diff mbox

[2/6] drm/i915/psr: Tie PSR2 support to Y coordinate requirement in intel_psr_init_dpcd()

Message ID 20180314223617.20122-2-jose.souza@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Souza, Jose March 14, 2018, 10:36 p.m. UTC
Move to only one place the sink requirements that the actual driver
needs to enable PSR2.

Also intel_psr2_config_valid() is called every time the crtc config
is computed, wasting some time every time it was checking for
Y coordinate requirement.

This allow us to nuke y_cord_support and some of VSC setup code that
was handling a scenario that would never happen(PSR2 without Y
coordinate).

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h  |  1 -
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

Comments

Rodrigo Vivi March 16, 2018, 12:35 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 03:36:13PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> Move to only one place the sink requirements that the actual driver
> needs to enable PSR2.
> 
> Also intel_psr2_config_valid() is called every time the crtc config
> is computed, wasting some time every time it was checking for
> Y coordinate requirement.
> 
> This allow us to nuke y_cord_support and some of VSC setup code that
> was handling a scenario that would never happen(PSR2 without Y
> coordinate).
> 
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h  |  1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 8a584273f897..d4bc8d18f56c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -603,7 +603,6 @@ struct i915_psr {
>  	unsigned busy_frontbuffer_bits;
>  	bool psr2_support;
>  	bool link_standby;
> -	bool y_cord_support;
>  	bool colorimetry_support;
>  	bool alpm;
>  	bool has_hw_tracking;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index 9811f5f0bc75..62d97d5576d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static void psr_aux_io_power_put(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, psr_aux_domain(intel_dp));
>  }
>  
> -static bool intel_dp_get_y_cord_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +static bool intel_dp_get_y_coord_required(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
>  	uint8_t psr_caps = 0;
>  
> @@ -137,22 +137,38 @@ void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  
>  	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9 &&
>  	    (intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0] & DP_PSR2_IS_SUPPORTED)) {
> -		uint8_t frame_sync_cap;
> +		uint8_t frame_sync_cap, y_coord_req;
>  
>  		dev_priv->psr.sink_support = true;
> +
> +		/* PSR2 needs frame sync to do selective updates */
>  		if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux,
>  				      DP_SINK_DEVICE_AUX_FRAME_SYNC_CAP,
>  				      &frame_sync_cap) != 1)
>  			frame_sync_cap = 0;
>  		frame_sync_cap = (frame_sync_cap & DP_AUX_FRAME_SYNC_CAP);
> -		/* PSR2 needs frame sync as well */
> -		dev_priv->psr.psr2_support = frame_sync_cap;
> -		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 %s on sink",
> -			      dev_priv->psr.psr2_support ? "supported" : "not supported");
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * FIXME: Enable PSR2 only for y-coordinate PSR2 panels
> +		 * After GTC implementation, remove this restriction.

I believe we should remove the FIXME and just comment out that non y-coordinate
would need GTC that we currently don't implement.

later if we change our minds and decided to add that support we revisit here
but without a FIXME poluting code for something we don't plan to support for now.

> +		 *
> +		 * All panels that supports PSR version 3 that is

PSRv3? is there really something formal about that?

> +		 * PSR2 + Y-coordinate support can handle Y coordinates in VSC
> +		 * but we are only sure that it is going to be used when
> +		 * required by the panel. This way panel is capable to do
> +		 * selective update even without a valid aux frame sync.
> +		 */
> +		y_coord_req = intel_dp_get_y_coord_required(intel_dp);
> +
> +		dev_priv->psr.psr2_support = frame_sync_cap && y_coord_req;
> +		if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support)
> +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 supported on sink\n");
> +		else
> +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not supported on sink"
> +				      "(frame sync: %d Y-coord required: %d)\n",
> +				      frame_sync_cap, y_coord_req);
>  
>  		if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
> -			dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support =
> -				intel_dp_get_y_cord_status(intel_dp);
>  			dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support =
>  				intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status(intel_dp);
>  			dev_priv->psr.alpm =
> @@ -198,16 +214,12 @@ static void hsw_psr_setup_vsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  		memset(&psr_vsc, 0, sizeof(psr_vsc));
>  		psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB0 = 0;
>  		psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB1 = 0x7;
> -		if (dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support &&
> -		    dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support) {
> +		if (dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support) {
>  			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB2 = 0x5;
>  			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB3 = 0x13;
> -		} else if (dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support) {
> +		} else {
>  			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB2 = 0x4;
>  			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB3 = 0xe;
> -		} else {
> -			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB2 = 0x3;
> -			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB3 = 0xc;
>  		}
>  	} else {
>  		/* Prepare VSC packet as per EDP 1.3 spec, Table 3.10 */
> @@ -478,15 +490,6 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  		return false;
>  	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * FIXME:enable psr2 only for y-cordinate psr2 panels
> -	 * After gtc implementation , remove this restriction.
> -	 */
> -	if (!dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support) {
> -		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not enabled, panel does not support Y coordinate\n");
> -		return false;
> -	}
> -
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> @@ -586,14 +589,12 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
>  	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
> -	u32 chicken;
>  
>  	psr_aux_io_power_get(intel_dp);
>  
>  	if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
> -		chicken = PSR2_VSC_ENABLE_PROG_HEADER;
> -		if (dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support)
> -			chicken |= PSR2_ADD_VERTICAL_LINE_COUNT;
> +		u32 chicken = PSR2_VSC_ENABLE_PROG_HEADER
> +			      | PSR2_ADD_VERTICAL_LINE_COUNT;
>  		I915_WRITE(CHICKEN_TRANS(cpu_transcoder), chicken);
>  
>  		I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG,
> -- 
> 2.16.2
>
Souza, Jose March 16, 2018, 1:04 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 17:35 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 03:36:13PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza

> wrote:

> > Move to only one place the sink requirements that the actual driver

> > needs to enable PSR2.

> > 

> > Also intel_psr2_config_valid() is called every time the crtc config

> > is computed, wasting some time every time it was checking for

> > Y coordinate requirement.

> > 

> > This allow us to nuke y_cord_support and some of VSC setup code

> > that

> > was handling a scenario that would never happen(PSR2 without Y

> > coordinate).

> > 

> > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>

> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

> > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>

> > ---

> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h  |  1 -

> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++------

> > --------------

> >  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

> > 

> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h

> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h

> > index 8a584273f897..d4bc8d18f56c 100644

> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h

> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h

> > @@ -603,7 +603,6 @@ struct i915_psr {

> >  	unsigned busy_frontbuffer_bits;

> >  	bool psr2_support;

> >  	bool link_standby;

> > -	bool y_cord_support;

> >  	bool colorimetry_support;

> >  	bool alpm;

> >  	bool has_hw_tracking;

> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c

> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c

> > index 9811f5f0bc75..62d97d5576d1 100644

> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c

> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c

> > @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static void psr_aux_io_power_put(struct intel_dp

> > *intel_dp)

> >  	intel_display_power_put(dev_priv,

> > psr_aux_domain(intel_dp));

> >  }

> >  

> > -static bool intel_dp_get_y_cord_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)

> > +static bool intel_dp_get_y_coord_required(struct intel_dp

> > *intel_dp)

> >  {

> >  	uint8_t psr_caps = 0;

> >  

> > @@ -137,22 +137,38 @@ void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp

> > *intel_dp)

> >  

> >  	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9 &&

> >  	    (intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0] & DP_PSR2_IS_SUPPORTED)) {

> > -		uint8_t frame_sync_cap;

> > +		uint8_t frame_sync_cap, y_coord_req;

> >  

> >  		dev_priv->psr.sink_support = true;

> > +

> > +		/* PSR2 needs frame sync to do selective updates

> > */

> >  		if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux,

> >  				      DP_SINK_DEVICE_AUX_FRAME_SYN

> > C_CAP,

> >  				      &frame_sync_cap) != 1)

> >  			frame_sync_cap = 0;

> >  		frame_sync_cap = (frame_sync_cap &

> > DP_AUX_FRAME_SYNC_CAP);

> > -		/* PSR2 needs frame sync as well */

> > -		dev_priv->psr.psr2_support = frame_sync_cap;

> > -		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 %s on sink",

> > -			      dev_priv->psr.psr2_support ?

> > "supported" : "not supported");

> > +

> > +		/*

> > +		 * FIXME: Enable PSR2 only for y-coordinate PSR2

> > panels

> > +		 * After GTC implementation, remove this

> > restriction.

> 

> I believe we should remove the FIXME and just comment out that non y-

> coordinate

> would need GTC that we currently don't implement.

> 

> later if we change our minds and decided to add that support we

> revisit here

> but without a FIXME poluting code for something we don't plan to

> support for now.

> 

> > +		 *

> > +		 * All panels that supports PSR version 3 that is

> 

> PSRv3? is there really something formal about that?


Yes, from eDP spec:

PSR Support and Version

00h = Panel Self Refresh Capability is not supported (default).
If PSR/PSR2 is supported, the SET_POWER_CAPABLE bit in the
EDP_GENERAL_CAPABILITY_1 register (DPCD Address 00701h, bit 7) must
be set to 1.
01h = Panel Self Refresh capability is supported, PSR version is 01h
(PSR).
02h = Panel Self Refresh with Selective Update (SU) capability is
supported,
PSR version is 02h (PSR2). Y-coordinates for SU are not supported.
Supported
by eDP v1.4 (and higher).
03h = Panel Self Refresh with SU capability and Y-coordinate supported,
PSR
version is 03h (PSR2 + Y-coordinate). Supported by eDP v1.4a (and
higher).

> 

> > +		 * PSR2 + Y-coordinate support can handle Y

> > coordinates in VSC

> > +		 * but we are only sure that it is going to be

> > used when

> > +		 * required by the panel. This way panel is

> > capable to do

> > +		 * selective update even without a valid aux frame

> > sync.

> > +		 */

> > +		y_coord_req =

> > intel_dp_get_y_coord_required(intel_dp);

> > +

> > +		dev_priv->psr.psr2_support = frame_sync_cap &&

> > y_coord_req;

> > +		if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support)

> > +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 supported on sink\n");

> > +		else

> > +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not supported on sink"

> > +				      "(frame sync: %d Y-coord

> > required: %d)\n",

> > +				      frame_sync_cap,

> > y_coord_req);

> >  

> >  		if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {

> > -			dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support =

> > -				intel_dp_get_y_cord_status(intel_d

> > p);

> >  			dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support =

> >  				intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status(in

> > tel_dp);

> >  			dev_priv->psr.alpm =

> > @@ -198,16 +214,12 @@ static void hsw_psr_setup_vsc(struct intel_dp

> > *intel_dp,

> >  		memset(&psr_vsc, 0, sizeof(psr_vsc));

> >  		psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB0 = 0;

> >  		psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB1 = 0x7;

> > -		if (dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support &&

> > -		    dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support) {

> > +		if (dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support) {

> >  			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB2 = 0x5;

> >  			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB3 = 0x13;

> > -		} else if (dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support) {

> > +		} else {

> >  			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB2 = 0x4;

> >  			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB3 = 0xe;

> > -		} else {

> > -			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB2 = 0x3;

> > -			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB3 = 0xc;

> >  		}

> >  	} else {

> >  		/* Prepare VSC packet as per EDP 1.3 spec, Table

> > 3.10 */

> > @@ -478,15 +490,6 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct

> > intel_dp *intel_dp,

> >  		return false;

> >  	}

> >  

> > -	/*

> > -	 * FIXME:enable psr2 only for y-cordinate psr2 panels

> > -	 * After gtc implementation , remove this restriction.

> > -	 */

> > -	if (!dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support) {

> > -		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not enabled, panel does not

> > support Y coordinate\n");

> > -		return false;

> > -	}

> > -

> >  	return true;

> >  }

> >  

> > @@ -586,14 +589,12 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct

> > intel_dp *intel_dp,

> >  	struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;

> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);

> >  	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state-

> > >cpu_transcoder;

> > -	u32 chicken;

> >  

> >  	psr_aux_io_power_get(intel_dp);

> >  

> >  	if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {

> > -		chicken = PSR2_VSC_ENABLE_PROG_HEADER;

> > -		if (dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support)

> > -			chicken |= PSR2_ADD_VERTICAL_LINE_COUNT;

> > +		u32 chicken = PSR2_VSC_ENABLE_PROG_HEADER

> > +			      | PSR2_ADD_VERTICAL_LINE_COUNT;

> >  		I915_WRITE(CHICKEN_TRANS(cpu_transcoder),

> > chicken);

> >  

> >  		I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG,

> > -- 

> > 2.16.2

> >
Rodrigo Vivi March 16, 2018, 1:16 a.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 06:04:27PM -0700, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 17:35 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 03:36:13PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza
> > wrote:
> > > Move to only one place the sink requirements that the actual driver
> > > needs to enable PSR2.
> > > 
> > > Also intel_psr2_config_valid() is called every time the crtc config
> > > is computed, wasting some time every time it was checking for
> > > Y coordinate requirement.
> > > 
> > > This allow us to nuke y_cord_support and some of VSC setup code
> > > that
> > > was handling a scenario that would never happen(PSR2 without Y
> > > coordinate).
> > > 
> > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h  |  1 -
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++------
> > > --------------
> > >  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > index 8a584273f897..d4bc8d18f56c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > @@ -603,7 +603,6 @@ struct i915_psr {
> > >  	unsigned busy_frontbuffer_bits;
> > >  	bool psr2_support;
> > >  	bool link_standby;
> > > -	bool y_cord_support;
> > >  	bool colorimetry_support;
> > >  	bool alpm;
> > >  	bool has_hw_tracking;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > > index 9811f5f0bc75..62d97d5576d1 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > > @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static void psr_aux_io_power_put(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > >  	intel_display_power_put(dev_priv,
> > > psr_aux_domain(intel_dp));
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -static bool intel_dp_get_y_cord_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > +static bool intel_dp_get_y_coord_required(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > >  {
> > >  	uint8_t psr_caps = 0;
> > >  
> > > @@ -137,22 +137,38 @@ void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > >  
> > >  	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9 &&
> > >  	    (intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0] & DP_PSR2_IS_SUPPORTED)) {
> > > -		uint8_t frame_sync_cap;
> > > +		uint8_t frame_sync_cap, y_coord_req;
> > >  
> > >  		dev_priv->psr.sink_support = true;
> > > +
> > > +		/* PSR2 needs frame sync to do selective updates
> > > */
> > >  		if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux,
> > >  				      DP_SINK_DEVICE_AUX_FRAME_SYN
> > > C_CAP,
> > >  				      &frame_sync_cap) != 1)
> > >  			frame_sync_cap = 0;
> > >  		frame_sync_cap = (frame_sync_cap &
> > > DP_AUX_FRAME_SYNC_CAP);
> > > -		/* PSR2 needs frame sync as well */
> > > -		dev_priv->psr.psr2_support = frame_sync_cap;
> > > -		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 %s on sink",
> > > -			      dev_priv->psr.psr2_support ?
> > > "supported" : "not supported");
> > > +
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * FIXME: Enable PSR2 only for y-coordinate PSR2
> > > panels
> > > +		 * After GTC implementation, remove this
> > > restriction.
> > 
> > I believe we should remove the FIXME and just comment out that non y-
> > coordinate
> > would need GTC that we currently don't implement.
> > 
> > later if we change our minds and decided to add that support we
> > revisit here
> > but without a FIXME poluting code for something we don't plan to
> > support for now.
> > 
> > > +		 *
> > > +		 * All panels that supports PSR version 3 that is
> > 
> > PSRv3? is there really something formal about that?
> 
> Yes, from eDP spec:
> 
> PSR Support and Version
> 
> 00h = Panel Self Refresh Capability is not supported (default).
> If PSR/PSR2 is supported, the SET_POWER_CAPABLE bit in the
> EDP_GENERAL_CAPABILITY_1 register (DPCD Address 00701h, bit 7) must
> be set to 1.
> 01h = Panel Self Refresh capability is supported, PSR version is 01h
> (PSR).
> 02h = Panel Self Refresh with Selective Update (SU) capability is
> supported,
> PSR version is 02h (PSR2). Y-coordinates for SU are not supported.
> Supported
> by eDP v1.4 (and higher).
> 03h = Panel Self Refresh with SU capability and Y-coordinate supported,
> PSR
> version is 03h (PSR2 + Y-coordinate). Supported by eDP v1.4a (and
> higher).

Oh cool! now I understand the comment.
Could we add the comment like in spec ie
s/PSR version 3 that is PSR2 + Y-coordinate/PSR version 03h (PSR2 + Y-coordinate)/
?
just to avoid giving impression of a PSR3 support and someone
freaking out thinking that we would need much more changes ;)

> 
> > 
> > > +		 * PSR2 + Y-coordinate support can handle Y
> > > coordinates in VSC
> > > +		 * but we are only sure that it is going to be
> > > used when
> > > +		 * required by the panel. This way panel is
> > > capable to do
> > > +		 * selective update even without a valid aux frame
> > > sync.
> > > +		 */
> > > +		y_coord_req =
> > > intel_dp_get_y_coord_required(intel_dp);
> > > +
> > > +		dev_priv->psr.psr2_support = frame_sync_cap &&
> > > y_coord_req;
> > > +		if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support)
> > > +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 supported on sink\n");
> > > +		else
> > > +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not supported on sink"
> > > +				      "(frame sync: %d Y-coord
> > > required: %d)\n",
> > > +				      frame_sync_cap,
> > > y_coord_req);
> > >  
> > >  		if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
> > > -			dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support =
> > > -				intel_dp_get_y_cord_status(intel_d
> > > p);
> > >  			dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support =
> > >  				intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status(in
> > > tel_dp);
> > >  			dev_priv->psr.alpm =
> > > @@ -198,16 +214,12 @@ static void hsw_psr_setup_vsc(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp,
> > >  		memset(&psr_vsc, 0, sizeof(psr_vsc));
> > >  		psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB0 = 0;
> > >  		psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB1 = 0x7;
> > > -		if (dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support &&
> > > -		    dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support) {
> > > +		if (dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support) {
> > >  			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB2 = 0x5;
> > >  			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB3 = 0x13;
> > > -		} else if (dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support) {
> > > +		} else {
> > >  			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB2 = 0x4;
> > >  			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB3 = 0xe;
> > > -		} else {
> > > -			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB2 = 0x3;
> > > -			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB3 = 0xc;
> > >  		}
> > >  	} else {
> > >  		/* Prepare VSC packet as per EDP 1.3 spec, Table
> > > 3.10 */
> > > @@ -478,15 +490,6 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct
> > > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > >  		return false;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -	/*
> > > -	 * FIXME:enable psr2 only for y-cordinate psr2 panels
> > > -	 * After gtc implementation , remove this restriction.
> > > -	 */
> > > -	if (!dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support) {
> > > -		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not enabled, panel does not
> > > support Y coordinate\n");
> > > -		return false;
> > > -	}
> > > -
> > >  	return true;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > @@ -586,14 +589,12 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct
> > > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > >  	struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
> > >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > >  	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state-
> > > >cpu_transcoder;
> > > -	u32 chicken;
> > >  
> > >  	psr_aux_io_power_get(intel_dp);
> > >  
> > >  	if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
> > > -		chicken = PSR2_VSC_ENABLE_PROG_HEADER;
> > > -		if (dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support)
> > > -			chicken |= PSR2_ADD_VERTICAL_LINE_COUNT;
> > > +		u32 chicken = PSR2_VSC_ENABLE_PROG_HEADER
> > > +			      | PSR2_ADD_VERTICAL_LINE_COUNT;
> > >  		I915_WRITE(CHICKEN_TRANS(cpu_transcoder),
> > > chicken);
> > >  
> > >  		I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG,
> > > -- 
> > > 2.16.2
> > >
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 8a584273f897..d4bc8d18f56c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -603,7 +603,6 @@  struct i915_psr {
 	unsigned busy_frontbuffer_bits;
 	bool psr2_support;
 	bool link_standby;
-	bool y_cord_support;
 	bool colorimetry_support;
 	bool alpm;
 	bool has_hw_tracking;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index 9811f5f0bc75..62d97d5576d1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@  static void psr_aux_io_power_put(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, psr_aux_domain(intel_dp));
 }
 
-static bool intel_dp_get_y_cord_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
+static bool intel_dp_get_y_coord_required(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 {
 	uint8_t psr_caps = 0;
 
@@ -137,22 +137,38 @@  void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 
 	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9 &&
 	    (intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0] & DP_PSR2_IS_SUPPORTED)) {
-		uint8_t frame_sync_cap;
+		uint8_t frame_sync_cap, y_coord_req;
 
 		dev_priv->psr.sink_support = true;
+
+		/* PSR2 needs frame sync to do selective updates */
 		if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux,
 				      DP_SINK_DEVICE_AUX_FRAME_SYNC_CAP,
 				      &frame_sync_cap) != 1)
 			frame_sync_cap = 0;
 		frame_sync_cap = (frame_sync_cap & DP_AUX_FRAME_SYNC_CAP);
-		/* PSR2 needs frame sync as well */
-		dev_priv->psr.psr2_support = frame_sync_cap;
-		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 %s on sink",
-			      dev_priv->psr.psr2_support ? "supported" : "not supported");
+
+		/*
+		 * FIXME: Enable PSR2 only for y-coordinate PSR2 panels
+		 * After GTC implementation, remove this restriction.
+		 *
+		 * All panels that supports PSR version 3 that is
+		 * PSR2 + Y-coordinate support can handle Y coordinates in VSC
+		 * but we are only sure that it is going to be used when
+		 * required by the panel. This way panel is capable to do
+		 * selective update even without a valid aux frame sync.
+		 */
+		y_coord_req = intel_dp_get_y_coord_required(intel_dp);
+
+		dev_priv->psr.psr2_support = frame_sync_cap && y_coord_req;
+		if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support)
+			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 supported on sink\n");
+		else
+			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not supported on sink"
+				      "(frame sync: %d Y-coord required: %d)\n",
+				      frame_sync_cap, y_coord_req);
 
 		if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
-			dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support =
-				intel_dp_get_y_cord_status(intel_dp);
 			dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support =
 				intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status(intel_dp);
 			dev_priv->psr.alpm =
@@ -198,16 +214,12 @@  static void hsw_psr_setup_vsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 		memset(&psr_vsc, 0, sizeof(psr_vsc));
 		psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB0 = 0;
 		psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB1 = 0x7;
-		if (dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support &&
-		    dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support) {
+		if (dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support) {
 			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB2 = 0x5;
 			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB3 = 0x13;
-		} else if (dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support) {
+		} else {
 			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB2 = 0x4;
 			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB3 = 0xe;
-		} else {
-			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB2 = 0x3;
-			psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB3 = 0xc;
 		}
 	} else {
 		/* Prepare VSC packet as per EDP 1.3 spec, Table 3.10 */
@@ -478,15 +490,6 @@  static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 		return false;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * FIXME:enable psr2 only for y-cordinate psr2 panels
-	 * After gtc implementation , remove this restriction.
-	 */
-	if (!dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support) {
-		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not enabled, panel does not support Y coordinate\n");
-		return false;
-	}
-
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -586,14 +589,12 @@  static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 	struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
 	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
-	u32 chicken;
 
 	psr_aux_io_power_get(intel_dp);
 
 	if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
-		chicken = PSR2_VSC_ENABLE_PROG_HEADER;
-		if (dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support)
-			chicken |= PSR2_ADD_VERTICAL_LINE_COUNT;
+		u32 chicken = PSR2_VSC_ENABLE_PROG_HEADER
+			      | PSR2_ADD_VERTICAL_LINE_COUNT;
 		I915_WRITE(CHICKEN_TRANS(cpu_transcoder), chicken);
 
 		I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG,