From patchwork Wed May 2 06:50:19 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" X-Patchwork-Id: 10375021 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82146053D for ; Wed, 2 May 2018 06:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79F328BC5 for ; Wed, 2 May 2018 06:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 9C79028C6A; Wed, 2 May 2018 06:58:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C53928BC5 for ; Wed, 2 May 2018 06:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC086E504; Wed, 2 May 2018 06:58:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 857376E51B; Wed, 2 May 2018 06:58:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 May 2018 23:58:34 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,354,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="196029542" Received: from ankit-desktop.iind.intel.com ([10.223.161.2]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 May 2018 23:58:32 -0700 From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 12:20:19 +0530 Message-Id: <1525243822-19308-8-git-send-email-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1525243822-19308-1-git-send-email-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> References: <1525243822-19308-1-git-send-email-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v13 07/10] drm: Handle aspect ratio info in legacy modeset path X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ppaalanen@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Ankit Nautiyal If the user-space does not support aspect-ratio, and requests for a modeset with mode having aspect ratio bits set, then the given user-mode must be rejected. Secondly, while preparing a user-mode from kernel mode, the aspect-ratio info must not be given, if aspect-ratio is not supported by the user. This patch: 1. rejects the modes with aspect-ratio info, during modeset, if the user does not support aspect ratio. 2. does not load the aspect-ratio info in user-mode structure, if aspect ratio is not supported. 3. adds helper functions for determining if aspect-ratio is expected in user-mode and for allowing/disallowing the aspect-ratio, if its not expected. Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal V3: Addressed review comments from Ville: Do not corrupt the current crtc state by updating aspect-ratio on the fly. V4: rebase V5: As suggested by Ville, rejected the modeset calls for modes with aspect ratio, if the user does not set aspect-ratio cap. V6: Used the helper functions for determining if aspect-ratio is expected in the user-mode. V7: rebase V8: rebase V9: rebase V10: Modified the commit-message V11: rebase V12: Merged the patch for adding aspect-ratio helper functions with this patch. V13: Minor modifications as suggested by Ville. --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 8 +++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_internal.h | 6 +++++ drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c index a231dd5..98323f4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c @@ -449,6 +449,7 @@ int drm_mode_getcrtc(struct drm_device *dev, crtc_resp->mode_valid = 0; } } + drm_mode_filter_aspect_ratio_flags(file_priv, &crtc_resp->mode); drm_modeset_unlock(&crtc->mutex); return 0; @@ -628,6 +629,13 @@ int drm_mode_setcrtc(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, ret = -ENOMEM; goto out; } + if (!drm_mode_aspect_ratio_allowed(file_priv, + &crtc_req->mode)) { + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unexpected aspect-ratio flag bits\n"); + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + ret = drm_mode_convert_umode(dev, mode, &crtc_req->mode); if (ret) { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_internal.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_internal.h index 5d307b2..31d6c77 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_internal.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_internal.h @@ -222,3 +222,9 @@ int drm_mode_page_flip_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void drm_mode_fixup_1366x768(struct drm_display_mode *mode); void drm_reset_display_info(struct drm_connector *connector); u32 drm_add_display_info(struct drm_connector *connector, const struct edid *edid); + +/* drm_modes.c */ +bool drm_mode_aspect_ratio_allowed(const struct drm_file *file_priv, + struct drm_mode_modeinfo *umode); +void drm_mode_filter_aspect_ratio_flags(const struct drm_file *file_priv, + struct drm_mode_modeinfo *umode); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c index c395a24..2bf2f0b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c @@ -1759,3 +1759,50 @@ bool drm_mode_is_420(const struct drm_display_info *display, drm_mode_is_420_also(display, mode); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_is_420); + +/** + * drm_mode_aspect_ratio_allowed - checks if the aspect-ratio information + * is expected from the user-mode. + * + * If the user has set aspect-ratio cap, then the flag of the user-mode is + * allowed to contain aspect-ratio value. + * If the user does not set aspect-ratio cap, then the only value allowed in the + * flags bits is aspect-ratio NONE. + * + * @file_priv: file private structure to get the user capabilities + * @umode: drm_mode_modeinfo struct, whose flag carry the aspect ratio + * information. + * + * Returns: + * true if the aspect-ratio info is allowed in the user-mode flags. + * false, otherwise. + */ +bool +drm_mode_aspect_ratio_allowed(const struct drm_file *file_priv, + struct drm_mode_modeinfo *umode) +{ + if (file_priv->aspect_ratio_allowed || + (umode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIC_AR_MASK) == DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIC_AR_NONE) + return true; + return false; +} + +/** + * drm_mode_filter_aspect_ratio_flags - filters the aspect-ratio bits in the + * user-mode flags. + * + * Checks if the aspect-ratio information is allowed. Resets the aspect-ratio + * bits in the user-mode flags, if aspect-ratio info is not allowed. + * + * @file_priv: file private structure to get the user capabilities. + * @umode: drm_mode_modeinfo struct, whose flags' aspect-ratio bits needs to + * be filtered. + * + */ +void +drm_mode_filter_aspect_ratio_flags(const struct drm_file *file_priv, + struct drm_mode_modeinfo *umode) +{ + if (!drm_mode_aspect_ratio_allowed(file_priv, umode)) + umode->flags &= ~DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIC_AR_MASK; +}