@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ static void __fence_set_priority(struct dma_fence *fence, int prio)
rcu_read_lock();
if (engine->schedule)
- engine->schedule(rq, prio);
+ engine->schedule(rq, prio, 0);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -1102,7 +1102,7 @@ void __i915_request_add(struct i915_request *request, bool flush_caches)
*/
rcu_read_lock();
if (engine->schedule)
- engine->schedule(request, request->ctx->priority);
+ engine->schedule(request, request->ctx->priority, 0);
rcu_read_unlock();
local_bh_disable();
@@ -1124,17 +1124,19 @@ static void queue_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
list_add_tail(&pt->link, &lookup_priolist(engine, pt, prio)->requests);
}
-static void __submit_queue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int prio)
+static void __submit_queue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+ int prio, unsigned int timeout)
{
engine->execlists.queue_priority = prio;
- engine->execlists.queue_preempt_timeout = 0;
+ engine->execlists.queue_preempt_timeout = timeout;
tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
}
-static void submit_queue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int prio)
+static void submit_queue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+ int prio, unsigned int timeout)
{
if (prio > engine->execlists.queue_priority)
- __submit_queue(engine, prio);
+ __submit_queue(engine, prio, timeout);
}
static void execlists_submit_request(struct i915_request *request)
@@ -1146,7 +1148,7 @@ static void execlists_submit_request(struct i915_request *request)
spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->timeline->lock, flags);
queue_request(engine, &request->priotree, rq_prio(request));
- submit_queue(engine, rq_prio(request));
+ submit_queue(engine, rq_prio(request), 0);
GEM_BUG_ON(!engine->execlists.first);
GEM_BUG_ON(list_empty(&request->priotree.link));
@@ -1174,7 +1176,8 @@ pt_lock_engine(struct i915_priotree *pt, struct intel_engine_cs *locked)
return engine;
}
-static void execlists_schedule(struct i915_request *request, int prio)
+static void execlists_schedule(struct i915_request *request,
+ int prio, unsigned int timeout)
{
struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
struct i915_dependency *dep, *p;
@@ -1270,7 +1273,7 @@ static void execlists_schedule(struct i915_request *request, int prio)
if (prio > engine->execlists.queue_priority &&
i915_sw_fence_done(&pt_to_request(pt)->submit))
- __submit_queue(engine, prio);
+ __submit_queue(engine, prio, timeout);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&engine->timeline->lock);
@@ -467,13 +467,15 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
*/
void (*submit_request)(struct i915_request *rq);
- /* Call when the priority on a request has changed and it and its
+ /*
+ * Call when the priority on a request has changed and it and its
* dependencies may need rescheduling. Note the request itself may
* not be ready to run!
*
* Called under the struct_mutex.
*/
- void (*schedule)(struct i915_request *request, int priority);
+ void (*schedule)(struct i915_request *request,
+ int priority, unsigned int timeout);
/*
* Cancel all requests on the hardware, or queued for execution.
The choice of preemption timeout is determined by the context from which we trigger the preemption, as such allow the caller to specify the desired timeout. Effectively the other choice would be to use the shortest timeout along the dependency chain. However, given that we would have already triggered preemption for the dependency chain, we can assume that no preemption along that chain is more important than the current request, ergo we need only consider the current timeout. Realising this, we can then pass control of the preemption timeout to the caller for greater flexibility. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 17 ++++++++++------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 6 ++++-- 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)