From patchwork Wed Jul 8 20:45:48 2015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ville Syrjala X-Patchwork-Id: 6751241 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-intel-gfx@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork2.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.136]) by patchwork2.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC535C05AC for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 20:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D72620668 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 20:46:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4548E20607 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 20:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F256EAD7; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 13:46:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1076EAD7 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 13:46:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Jul 2015 13:46:24 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,434,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="725292552" Received: from stinkbox.fi.intel.com (HELO stinkbox) ([10.237.72.88]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 08 Jul 2015 13:46:21 -0700 Received: by stinkbox (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 08 Jul 2015 23:46:07 +0300 From: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 23:45:48 +0300 Message-Id: <1436388361-11130-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.3.6 In-Reply-To: <1436388361-11130-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> References: <1436388361-11130-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "Deepak S"@freedesktop.org, deepak.s@intel.com Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/15] drm/i915: Always program unique transition scale for CHV X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Ville Syrjälä The docs give you the impression that the unique transition scale value shouldn't matter when unique transition scale is enabled. But as Imre found on BXT (and I verfied also on BSW) the value does matter. So from now on just program the same value 0x9a always. Cc: Imre Deak Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä Reviewed-by: Deepak S --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c | 30 +++++++++++----------- 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c index f424833..32d7e43 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c @@ -3142,6 +3142,12 @@ static uint32_t vlv_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) return 0; } +static bool chv_need_uniq_trans_scale(uint8_t train_set) +{ + return (train_set & DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPHASIS_MASK) == DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_0 && + (train_set & DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_MASK) == DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_3; +} + static uint32_t chv_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) { struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp); @@ -3260,41 +3266,34 @@ static uint32_t chv_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) /* Program swing margin */ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_TX_DW2(ch, i)); + val &= ~DPIO_SWING_MARGIN000_MASK; val |= margin_reg_value << DPIO_SWING_MARGIN000_SHIFT; + + /* + * Supposedly this value shouldn't matter when unique transition + * scale is disabled, but in fact it does matter. Let's just + * always program the same value and hope it's OK. + */ + val &= ~(0xff << DPIO_UNIQ_TRANS_SCALE_SHIFT); + val |= 0x9a << DPIO_UNIQ_TRANS_SCALE_SHIFT; + vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_TX_DW2(ch, i), val); } - /* Disable unique transition scale */ + /* + * The document said it needs to set bit 27 for ch0 and bit 26 + * for ch1. Might be a typo in the doc. + * For now, for this unique transition scale selection, set bit + * 27 for ch0 and ch1. + */ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_TX_DW3(ch, i)); - val &= ~DPIO_TX_UNIQ_TRANS_SCALE_EN; - vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_TX_DW3(ch, i), val); - } - - if (((train_set & DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPHASIS_MASK) - == DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_0) && - ((train_set & DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_MASK) - == DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_3)) { - - /* - * The document said it needs to set bit 27 for ch0 and bit 26 - * for ch1. Might be a typo in the doc. - * For now, for this unique transition scale selection, set bit - * 27 for ch0 and ch1. - */ - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { - val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_TX_DW3(ch, i)); + if (chv_need_uniq_trans_scale(train_set)) val |= DPIO_TX_UNIQ_TRANS_SCALE_EN; - vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_TX_DW3(ch, i), val); - } - - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { - val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_TX_DW2(ch, i)); - val &= ~(0xff << DPIO_UNIQ_TRANS_SCALE_SHIFT); - val |= (0x9a << DPIO_UNIQ_TRANS_SCALE_SHIFT); - vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_TX_DW2(ch, i), val); - } + else + val &= ~DPIO_TX_UNIQ_TRANS_SCALE_EN; + vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_TX_DW3(ch, i), val); } /* Start swing calculation */ diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c index ba845f7..9f79afb 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c @@ -1846,31 +1846,33 @@ static void chv_hdmi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder) for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_TX_DW2(ch, i)); + val &= ~DPIO_SWING_MARGIN000_MASK; val |= 102 << DPIO_SWING_MARGIN000_SHIFT; + + /* + * Supposedly this value shouldn't matter when unique transition + * scale is disabled, but in fact it does matter. Let's just + * always program the same value and hope it's OK. + */ + val &= ~(0xff << DPIO_UNIQ_TRANS_SCALE_SHIFT); + val |= 0x9a << DPIO_UNIQ_TRANS_SCALE_SHIFT; + vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_TX_DW2(ch, i), val); } - /* Disable unique transition scale */ + /* + * The document said it needs to set bit 27 for ch0 and bit 26 + * for ch1. Might be a typo in the doc. + * For now, for this unique transition scale selection, set bit + * 27 for ch0 and ch1. + */ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_TX_DW3(ch, i)); val &= ~DPIO_TX_UNIQ_TRANS_SCALE_EN; vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_TX_DW3(ch, i), val); } - /* Additional steps for 1200mV-0dB */ -#if 0 - val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_TX_DW3(ch)); - if (ch) - val |= DPIO_TX_UNIQ_TRANS_SCALE_CH1; - else - val |= DPIO_TX_UNIQ_TRANS_SCALE_CH0; - vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_TX_DW3(ch), val); - - vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_TX_DW2(ch), - vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_TX_DW2(ch)) | - (0x9a << DPIO_UNIQ_TRANS_SCALE_SHIFT)); -#endif /* Start swing calculation */ val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_PCS01_DW10(ch)); val |= DPIO_PCS_SWING_CALC_TX0_TX2 | DPIO_PCS_SWING_CALC_TX1_TX3;