@@ -129,7 +129,8 @@ static bool intel_dp_link_max_vswing_reached(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
intel_dp_link_training_clock_recovery(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
uint8_t voltage;
- int voltage_tries, max_vswing_tries, cr_tries, max_cr_tries;
+ int voltage_tries, cr_tries, max_cr_tries;
+ bool max_vswing = false;
uint8_t link_config[2];
uint8_t link_bw, rate_select;
@@ -181,7 +182,6 @@ static bool intel_dp_link_max_vswing_reached(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
max_cr_tries = 80;
voltage_tries = 1;
- max_vswing_tries = 0;
for (cr_tries = 0; cr_tries < max_cr_tries; ++cr_tries) {
uint8_t link_status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE];
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static bool intel_dp_link_max_vswing_reached(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
return false;
}
- if (max_vswing_tries == 1) {
+ if (max_vswing) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Max Voltage Swing reached\n");
return false;
}
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static bool intel_dp_link_max_vswing_reached(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
voltage_tries = 1;
if (intel_dp_link_max_vswing_reached(intel_dp))
- ++max_vswing_tries;
+ max_vswing = true;
}
DRM_ERROR("Failed clock recovery %d times, giving up!\n", max_cr_tries);
Changes the type and renames the max_vswing_tries variable which was declared as an integer but used as a boolean making it easy to be confused with a counter. Changes in v2: - updated the title and commit message - left the loop exit point in place v3: fix typo in title Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Marc Herbert <marc.herbert@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Nathan Ciobanu <nathan.d.ciobanu@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)