From patchwork Wed Nov 27 10:15:53 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Daniel Vetter X-Patchwork-Id: 3247291 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-intel-gfx@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork1.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.19.201]) by patchwork1.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B6B9F3B8 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:35:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F842053F for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F5A20360 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D5FFB054; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 02:35:26 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mail-ea0-f176.google.com (mail-ea0-f176.google.com [209.85.215.176]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993CDFB054 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 02:35:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ea0-f176.google.com with SMTP id h14so4535149eaj.35 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 02:35:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=50OOJEdchiXBerw1ZTtRPmMafevqyZ75ajYuQHthyKk=; b=XDzKbCfDI/qsLP4u8GcuDC9Fv2ci/664d6XU5aPpKVTh5g9S9NlwK7xSsUnodHk1eB yCoRoPwT9nnI19Y8aqoP/LnOWdbCLZYmyJXU8AYREzItMUikzLE2DYxEOIyr/VNEbne9 uTcgxL2/aDzau9ljWAWtc75eCh7tGGwwKWM8s= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=50OOJEdchiXBerw1ZTtRPmMafevqyZ75ajYuQHthyKk=; b=IW0uplA1oiJOsQaKkiDaRZNDmx7aRWYYGvtCtQXGswkGc203ily3AbtvJS8O0CE4lN FDQMJb6bYK6HvoZQIjdZjoELfHjkToU9iT8Z0QB3hH+JpszJzlyGwopEUwonPZzsUKB/ iHE4Rfjdln4EAvuNggHG4rL/Fv/bR+GEc6zXChmK8E59x4r+vaocOrXWgLR0Mv8pUeIa /bmu1F82eGMYDNcxmuNn12lo5ANiSCkGp9DZJWx4oAYzGklm3XVvvLYYWJip0rhx6mlq lBvAm7dUCahR5D3yh5X2Z59gHzXrgJ+PnvHOk7RW2Ini6JjllnuOTt9IUBN4wSwAj7lW k72A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkLF44ekD36ksvG7oI/1/HHWRU7edbPLSlujeebv0AmTgsk+p5oLCf2d+Nnl4NN1e3TcH5i X-Received: by 10.14.69.200 with SMTP id n48mr1512074eed.54.1385548523662; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 02:35:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from wespe.ffwll.local (178-83-130-250.dynamic.hispeed.ch. [178.83.130.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w6sm18132010eeo.12.2013.11.27.02.35.22 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Nov 2013 02:35:22 -0800 (PST) From: Daniel Vetter To: Intel Graphics Development Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:15:53 +0100 Message-Id: <1385547353-7537-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.1.4 Cc: Daniel Vetter Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests: Document per-ring naming conventions X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Inspired by the recent pile of tests for the CS, which doesn't split up the tests into per-ring subtests. Cc: bradley.d.volkin@intel.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- tests/NAMING-CONVENTION | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/NAMING-CONVENTION b/tests/NAMING-CONVENTION index f08e2828022a..8fc6548db067 100644 --- a/tests/NAMING-CONVENTION +++ b/tests/NAMING-CONVENTION @@ -61,3 +61,7 @@ machine isn't configured properly there should be a first subtest to just check for that. ctx: Tests that exercise the hw context support. + +render/blt/bsd/vebox: Tests which apply to individual rings should use these +suffixes. They're a bit inconsistent and historically grown, but they new Bspec +names (RCS, BCS, VCS and VECS) aren't really clearer.