Message ID | 1390969547-1018-3-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
hehehe I liked the title! :) Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com> wrote: > It wasn't ever used by the caller anyway with the exception of what we > show in sysfs. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > index bcbdac2..258241b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > @@ -3161,7 +3161,7 @@ int intel_enable_rc6(const struct drm_device *dev) > if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen == 5) > return 0; > > - if (IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev) || IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) > + if (IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev)) > return (INTEL_RC6_ENABLE | INTEL_RC6p_ENABLE); > else > return INTEL_RC6_ENABLE; > -- > 1.8.5.3 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Ben Widawsky > <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com <mailto:benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>> wrote: > > It wasn't ever used by the caller anyway with the exception of what we > show in sysfs. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net <mailto:ben@bwidawsk.net>> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > index bcbdac2..258241b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > @@ -3161,7 +3161,7 @@ int intel_enable_rc6(const struct drm_device *dev) > if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen == 5) > return 0; > > - if (IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev) || IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) > + if (IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev)) > return (INTEL_RC6_ENABLE | INTEL_RC6p_ENABLE); > else > return INTEL_RC6_ENABLE; > -- > 1.8.5.3 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org <mailto:Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx I think, we can avoid else condition and return INTEL_RC6_ENABLE if the other platform checks fails? Reviewed-by: Deepak S <deepak.s@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c index bcbdac2..258241b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -3161,7 +3161,7 @@ int intel_enable_rc6(const struct drm_device *dev) if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen == 5) return 0; - if (IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev) || IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) + if (IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev)) return (INTEL_RC6_ENABLE | INTEL_RC6p_ENABLE); else return INTEL_RC6_ENABLE;
It wasn't ever used by the caller anyway with the exception of what we show in sysfs. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)