| Message ID | 1479664226-22307-1-git-send-email-sunil.kamath@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 23:20 +0530, sunil.kamath@intel.com wrote: > From: "A.Sunil Kamath" <sunil.kamath@intel.com> > > Better to use num_scaler itself while printing scaler_info. > This fixes a bug of printing information for the missing > second scaler on pipe C for SKL platform. > > Signed-off-by: A.Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > index 1cc971c..6c39881 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > @@ -3081,7 +3081,7 @@ static void intel_scaler_info(struct seq_file *m, struct > intel_crtc *intel_crtc) > pipe_config->scaler_state.scaler_users, > pipe_config->scaler_state.scaler_id); > > - for (i = 0; i < SKL_NUM_SCALERS; i++) { > + for (i = 0; i < num_scalers; i++) { > struct intel_scaler *sc = > &pipe_config- > >scaler_state.scalers[i]; >
On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 18:16 +0000, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/15621/ > State : success > > == Summary == > > Series 15621v1 drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/15621/revisions/1/mbox/ > > > fi-bdw-5557u total:244 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:15 > fi-bsw-n3050 total:244 pass:204 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40 > fi-byt-j1900 total:244 pass:216 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 > fi-byt-n2820 total:244 pass:212 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32 > fi-hsw-4770 total:244 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 > fi-hsw-4770r total:244 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 > fi-ilk-650 total:244 pass:191 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:53 > fi-ivb-3520m total:244 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22 > fi-ivb-3770 total:244 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22 > fi-kbl-7200u total:244 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22 > fi-skl-6260u total:244 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14 > fi-skl-6700hq total:244 pass:223 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 > fi-skl-6700k total:244 pass:222 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 > fi-skl-6770hq total:244 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14 > fi-snb-2520m total:244 pass:212 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32 > fi-snb-2600 total:244 pass:211 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:33 > > accd56d36a298219042d84ba9ee1b7bd66d1936c drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-11m-18d-22h- > 35m-31s UTC integration manifest > da14388 drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs > > == Logs == > > For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_3064/ Pushed. Thankd for the patch. Ander
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c index 1cc971c..6c39881 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c @@ -3081,7 +3081,7 @@ static void intel_scaler_info(struct seq_file *m, struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc) pipe_config->scaler_state.scaler_users, pipe_config->scaler_state.scaler_id); - for (i = 0; i < SKL_NUM_SCALERS; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < num_scalers; i++) { struct intel_scaler *sc = &pipe_config->scaler_state.scalers[i];