From patchwork Thu Jun 8 20:41:03 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Navare, Manasi" X-Patchwork-Id: 9776447 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C038601C3 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 20:35:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4B3283DA for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 20:35:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 324D8285D1; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 20:35:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C76D8283DA for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 20:35:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542616E525; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 20:35:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2D486E523 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 20:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Jun 2017 13:35:31 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,315,1493708400"; d="scan'208";a="96078311" Received: from labuser-z97x-ud5h.jf.intel.com ([10.7.199.62]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Jun 2017 13:35:30 -0700 From: Manasi Navare To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 13:41:03 -0700 Message-Id: <1496954463-18038-2-git-send-email-manasi.d.navare@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4 In-Reply-To: <1496954463-18038-1-git-send-email-manasi.d.navare@intel.com> References: <1496954463-18038-1-git-send-email-manasi.d.navare@intel.com> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915/dp: Validate the compliance test link parameters X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Validate the compliance test link parameters when the compliance test dpcd registers are read. Also validate them in compute_config before using them since the max values might have been reduced due to link training fallback. If either the link rate or lane count is invalid, we still bail from using the test parameters since the combination would not work and instead use the fallback values. v2: * Added commit message to explain why we still bail when either of of the params is invalid (Ville Syrjala) * Add reason for validating in the comment (Jani Nikula) * Also check if index >= 0 after validating (Jani Nikula) Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare Cc: Jani Nikula Cc: Ville Syrjala --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c index dd01ab8..23dbdef 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c @@ -1678,12 +1678,18 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder, if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) { int index; - index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates, - intel_dp->num_common_rates, - intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate); - if (index >= 0) - min_clock = max_clock = index; - min_lane_count = max_lane_count = intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count; + /* Validate the compliance test data since max values + * might have changed due to link train fallback. + */ + if (intel_dp_link_params_valid(intel_dp, intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate, + intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count)) { + index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates, + intel_dp->num_common_rates, + intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate); + if (index >= 0) + min_clock = max_clock = index; + min_lane_count = max_lane_count = intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count; + } } DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP link computation with max lane count %i " "max bw %d pixel clock %iKHz\n", @@ -3961,8 +3967,7 @@ intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 *sink_irq_vector) static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_link_training(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) { int status = 0; - int min_lane_count = 1; - int link_rate_index, test_link_rate; + int test_link_rate; uint8_t test_lane_count, test_link_bw; /* (DP CTS 1.2) * 4.3.1.11 @@ -3976,10 +3981,6 @@ static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_link_training(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) return DP_TEST_NAK; } test_lane_count &= DP_MAX_LANE_COUNT_MASK; - /* Validate the requested lane count */ - if (test_lane_count < min_lane_count || - test_lane_count > intel_dp->max_link_lane_count) - return DP_TEST_NAK; status = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_LINK_RATE, &test_link_bw); @@ -3987,12 +3988,11 @@ static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_link_training(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Rate read failed\n"); return DP_TEST_NAK; } - /* Validate the requested link rate */ test_link_rate = drm_dp_bw_code_to_link_rate(test_link_bw); - link_rate_index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates, - intel_dp->num_common_rates, - test_link_rate); - if (link_rate_index < 0) + + /* Validate the requested link rate and lane count */ + if (!intel_dp_link_params_valid(intel_dp, test_link_rate, + test_lane_count)) return DP_TEST_NAK; intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count = test_lane_count;