From patchwork Fri Mar 23 14:47:16 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Michal Wajdeczko X-Patchwork-Id: 10304915 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11EAC60386 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:47:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030A528210 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:47:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id EC148283F9; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:47:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5232428210 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369336E68D; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:47:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8A736E5B2 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:47:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Mar 2018 07:47:37 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,350,1517904000"; d="scan'208";a="36237119" Received: from irvmail001.ir.intel.com ([163.33.26.43]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Mar 2018 07:47:36 -0700 Received: from mwajdecz-MOBL1.ger.corp.intel.com (mwajdecz-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com [172.28.174.31]) by irvmail001.ir.intel.com (8.14.3/8.13.6/MailSET/Hub) with ESMTP id w2NElYMI014077; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:47:35 GMT From: Michal Wajdeczko To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:47:16 +0000 Message-Id: <20180323144728.61548-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.10.1.windows.1 In-Reply-To: <20180323144728.61548-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> References: <20180323144728.61548-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 01/13] drm/i915/guc: Add documentation for MMIO based communication X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP As we are going to extend our use of MMIO based communication, try to explain its mechanics and update corresponding definitions. Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble Cc: Kelvin Gardiner Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c | 20 ++++---- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_ct.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c index 8f93f5b..28075e6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c @@ -329,6 +329,9 @@ int intel_guc_send_mmio(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len) GEM_BUG_ON(!len); GEM_BUG_ON(len > guc->send_regs.count); + /* We expect only action code */ + GEM_BUG_ON(*action & ~INTEL_GUC_MSG_CODE_MASK); + /* If CT is available, we expect to use MMIO only during init/fini */ GEM_BUG_ON(HAS_GUC_CT(dev_priv) && *action != INTEL_GUC_ACTION_REGISTER_COMMAND_TRANSPORT_BUFFER && @@ -350,18 +353,15 @@ int intel_guc_send_mmio(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len) */ ret = __intel_wait_for_register_fw(dev_priv, guc_send_reg(guc, 0), - INTEL_GUC_RECV_MASK, - INTEL_GUC_RECV_MASK, + INTEL_GUC_MSG_TYPE_MASK, + INTEL_GUC_MSG_TYPE_RESPONSE << + INTEL_GUC_MSG_TYPE_SHIFT, 10, 10, &status); - if (status != INTEL_GUC_STATUS_SUCCESS) { - /* - * Either the GuC explicitly returned an error (which - * we convert to -EIO here) or no response at all was - * received within the timeout limit (-ETIMEDOUT) - */ - if (ret != -ETIMEDOUT) - ret = -EIO; + /* If GuC explicitly returned an error, convert it to -EIO */ + if (!ret && !INTEL_GUC_MSG_IS_RESPONSE_SUCCESS(status)) + ret = -EIO; + if (ret) { DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("INTEL_GUC_SEND: Action 0x%X failed;" " ret=%d status=0x%08X response=0x%08X\n", action[0], ret, status, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_ct.c index a726283..1dafa7a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_ct.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_ct.c @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static int ctch_send(struct intel_guc *guc, err = wait_for_response(desc, fence, status); if (unlikely(err)) return err; - if (*status != INTEL_GUC_STATUS_SUCCESS) + if (!INTEL_GUC_MSG_IS_RESPONSE_SUCCESS(*status)) return -EIO; return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h index 72941bd..1701879 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h @@ -560,7 +560,68 @@ struct guc_shared_ctx_data { struct guc_ctx_report preempt_ctx_report[GUC_MAX_ENGINES_NUM]; } __packed; -/* This Action will be programmed in C180 - SOFT_SCRATCH_O_REG */ +/** + * DOC: MMIO based communication + * + * The MMIO based communication between Host and GuC uses software scratch + * registers, where first register holds data treated as message header, + * and other registers are used to hold message payload. + * + * For Gen9+, GuC uses software scratch registers 0xC180-0xC1B8 + * + * +-----------+---------+---------+---------+ + * | MMIO[0] | MMIO[1] | ... | MMIO[n] | + * +-----------+---------+---------+---------+ + * | header | optional payload | + * +======+====+=========+=========+=========+ + * | 31:28|type| | | | + * +------+----+ | | | + * | 27:16|data| | | | + * +------+----+ | | | + * | 15:0|code| | | | + * +------+----+---------+---------+---------+ + * + * The message header consists of: + * + * - **type**, indicates message type + * - **code**, indicates message code, is specific for **type** + * - **data**, indicates message data, optional, depends on **code** + * + * The following message **types** are supported: + * + * - **REQUEST**, indicates Host-to-GuC request, requested GuC action code + * must be priovided in **code** field. Optional action specific parameters + * can be provided in remaining payload registers or **data** field. + * + * - **RESPONSE**, indicates GuC-to-Host response from earlier GuC request, + * action response status will be provided in **code** field. Optional + * response data can be returned in remaining payload registers or **data** + * field. + */ + +#define INTEL_GUC_MSG_TYPE_SHIFT 28 +#define INTEL_GUC_MSG_TYPE_MASK (0xF << INTEL_GUC_MSG_TYPE_SHIFT) +#define INTEL_GUC_MSG_DATA_SHIFT 16 +#define INTEL_GUC_MSG_DATA_MASK (0xFFF << INTEL_GUC_MSG_DATA_SHIFT) +#define INTEL_GUC_MSG_CODE_SHIFT 0 +#define INTEL_GUC_MSG_CODE_MASK (0xFFFF << INTEL_GUC_MSG_CODE_SHIFT) + +#define __INTEL_GUC_MSG_GET(T, m) \ + (((m) & INTEL_GUC_MSG_ ## T ## _MASK) >> INTEL_GUC_MSG_ ## T ## _SHIFT) +#define INTEL_GUC_MSG_TO_TYPE(m) __INTEL_GUC_MSG_GET(TYPE, m) +#define INTEL_GUC_MSG_TO_DATA(m) __INTEL_GUC_MSG_GET(DATA, m) +#define INTEL_GUC_MSG_TO_CODE(m) __INTEL_GUC_MSG_GET(CODE, m) + +enum intel_guc_msg_type { + INTEL_GUC_MSG_TYPE_REQUEST = 0x0, + INTEL_GUC_MSG_TYPE_RESPONSE = 0xF, +}; + +#define __INTEL_GUC_MSG_TYPE_IS(T, m) \ + (INTEL_GUC_MSG_TO_TYPE(m) == INTEL_GUC_MSG_TYPE_ ## T) +#define INTEL_GUC_MSG_IS_REQUEST(m) __INTEL_GUC_MSG_TYPE_IS(REQUEST, m) +#define INTEL_GUC_MSG_IS_RESPONSE(m) __INTEL_GUC_MSG_TYPE_IS(RESPONSE, m) + enum intel_guc_action { INTEL_GUC_ACTION_DEFAULT = 0x0, INTEL_GUC_ACTION_REQUEST_PREEMPTION = 0x2, @@ -597,24 +658,15 @@ enum intel_guc_report_status { #define GUC_LOG_CONTROL_VERBOSITY_MASK (0xF << GUC_LOG_CONTROL_VERBOSITY_SHIFT) #define GUC_LOG_CONTROL_DEFAULT_LOGGING (1 << 8) -/* - * The GuC sends its response to a command by overwriting the - * command in SS0. The response is distinguishable from a command - * by the fact that all the MASK bits are set. The remaining bits - * give more detail. - */ -#define INTEL_GUC_RECV_MASK ((u32)0xF0000000) -#define INTEL_GUC_RECV_IS_RESPONSE(x) ((u32)(x) >= INTEL_GUC_RECV_MASK) -#define INTEL_GUC_RECV_STATUS(x) (INTEL_GUC_RECV_MASK | (x)) - -/* GUC will return status back to SOFT_SCRATCH_O_REG */ -enum intel_guc_status { - INTEL_GUC_STATUS_SUCCESS = INTEL_GUC_RECV_STATUS(0x0), - INTEL_GUC_STATUS_ALLOCATE_DOORBELL_FAIL = INTEL_GUC_RECV_STATUS(0x10), - INTEL_GUC_STATUS_DEALLOCATE_DOORBELL_FAIL = INTEL_GUC_RECV_STATUS(0x20), - INTEL_GUC_STATUS_GENERIC_FAIL = INTEL_GUC_RECV_STATUS(0x0000F000) +enum intel_guc_response_status { + INTEL_GUC_RESPONSE_STATUS_SUCCESS = 0x0, + INTEL_GUC_RESPONSE_STATUS_GENERIC_FAIL = 0xF000, }; +#define INTEL_GUC_MSG_IS_RESPONSE_SUCCESS(m) \ + ((INTEL_GUC_MSG_TO_TYPE(m) == INTEL_GUC_MSG_TYPE_RESPONSE) && \ + (INTEL_GUC_MSG_TO_CODE(m) == INTEL_GUC_RESPONSE_STATUS_SUCCESS)) + /* This action will be programmed in C1BC - SOFT_SCRATCH_15_REG */ enum intel_guc_recv_message { INTEL_GUC_RECV_MSG_CRASH_DUMP_POSTED = BIT(1),