ID | 1375374088-1792-1-git-send-email-lekensteyn@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 06:21:28PM +0200, Peter Wu wrote: > Since commit 29a241c (ACPICA: Add argument typechecking for all > predefined ACPI names), _DSM parameters are validated which trigger the > following warning: > > ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95) > ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95) > ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95) > ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95) > > As the Intel _DSM method seems to ignore this parameter, let's comply to > the ACPI spec and use a Package instead. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com> > --- > What is this code useful for? It seems unfinished, all it does it > printing some information when a mux is available, but besides that > there is no interaction with the driver. Dunno how it all works exactly, but yours is not the only report: Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32602 Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c index bcbbaea..57fe1ae 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static const u8 intel_dsm_guid[] = { 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c }; -static int intel_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg) +static int intel_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func) { struct acpi_buffer output = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL }; struct acpi_object_list input; @@ -46,8 +46,9 @@ static int intel_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg) params[1].integer.value = INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID; params[2].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER; params[2].integer.value = func; - params[3].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER; - params[3].integer.value = arg; + params[3].type = ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE; + params[3].package.count = 0; + params[3].package.elements = NULL; ret = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_DSM", &input, &output); if (ret) { @@ -151,8 +152,9 @@ static void intel_dsm_platform_mux_info(void) params[1].integer.value = INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID; params[2].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER; params[2].integer.value = INTEL_DSM_FN_PLATFORM_MUX_INFO; - params[3].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER; - params[3].integer.value = 0; + params[3].type = ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE; + params[3].package.count = 0; + params[3].package.elements = NULL; ret = acpi_evaluate_object(intel_dsm_priv.dhandle, "_DSM", &input, &output); @@ -205,7 +207,7 @@ static bool intel_dsm_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev) return false; } - ret = intel_dsm(dhandle, INTEL_DSM_FN_SUPPORTED_FUNCTIONS, 0); + ret = intel_dsm(dhandle, INTEL_DSM_FN_SUPPORTED_FUNCTIONS); if (ret < 0) { DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to get supported _DSM functions\n"); return false;
Since commit 29a241c (ACPICA: Add argument typechecking for all predefined ACPI names), _DSM parameters are validated which trigger the following warning: ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95) ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95) ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95) ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95) As the Intel _DSM method seems to ignore this parameter, let's comply to the ACPI spec and use a Package instead. Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com> --- What is this code useful for? It seems unfinished, all it does it printing some information when a mux is available, but besides that there is no interaction with the driver. --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c | 14 ++++++++------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)