Message ID | 1433286146-19288-1-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang.he@intel.com)
Task id: 6527
-------------------------------------Summary-------------------------------------
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
PNV 276/276 276/276
ILK 303/303 303/303
SNB -1 315/315 314/315
IVB 343/343 343/343
BYT 287/287 287/287
BDW 321/321 321/321
-------------------------------------Detailed-------------------------------------
Platform Test drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
*SNB igt@pm_rpm@dpms-mode-unset-non-lpsp PASS(1) DMESG_WARN(1)
(dmesg patch applied)WARNING:at_drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:#assert_device_not_suspended[i915]()@WARNING:.* at .* assert_device_not_suspended+0x
Note: You need to pay more attention to line start with '*'
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015, Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com> wrote: > in > commit 65ca7514e21adbee25b8175fc909759c735d00ff > Author: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> > Date: Mon Feb 9 19:33:22 2015 +0000 > > drm/i915/skl: Implement WaBarrierPerformanceFixDisable > > The workaround ended up in the chv workarounds. Not sure what the reason or > history of that is, but it /seems/ wrong. Don't know if this fixes anything > since I have many other problems with my platform. > > Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> > Cc: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Ville beat you to it [1]. However he put it in skl workarounds, not gen9, so I'm presuming this does not apply to bxt. BR, Jani. [1] http://mid.gmane.org/1433248657-4509-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 14 +++++++------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > index d934f85..0fd6033d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > @@ -901,13 +901,6 @@ static int chv_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) > GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK, > GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4); > > - if (INTEL_REVID(dev) == SKL_REVID_C0 || > - INTEL_REVID(dev) == SKL_REVID_D0) > - /* WaBarrierPerformanceFixDisable:skl */ > - WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(HDC_CHICKEN0, > - HDC_FENCE_DEST_SLM_DISABLE | > - HDC_BARRIER_PERFORMANCE_DISABLE); > - > return 0; > } > > @@ -972,6 +965,13 @@ static int gen9_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) > tmp |= HDC_FORCE_CSR_NON_COHERENT_OVR_DISABLE; > WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(HDC_CHICKEN0, tmp); > > + if (INTEL_REVID(dev) == SKL_REVID_C0 || > + INTEL_REVID(dev) == SKL_REVID_D0) > + /* WaBarrierPerformanceFixDisable:skl */ > + WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(HDC_CHICKEN0, > + HDC_FENCE_DEST_SLM_DISABLE | > + HDC_BARRIER_PERFORMANCE_DISABLE); > + > return 0; > } > > -- > 2.4.2 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 09:49:43 +0300 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Wed, 03 Jun 2015, Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com> wrote: > > in > > commit 65ca7514e21adbee25b8175fc909759c735d00ff > > Author: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> > > Date: Mon Feb 9 19:33:22 2015 +0000 > > > > drm/i915/skl: Implement WaBarrierPerformanceFixDisable > > > > The workaround ended up in the chv workarounds. Not sure what the > > reason or history of that is, but it /seems/ wrong. Don't know if > > this fixes anything since I have many other problems with my > > platform. > > > > Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> > > Cc: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> > > Ville beat you to it [1]. However he put it in skl workarounds, not > gen9, so I'm presuming this does not apply to bxt. > > BR, > Jani. > > Anyone who will talk to us and tells you they know the answer to that definitively is lying. My patch is wrong though. Checking only the REVID without checking IS_SKYLAKE is not the right thing to do. Consider Ville's patch Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> (I no longer subscribe to intel-gfx, so actually adding my review is kind of a pain). > [1] > http://mid.gmane.org/1433248657-4509-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com > > > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 14 +++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index d934f85..0fd6033d > > 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > > @@ -901,13 +901,6 @@ static int chv_init_workarounds(struct > > intel_engine_cs *ring) GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK, > > GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4); > > > > - if (INTEL_REVID(dev) == SKL_REVID_C0 || > > - INTEL_REVID(dev) == SKL_REVID_D0) > > - /* WaBarrierPerformanceFixDisable:skl */ > > - WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(HDC_CHICKEN0, > > - HDC_FENCE_DEST_SLM_DISABLE | > > - HDC_BARRIER_PERFORMANCE_DISABLE); > > - > > return 0; > > } > > > > @@ -972,6 +965,13 @@ static int gen9_init_workarounds(struct > > intel_engine_cs *ring) tmp |= > > HDC_FORCE_CSR_NON_COHERENT_OVR_DISABLE; > > WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(HDC_CHICKEN0, tmp); > > + if (INTEL_REVID(dev) == SKL_REVID_C0 || > > + INTEL_REVID(dev) == SKL_REVID_D0) > > + /* WaBarrierPerformanceFixDisable:skl */ > > + WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(HDC_CHICKEN0, > > + HDC_FENCE_DEST_SLM_DISABLE | > > + HDC_BARRIER_PERFORMANCE_DISABLE); > > + > > return 0; > > } > > > > -- > > 2.4.2 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx >
On 03/06/2015 00:02, Widawsky, Benjamin wrote: Probably should have a line like: Problem introduced in: instead of just 'in' > in > commit 65ca7514e21adbee25b8175fc909759c735d00ff > Author: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> > Date: Mon Feb 9 19:33:22 2015 +0000 > > drm/i915/skl: Implement WaBarrierPerformanceFixDisable > > The workaround ended up in the chv workarounds. Not sure what the reason or > history of that is, but it /seems/ wrong. Don't know if this fixes anything patch doesn't always get it right... Reviewed-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com> > since I have many other problems with my platform. > > Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> > Cc: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 14 +++++++------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > index d934f85..0fd6033d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > @@ -901,13 +901,6 @@ static int chv_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) > GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK, > GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4); > > - if (INTEL_REVID(dev) == SKL_REVID_C0 || > - INTEL_REVID(dev) == SKL_REVID_D0) > - /* WaBarrierPerformanceFixDisable:skl */ > - WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(HDC_CHICKEN0, > - HDC_FENCE_DEST_SLM_DISABLE | > - HDC_BARRIER_PERFORMANCE_DISABLE); > - > return 0; > } > > @@ -972,6 +965,13 @@ static int gen9_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) > tmp |= HDC_FORCE_CSR_NON_COHERENT_OVR_DISABLE; > WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(HDC_CHICKEN0, tmp); > > + if (INTEL_REVID(dev) == SKL_REVID_C0 || > + INTEL_REVID(dev) == SKL_REVID_D0) > + /* WaBarrierPerformanceFixDisable:skl */ > + WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(HDC_CHICKEN0, > + HDC_FENCE_DEST_SLM_DISABLE | > + HDC_BARRIER_PERFORMANCE_DISABLE); > + > return 0; > } > >
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015, Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com> wrote: > On 03/06/2015 00:02, Widawsky, Benjamin wrote: > > Probably should have a line like: > Problem introduced in: > instead of just 'in' > >> in >> commit 65ca7514e21adbee25b8175fc909759c735d00ff >> Author: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> >> Date: Mon Feb 9 19:33:22 2015 +0000 >> >> drm/i915/skl: Implement WaBarrierPerformanceFixDisable >> >> The workaround ended up in the chv workarounds. Not sure what the reason or >> history of that is, but it /seems/ wrong. Don't know if this fixes anything > > patch doesn't always get it right... > > Reviewed-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com> Already pushed Ville's patch http://mid.gmane.org/1433248657-4509-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com BR, Jani. > >> since I have many other problems with my platform. >> >> Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> >> Cc: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com> >> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 14 +++++++------- >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c >> index d934f85..0fd6033d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c >> @@ -901,13 +901,6 @@ static int chv_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) >> GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK, >> GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4); >> >> - if (INTEL_REVID(dev) == SKL_REVID_C0 || >> - INTEL_REVID(dev) == SKL_REVID_D0) >> - /* WaBarrierPerformanceFixDisable:skl */ >> - WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(HDC_CHICKEN0, >> - HDC_FENCE_DEST_SLM_DISABLE | >> - HDC_BARRIER_PERFORMANCE_DISABLE); >> - >> return 0; >> } >> >> @@ -972,6 +965,13 @@ static int gen9_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) >> tmp |= HDC_FORCE_CSR_NON_COHERENT_OVR_DISABLE; >> WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(HDC_CHICKEN0, tmp); >> >> + if (INTEL_REVID(dev) == SKL_REVID_C0 || >> + INTEL_REVID(dev) == SKL_REVID_D0) >> + /* WaBarrierPerformanceFixDisable:skl */ >> + WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(HDC_CHICKEN0, >> + HDC_FENCE_DEST_SLM_DISABLE | >> + HDC_BARRIER_PERFORMANCE_DISABLE); >> + >> return 0; >> } >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index d934f85..0fd6033d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c @@ -901,13 +901,6 @@ static int chv_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK, GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4); - if (INTEL_REVID(dev) == SKL_REVID_C0 || - INTEL_REVID(dev) == SKL_REVID_D0) - /* WaBarrierPerformanceFixDisable:skl */ - WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(HDC_CHICKEN0, - HDC_FENCE_DEST_SLM_DISABLE | - HDC_BARRIER_PERFORMANCE_DISABLE); - return 0; } @@ -972,6 +965,13 @@ static int gen9_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) tmp |= HDC_FORCE_CSR_NON_COHERENT_OVR_DISABLE; WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(HDC_CHICKEN0, tmp); + if (INTEL_REVID(dev) == SKL_REVID_C0 || + INTEL_REVID(dev) == SKL_REVID_D0) + /* WaBarrierPerformanceFixDisable:skl */ + WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(HDC_CHICKEN0, + HDC_FENCE_DEST_SLM_DISABLE | + HDC_BARRIER_PERFORMANCE_DISABLE); + return 0; }
in commit 65ca7514e21adbee25b8175fc909759c735d00ff Author: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Date: Mon Feb 9 19:33:22 2015 +0000 drm/i915/skl: Implement WaBarrierPerformanceFixDisable The workaround ended up in the chv workarounds. Not sure what the reason or history of that is, but it /seems/ wrong. Don't know if this fixes anything since I have many other problems with my platform. Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Cc: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)