| Message ID | 20170714163555.9748-2-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c index 3caf330017da..c2c7afe6a902 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c @@ -550,11 +550,11 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) hsw_psr_setup_vsc(intel_dp); - hsw_psr_enable_source(intel_dp); - /* Enable PSR on the panel */ hsw_psr_enable_sink(intel_dp); + hsw_psr_enable_source(intel_dp); + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9) intel_psr_activate(intel_dp); } else {
No functional change is expected here since at this point PSR is not allowed to go to any active state. In other words, not really enabled. However let's do in a separated patch so it gets clear on what is change and specially it can helps on bisect case if we figure something has caused changes in behaviour. But this needs to be done before we make the vfunc to enable source to be in parity with VLV implementation. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com> Cc: Vathsala NAgaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)