diff mbox

[6/7] drm/i915: VLV/CHV PSR: Increase wait delay time before active PSR.

Message ID 1425086767-1016-6-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Rodrigo Vivi Feb. 28, 2015, 1:26 a.m. UTC
Since active function on VLV immediately activate PSR let's give more
time for idleness.

v2: Rebase over intel_psr.c and fix typo.
v3: Revival: Manual tests indicated that this is needed. With a short delay
    there is a huge risk of getting blank screens when planes are being enabled.
v4: Revival 2 with reasonable delay. 1/2 sec instead of 5. VBT is 10 sec but
    actually time for link training what we aren't doing, but with only 100 sec
    in some cases kms_psr_sink_crc manual was showing blank screen,
    so let's use this for now. Also changed comment by a FIXME.

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

durgadoss.r@intel.com March 16, 2015, 5:15 a.m. UTC | #1
>-----Original Message-----

>From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Rodrigo Vivi

>Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 6:56 AM

>To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

>Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo

>Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: VLV/CHV PSR: Increase wait delay time before active PSR.

>

>Since active function on VLV immediately activate PSR let's give more

>time for idleness.

>

>v2: Rebase over intel_psr.c and fix typo.

>v3: Revival: Manual tests indicated that this is needed. With a short delay

>    there is a huge risk of getting blank screens when planes are being enabled.

>v4: Revival 2 with reasonable delay. 1/2 sec instead of 5. VBT is 10 sec but

>    actually time for link training what we aren't doing, but with only 100 sec

>    in some cases kms_psr_sink_crc manual was showing blank screen,

>    so let's use this for now. Also changed comment by a FIXME.

>


Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>


Thanks,
Durga

>Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

>---

> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 8 +++++++-

> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

>

>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c

>index c1ca923..3c1d2b3 100644

>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c

>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c

>@@ -648,6 +648,12 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_device *dev,

> 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;

> 	struct drm_crtc *crtc;

> 	enum pipe pipe;

>+	/* FIXME: kms_psr_sink_crc in manual mode shows black screen on

>+	 * the very first primary plane enabling. W/A is to delay

>+	 * the activate a bit more. On regular use 100 would be enough and

>+	 * better for good power savings.

>+	 */

>+	int delay = msecs_to_jiffies(HAS_DDI(dev) ? 100 : 500);

>

> 	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);

> 	if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled) {

>@@ -680,7 +686,7 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_device *dev,

>

> 	if (!dev_priv->psr.active && !dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits)

> 		schedule_delayed_work(&dev_priv->psr.work,

>-				      msecs_to_jiffies(100));

>+				      msecs_to_jiffies(delay));

> 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);

> }

>

>--

>1.9.3

>

>_______________________________________________

>Intel-gfx mailing list

>Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

>http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index c1ca923..3c1d2b3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -648,6 +648,12 @@  void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_device *dev,
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
 	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
 	enum pipe pipe;
+	/* FIXME: kms_psr_sink_crc in manual mode shows black screen on
+	 * the very first primary plane enabling. W/A is to delay
+	 * the activate a bit more. On regular use 100 would be enough and
+	 * better for good power savings.
+	 */
+	int delay = msecs_to_jiffies(HAS_DDI(dev) ? 100 : 500);
 
 	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
 	if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
@@ -680,7 +686,7 @@  void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_device *dev,
 
 	if (!dev_priv->psr.active && !dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits)
 		schedule_delayed_work(&dev_priv->psr.work,
-				      msecs_to_jiffies(100));
+				      msecs_to_jiffies(delay));
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
 }