Message ID | 20180327203557.64484-5-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 3/28/2018 2:05 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: > Since commit 6ca9a2beb54a ("drm/i915: Unwind i915_gem_init() failure") > we believed that we correctly handle all errors encountered during > GuC initialization, including special one that indicates request to > run driver with disabled GPU submission (-EIO). > > Unfortunately since commit 121981fafe69 ("drm/i915/guc: Combine > enable_guc_loading|submission modparams") we stopped using that > error code to avoid unwanted fallback to execlist submission mode. > > In result any GuC initialization failure was treated as non-recoverable > error leading to driver load abort, so we could not even read related > GuC error log to investigate cause of the problem. > > Fix that by always returning -EIO on uC hardware related failure. > > v2: don't allow -EIO from uc_init > don't call uc_fini[_misc] on -EIO > mark guc fw as failed on hw init failure > prepare uc_fini_hw to run after earlier -EIO > > v3: update comments (Sagar) > use sanitize functions on failure in init_hw (Michal) > and also sanitize guc/huc fw in fini_hw (Michal) > > v4: rebase > > Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> > Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> > Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> <snip> > void intel_uc_fini_hw(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > { > + struct intel_guc *guc = &i915->guc; > + > + if (!intel_guc_is_loaded(guc)) > + return; I feel above guc_is_loaded check is more applicable in uc_sanitize. So callers won't have to bother if GuC is loaded or not. w/ or w/o that change patch looks good though. Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> > + > intel_uc_sanitize(i915); > } > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc_fw.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc_fw.h > index dc33b12..77ad2aa 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc_fw.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc_fw.h > @@ -121,6 +121,11 @@ static inline void intel_uc_fw_sanitize(struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw) > uc_fw->load_status = INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_PENDING; > } > > +static inline bool intel_uc_fw_is_loaded(struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw) > +{ > + return uc_fw->load_status == INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SUCCESS; > +} > + > /** > * intel_uc_fw_get_upload_size() - Get size of firmware needed to be uploaded. > * @uc_fw: uC firmware.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index 65ba104..82000bd 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c @@ -5361,8 +5361,10 @@ int i915_gem_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) intel_init_gt_powersave(dev_priv); ret = intel_uc_init(dev_priv); - if (ret) + if (ret) { + GEM_BUG_ON(ret == -EIO); goto err_pm; + } ret = i915_gem_init_hw(dev_priv); if (ret) @@ -5409,7 +5411,8 @@ int i915_gem_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) i915_gem_contexts_lost(dev_priv); intel_uc_fini_hw(dev_priv); err_uc_init: - intel_uc_fini(dev_priv); + if (ret != -EIO) + intel_uc_fini(dev_priv); err_pm: if (ret != -EIO) { intel_cleanup_gt_powersave(dev_priv); @@ -5423,15 +5426,15 @@ int i915_gem_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) intel_uncore_forcewake_put(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL); mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex); - intel_uc_fini_misc(dev_priv); - - if (ret != -EIO) + if (ret != -EIO) { + intel_uc_fini_misc(dev_priv); i915_gem_cleanup_userptr(dev_priv); + } if (ret == -EIO) { /* - * Allow engine initialisation to fail by marking the GPU as - * wedged. But we only want to do this where the GPU is angry, + * Allow engines or uC initialization to fail by marking the GPU + * as wedged. But we only want to do this when the GPU is angry, * for all other failure, such as an allocation failure, bail. */ if (!i915_terminally_wedged(&dev_priv->gpu_error)) { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h index 13f3d1d..7325b0e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h @@ -155,6 +155,11 @@ static inline int intel_guc_sanitize(struct intel_guc *guc) return 0; } +static inline bool intel_guc_is_loaded(struct intel_guc *guc) +{ + return intel_uc_fw_is_loaded(&guc->fw); +} + static inline void intel_guc_enable_msg(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 mask) { spin_lock_irq(&guc->irq_lock); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c index 46c4dc4..2d8f5d9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c @@ -426,15 +426,24 @@ int intel_uc_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) * Note that there is no fallback as either user explicitly asked for * the GuC or driver default option was to run with the GuC enabled. */ - if (GEM_WARN_ON(ret == -EIO)) - ret = -EINVAL; - dev_err(dev_priv->drm.dev, "GuC initialization failed %d\n", ret); - return ret; + + /* Sanitize GuC/HuC to avoid clean-up on wedged */ + intel_huc_sanitize(huc); + intel_guc_sanitize(guc); + GEM_BUG_ON(intel_guc_is_loaded(guc)); + + /* We want to disable GPU submission but keep KMS alive */ + return -EIO; } void intel_uc_fini_hw(struct drm_i915_private *i915) { + struct intel_guc *guc = &i915->guc; + + if (!intel_guc_is_loaded(guc)) + return; + intel_uc_sanitize(i915); } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc_fw.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc_fw.h index dc33b12..77ad2aa 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc_fw.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc_fw.h @@ -121,6 +121,11 @@ static inline void intel_uc_fw_sanitize(struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw) uc_fw->load_status = INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_PENDING; } +static inline bool intel_uc_fw_is_loaded(struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw) +{ + return uc_fw->load_status == INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SUCCESS; +} + /** * intel_uc_fw_get_upload_size() - Get size of firmware needed to be uploaded. * @uc_fw: uC firmware.
Since commit 6ca9a2beb54a ("drm/i915: Unwind i915_gem_init() failure") we believed that we correctly handle all errors encountered during GuC initialization, including special one that indicates request to run driver with disabled GPU submission (-EIO). Unfortunately since commit 121981fafe69 ("drm/i915/guc: Combine enable_guc_loading|submission modparams") we stopped using that error code to avoid unwanted fallback to execlist submission mode. In result any GuC initialization failure was treated as non-recoverable error leading to driver load abort, so we could not even read related GuC error log to investigate cause of the problem. Fix that by always returning -EIO on uC hardware related failure. v2: don't allow -EIO from uc_init don't call uc_fini[_misc] on -EIO mark guc fw as failed on hw init failure prepare uc_fini_hw to run after earlier -EIO v3: update comments (Sagar) use sanitize functions on failure in init_hw (Michal) and also sanitize guc/huc fw in fini_hw (Michal) v4: rebase Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 17 ++++++++++------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h | 5 +++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c | 17 +++++++++++++---- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc_fw.h | 5 +++++ 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)