From patchwork Mon Mar 26 11:50:35 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Chris Wilson X-Patchwork-Id: 10307705 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCA960386 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:52:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79EA6280CF for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:52:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 6E74128607; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:52:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F3DD29653 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE82F6E37E; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:52:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from fireflyinternet.com (mail.fireflyinternet.com [109.228.58.192]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A35A86E37E for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:52:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=78.156.65.138; Received: from haswell.alporthouse.com (unverified [78.156.65.138]) by fireflyinternet.com (Firefly Internet (M1)) with ESMTP id 11158590-1500050 for multiple; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:50:50 +0100 Received: by haswell.alporthouse.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:50:49 +0100 From: Chris Wilson To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:50:35 +0100 Message-Id: <20180326115044.2505-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.3 In-Reply-To: <20180326115044.2505-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> References: <20180326115044.2505-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 78.156.65.138 X-Country: code=GB country="United Kingdom" ip=78.156.65.138 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915/execlists: Clear user-active flag on preemption completion X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP When cancelling the requests and clearing out the ports following a successful preemption completion, also clear the active flag. I had assumed that all preemptions would be followed by an immediate dequeue (preserving the active user flag), but under rare circumstances we may be triggering a preemption for the second port only for it to have completed before the preemotion kicks in; leaving execlists->active set even though the system is now idle. We can clear the flag inside the common execlists_cancel_port_requests() as the other users also expect the semantics of active being cleared. Fixes: f6322eddaff7 ("drm/i915/preemption: Allow preemption between submission ports") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Michał Winiarski Cc: Michel Thierry Cc: Mika Kuoppala Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c index 104b69e0494f..c302952ab476 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c @@ -577,6 +577,8 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) * know the next preemption status we see corresponds * to this ELSP update. */ + GEM_BUG_ON(!execlists_is_active(execlists, + EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER)); GEM_BUG_ON(!port_count(&port[0])); if (port_count(&port[0]) > 1) goto unlock; @@ -738,6 +740,8 @@ execlists_cancel_port_requests(struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists) memset(port, 0, sizeof(*port)); port++; } + + execlists_clear_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER); } static void clear_gtiir(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) @@ -1042,6 +1046,11 @@ static void execlists_submission_tasklet(unsigned long data) if (fw) intel_uncore_forcewake_put(dev_priv, execlists->fw_domains); + + /* If the engine is now idle, so should be the flag; and vice versa. */ + GEM_BUG_ON(execlists_is_active(&engine->execlists, + EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER) == + !port_isset(engine->execlists.port)); } static void queue_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,