Message ID | 1408561471-15812-1-git-send-email-vedang.patel@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:04:31PM -0700, vedang.patel@intel.com wrote: > From: Vedang Patel <vedang.patel@intel.com> > > The patch introduces fixes for the debugfs attributes emitted by > the i915 driver for GEN8. Currently, it is not emitting the correct > attributes which include the status of RC6 states. > > Change-Id: Ib2068a0cac9a5wq3f228e547fa1a097ad369d242df > Signed-off-by: Vedang Patel <vedang.patel@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > index 850fa59..2296a22 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > @@ -1329,7 +1329,7 @@ static int i915_drpc_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) > > if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) > return vlv_drpc_info(m); > - else if (IS_GEN6(dev) || IS_GEN7(dev)) > + else if (IS_GEN6(dev) || IS_GEN7(dev) || IS_GEN8(dev)) I think an INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6 check here looks better and is more future proof. Can you please update the patch accordingly? Thanks, Daniel > return gen6_drpc_info(m); > else > return ironlake_drpc_info(m); > -- > 1.7.9.5 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c index 850fa59..2296a22 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c @@ -1329,7 +1329,7 @@ static int i915_drpc_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) return vlv_drpc_info(m); - else if (IS_GEN6(dev) || IS_GEN7(dev)) + else if (IS_GEN6(dev) || IS_GEN7(dev) || IS_GEN8(dev)) return gen6_drpc_info(m); else return ironlake_drpc_info(m);