diff mbox

[v4,5/5] drm/i915/psr/bdw+: Enable CRC check in the static frame on the sink side

Message ID 20180614203433.5602-5-jose.souza@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Souza, Jose June 14, 2018, 8:34 p.m. UTC
Sink can be configured to calculate the CRC over the static frame and
compare with the CRC calculated and transmited in the VSC SDP by
source, if there is a mismatch sink will do a short pulse in HPD
and set DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR in DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS.

Spec: 7723

v4:
patch moved to after 'drm/i915/psr: Avoid PSR exit max time timeout'
to avoid touch in 2 patches EDP_PSR_DEBUG.

v3:
disabling PSR instead of exiting on error

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h  |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Rodrigo Vivi June 14, 2018, 9:19 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 01:34:33PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> Sink can be configured to calculate the CRC over the static frame and
> compare with the CRC calculated and transmited in the VSC SDP by
> source, if there is a mismatch sink will do a short pulse in HPD
> and set DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR in DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS.
> 
> Spec: 7723
> 
> v4:
> patch moved to after 'drm/i915/psr: Avoid PSR exit max time timeout'
> to avoid touch in 2 patches EDP_PSR_DEBUG.
> 
> v3:
> disabling PSR instead of exiting on error
> 
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h  |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 140f6a27d696..ed34ccd81c7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -4038,6 +4038,7 @@ enum {
>  #define   EDP_PSR_SKIP_AUX_EXIT			(1<<12)
>  #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL			(0<<11)
>  #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL			(1<<11)
> +#define   EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE			(1<<10) /* BDW+ */
>  #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_500us		(0<<8)
>  #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_100us		(1<<8)
>  #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_2500us		(2<<8)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index 177cd57b1029..cf72b79caf3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -360,6 +360,8 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  
>  	if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby)
>  		dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE;
> +	if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8)
> +		dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION;
>  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, dpcd_val);
>  
>  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER, DP_SET_POWER_D0);
> @@ -415,6 +417,9 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	else
>  		val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL;
>  
> +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8)
> +		val |= EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE;
> +
>  	val |= I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & EDP_PSR_RESTORE_PSR_ACTIVE_CTX_MASK;
>  	I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val);
>  }
> @@ -1032,16 +1037,19 @@ void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  		goto exit;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) {
> -		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, exiting PSR\n");
> +	if (val & (DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR | DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)) {
> +		if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)

I believe we can avoid the duplication of the conditions here...
maybe with:
if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)
//msg
else if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)
//msg
else
goto clear

intel_psr_disable_locked()

> +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, disabling PSR\n");
> +		if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)
> +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR Link CRC error, disabling PSR\n");
>  		psr_disable(intel_dp);
>  	}
> -	if (val & (DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR | DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR))
> +	if (val & DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR)
>  		DRM_ERROR("PSR_ERROR_STATUS not handled %x\n", val);

clear:
>  	/* clear status register */
>  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS, val);
>  
> -	/* TODO: handle other PSR/PSR2 errors */
> +	/* TODO: handle PSR2 errors */
>  exit:
>  	mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>
Dhinakaran Pandiyan June 14, 2018, 9:54 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 14:19 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 01:34:33PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza
> wrote:
> > 
> > Sink can be configured to calculate the CRC over the static frame
> > and
> > compare with the CRC calculated and transmited in the VSC SDP by
> > source, if there is a mismatch sink will do a short pulse in HPD
> > and set DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR in DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS.
> > 
> > Spec: 7723
> > 
> > v4:
> > patch moved to after 'drm/i915/psr: Avoid PSR exit max time
> > timeout'
> > to avoid touch in 2 patches EDP_PSR_DEBUG.
> > 
> > v3:
> > disabling PSR instead of exiting on error
> > 
> > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h  |  1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > index 140f6a27d696..ed34ccd81c7c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -4038,6 +4038,7 @@ enum {
> >  #define   EDP_PSR_SKIP_AUX_EXIT			(1<<12)
> >  #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL			(0<<11)
> >  #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL			(1<<11)
> > +#define   EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE			(1<<10) /*
> > BDW+ */
> >  #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_500us		(0<<8)
> >  #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_100us		(1<<8)
> >  #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_2500us		(2<<8)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > index 177cd57b1029..cf72b79caf3f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > @@ -360,6 +360,8 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp
> > *intel_dp)
> >  
> >  	if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby)
> >  		dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE;
> > +	if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >=
> > 8)
> > +		dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION;
> >  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG,
> > dpcd_val);
> >  
> >  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER,
> > DP_SET_POWER_D0);
> > @@ -415,6 +417,9 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp
> > *intel_dp)
> >  	else
> >  		val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL;
> >  
> > +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8)
> > +		val |= EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE;
> > +
> >  	val |= I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) &
> > EDP_PSR_RESTORE_PSR_ACTIVE_CTX_MASK;
> >  	I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val);
> >  }
> > @@ -1032,16 +1037,19 @@ void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp
> > *intel_dp)
> >  		goto exit;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) {
> > -		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, exiting
> > PSR\n");
> > +	if (val & (DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR |
> > DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)) {
> > +		if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)
> I believe we can avoid the duplication of the conditions here...
> maybe with:
> if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)
> //msg
> else if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)
> //msg
> else
> goto clear
> 
> intel_psr_disable_locked()
> 
> > 
> > +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error,
> > disabling PSR\n");
> > +		if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)
> > +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR Link CRC error,
> > disabling PSR\n");
> >  		psr_disable(intel_dp);
> >  	}
> > -	if (val & (DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR |
> > DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR))
> > +	if (val & DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR)
> >  		DRM_ERROR("PSR_ERROR_STATUS not handled %x\n",
> > val);

Shouldn't PSR be disabled for this case too? Or is this going to be
done in another patch?
Souza, Jose June 15, 2018, 12:02 a.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 14:19 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 01:34:33PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza

> wrote:

> > Sink can be configured to calculate the CRC over the static frame

> > and

> > compare with the CRC calculated and transmited in the VSC SDP by

> > source, if there is a mismatch sink will do a short pulse in HPD

> > and set DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR in DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS.

> > 

> > Spec: 7723

> > 

> > v4:

> > patch moved to after 'drm/i915/psr: Avoid PSR exit max time

> > timeout'

> > to avoid touch in 2 patches EDP_PSR_DEBUG.

> > 

> > v3:

> > disabling PSR instead of exiting on error

> > 

> > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>

> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

> > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>

> > ---

> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h  |  1 +

> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 16 ++++++++++++----

> >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

> > 

> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h

> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h

> > index 140f6a27d696..ed34ccd81c7c 100644

> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h

> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h

> > @@ -4038,6 +4038,7 @@ enum {

> >  #define   EDP_PSR_SKIP_AUX_EXIT			(1<<12)

> >  #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL			(0<<11)

> >  #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL			(1<<11)

> > +#define   EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE			(1<<10) /*

> > BDW+ */

> >  #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_500us		(0<<8)

> >  #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_100us		(1<<8)

> >  #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_2500us		(2<<8)

> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c

> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c

> > index 177cd57b1029..cf72b79caf3f 100644

> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c

> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c

> > @@ -360,6 +360,8 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp

> > *intel_dp)

> >  

> >  	if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby)

> >  		dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE;

> > +	if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >=

> > 8)

> > +		dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION;

> >  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG,

> > dpcd_val);

> >  

> >  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER,

> > DP_SET_POWER_D0);

> > @@ -415,6 +417,9 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp

> > *intel_dp)

> >  	else

> >  		val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL;

> >  

> > +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8)

> > +		val |= EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE;

> > +

> >  	val |= I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) &

> > EDP_PSR_RESTORE_PSR_ACTIVE_CTX_MASK;

> >  	I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val);

> >  }

> > @@ -1032,16 +1037,19 @@ void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp

> > *intel_dp)

> >  		goto exit;

> >  	}

> >  

> > -	if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) {

> > -		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, exiting

> > PSR\n");

> > +	if (val & (DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR |

> > DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)) {

> > +		if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)

> 

> I believe we can avoid the duplication of the conditions here...

> maybe with:

> if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)

> //msg

> else if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)

> //msg

> else

> goto clear


Well val can have all 3 errors set, so it would only print the first
debug message but I got your point, I will change to:

if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)
//msg
if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)
//msg
...

if (val)
	intel_psr_disable_locked()

as right all errors are unrecovered. This sounds good?


> 

> intel_psr_disable_locked()

> 

> > +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error,

> > disabling PSR\n");

> > +		if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)

> > +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR Link CRC error,

> > disabling PSR\n");

> >  		psr_disable(intel_dp);

> >  	}

> > -	if (val & (DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR |

> > DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR))

> > +	if (val & DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR)

> >  		DRM_ERROR("PSR_ERROR_STATUS not handled %x\n",

> > val);

> 

> clear:

> >  	/* clear status register */

> >  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS,

> > val);

> >  

> > -	/* TODO: handle other PSR/PSR2 errors */

> > +	/* TODO: handle PSR2 errors */

> >  exit:

> >  	mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);

> >  }

> > -- 

> > 2.17.1

> >
Rodrigo Vivi June 15, 2018, 5:14 a.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 05:02:41PM -0700, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 14:19 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 01:34:33PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza
> > wrote:
> > > Sink can be configured to calculate the CRC over the static frame
> > > and
> > > compare with the CRC calculated and transmited in the VSC SDP by
> > > source, if there is a mismatch sink will do a short pulse in HPD
> > > and set DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR in DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS.
> > > 
> > > Spec: 7723
> > > 
> > > v4:
> > > patch moved to after 'drm/i915/psr: Avoid PSR exit max time
> > > timeout'
> > > to avoid touch in 2 patches EDP_PSR_DEBUG.
> > > 
> > > v3:
> > > disabling PSR instead of exiting on error
> > > 
> > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h  |  1 +
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> > >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > index 140f6a27d696..ed34ccd81c7c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > @@ -4038,6 +4038,7 @@ enum {
> > >  #define   EDP_PSR_SKIP_AUX_EXIT			(1<<12)
> > >  #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL			(0<<11)
> > >  #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL			(1<<11)
> > > +#define   EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE			(1<<10) /*
> > > BDW+ */
> > >  #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_500us		(0<<8)
> > >  #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_100us		(1<<8)
> > >  #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_2500us		(2<<8)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > > index 177cd57b1029..cf72b79caf3f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > > @@ -360,6 +360,8 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > >  
> > >  	if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby)
> > >  		dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE;
> > > +	if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >=
> > > 8)
> > > +		dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION;
> > >  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG,
> > > dpcd_val);
> > >  
> > >  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER,
> > > DP_SET_POWER_D0);
> > > @@ -415,6 +417,9 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > >  	else
> > >  		val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL;
> > >  
> > > +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8)
> > > +		val |= EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE;
> > > +
> > >  	val |= I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) &
> > > EDP_PSR_RESTORE_PSR_ACTIVE_CTX_MASK;
> > >  	I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val);
> > >  }
> > > @@ -1032,16 +1037,19 @@ void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > >  		goto exit;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -	if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) {
> > > -		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, exiting
> > > PSR\n");
> > > +	if (val & (DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR |
> > > DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)) {
> > > +		if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)
> > 
> > I believe we can avoid the duplication of the conditions here...
> > maybe with:
> > if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)
> > //msg
> > else if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)
> > //msg
> > else
> > goto clear
> 
> Well val can have all 3 errors set, so it would only print the first
> debug message but I got your point, I will change to:
> 
> if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)
> //msg
> if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)
> //msg
> ...
> 
> if (val)
> 	intel_psr_disable_locked()
> 
> as right all errors are unrecovered. This sounds good?

cool, better than my goto idea ;)

> 
> 
> > 
> > intel_psr_disable_locked()
> > 
> > > +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error,
> > > disabling PSR\n");
> > > +		if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)
> > > +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR Link CRC error,
> > > disabling PSR\n");
> > >  		psr_disable(intel_dp);
> > >  	}
> > > -	if (val & (DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR |
> > > DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR))
> > > +	if (val & DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR)
> > >  		DRM_ERROR("PSR_ERROR_STATUS not handled %x\n",
> > > val);
> > 
> > clear:
> > >  	/* clear status register */
> > >  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS,
> > > val);
> > >  
> > > -	/* TODO: handle other PSR/PSR2 errors */
> > > +	/* TODO: handle PSR2 errors */
> > >  exit:
> > >  	mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
> > >  }
> > > -- 
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 140f6a27d696..ed34ccd81c7c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -4038,6 +4038,7 @@  enum {
 #define   EDP_PSR_SKIP_AUX_EXIT			(1<<12)
 #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL			(0<<11)
 #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL			(1<<11)
+#define   EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE			(1<<10) /* BDW+ */
 #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_500us		(0<<8)
 #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_100us		(1<<8)
 #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_2500us		(2<<8)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index 177cd57b1029..cf72b79caf3f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -360,6 +360,8 @@  static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 
 	if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby)
 		dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE;
+	if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8)
+		dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION;
 	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, dpcd_val);
 
 	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER, DP_SET_POWER_D0);
@@ -415,6 +417,9 @@  static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	else
 		val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL;
 
+	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8)
+		val |= EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE;
+
 	val |= I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & EDP_PSR_RESTORE_PSR_ACTIVE_CTX_MASK;
 	I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val);
 }
@@ -1032,16 +1037,19 @@  void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 		goto exit;
 	}
 
-	if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) {
-		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, exiting PSR\n");
+	if (val & (DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR | DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)) {
+		if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)
+			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, disabling PSR\n");
+		if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)
+			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR Link CRC error, disabling PSR\n");
 		psr_disable(intel_dp);
 	}
-	if (val & (DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR | DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR))
+	if (val & DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR)
 		DRM_ERROR("PSR_ERROR_STATUS not handled %x\n", val);
 	/* clear status register */
 	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS, val);
 
-	/* TODO: handle other PSR/PSR2 errors */
+	/* TODO: handle PSR2 errors */
 exit:
 	mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
 }