From patchwork Fri Jul 11 17:30:18 2014 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Rodrigo Vivi X-Patchwork-Id: 4538441 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-intel-gfx@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork1.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.19.201]) by patchwork1.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05389F4F5 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 00:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC7820272 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 00:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4865202E9 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 00:28:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B9D8A26D; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 17:28:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21406E220 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 17:28:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jul 2014 17:28:39 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,646,1400050800"; d="scan'208";a="542272166" Received: from di-604.jf.intel.com (HELO rdvivi-hillsboro.jf.intel.com) ([10.7.201.28]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jul 2014 17:28:35 -0700 From: Rodrigo Vivi To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 10:30:18 -0700 Message-Id: <1405099819-11119-10-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.3 In-Reply-To: <1405099819-11119-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> References: <1405099819-11119-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter , Rodrigo Vivi Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: Remove redundant HAS_PSR checks X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Daniel Vetter We only need to check for this in psr_enable, everything else is already protect by the dev_priv->psr.enabled checks. Those need the psr locking, but these functions are called infrequent enough that the locking overhead is negligible. Suggested by Chris Wilson. Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi Cc: Chris Wilson Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 14 -------------- 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c index a8f8d00..5498e12 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c @@ -1805,11 +1805,6 @@ static bool intel_edp_psr_match_conditions(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) dev_priv->psr.source_ok = false; - if (!HAS_PSR(dev)) { - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR not supported on this platform\n"); - return false; - } - if (IS_HASWELL(dev) && dig_port->port != PORT_A) { DRM_DEBUG_KMS("HSW ties PSR to DDI A (eDP)\n"); return false; @@ -1896,9 +1891,6 @@ void intel_edp_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp); struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; - if (!HAS_PSR(dev)) - return; - mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled) { mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); @@ -1973,9 +1965,6 @@ void intel_edp_psr_invalidate(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_crtc *crtc; enum pipe pipe; - if (!HAS_PSR(dev)) - return; - mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled) { mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); @@ -2000,9 +1989,6 @@ void intel_edp_psr_flush(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_crtc *crtc; enum pipe pipe; - if (!HAS_PSR(dev)) - return; - mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled) { mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);