diff mbox

[08/17] drm/i915: Drop local struct_mutex around intel_init_emon[ilk]

Message ID 20160828204624.21193-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Chris Wilson Aug. 28, 2016, 8:46 p.m. UTC
Access to intel_init_emon() is strictly ordered by gt_powersave, using
struct_mutex around it is overkill (and will conflict with the caller
holding struct_mutex themselves).

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Mika Kuoppala Aug. 29, 2016, 1:53 p.m. UTC | #1
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> Access to intel_init_emon() is strictly ordered by gt_powersave, using
> struct_mutex around it is overkill (and will conflict with the caller
> holding struct_mutex themselves).
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index aba6fd036c4e..5e2a33d066c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -6773,9 +6773,7 @@ void intel_autoenable_gt_powersave(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  
>  	if (IS_IRONLAKE_M(dev_priv)) {
>  		ironlake_enable_drps(dev_priv);
> -		mutex_lock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
>  		intel_init_emon(dev_priv);
> -		mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
>  	} else if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen >= 6) {
>  		/*
>  		 * PCU communication is slow and this doesn't need to be
> -- 
> 2.9.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Joonas Lahtinen Aug. 29, 2016, 1:57 p.m. UTC | #2
On su, 2016-08-28 at 21:46 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Access to intel_init_emon() is strictly ordered by gt_powersave, using

How exactly?

> struct_mutex around it is overkill (and will conflict with the caller
> holding struct_mutex themselves).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Was this intentionally added to the series? Maybe a splat could be
included.

Regards, Joonas
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index aba6fd036c4e..5e2a33d066c4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -6773,9 +6773,7 @@  void intel_autoenable_gt_powersave(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 
 	if (IS_IRONLAKE_M(dev_priv)) {
 		ironlake_enable_drps(dev_priv);
-		mutex_lock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
 		intel_init_emon(dev_priv);
-		mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
 	} else if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen >= 6) {
 		/*
 		 * PCU communication is slow and this doesn't need to be