From patchwork Mon Jun 25 09:48:19 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Chris Wilson X-Patchwork-Id: 10485383 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43FAA603B5 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:49:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400F62881B for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:49:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 352AB2895A; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:49:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCD042881B for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:49:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8CA89E23; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:49:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from fireflyinternet.com (mail.fireflyinternet.com [109.228.58.192]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3509389C1E for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:49:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=78.156.65.138; Received: from haswell.alporthouse.com (unverified [78.156.65.138]) by fireflyinternet.com (Firefly Internet (M1)) with ESMTP id 12149650-1500050 for multiple; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:48:58 +0100 Received: by haswell.alporthouse.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:48:59 +0100 From: Chris Wilson To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:48:19 +0100 Message-Id: <20180625094842.8499-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0 In-Reply-To: <20180625094842.8499-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> References: <20180625094842.8499-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> X-Originating-IP: 78.156.65.138 X-Country: code=GB country="United Kingdom" ip=78.156.65.138 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/31] drm/i915: Move rate-limiting request retire to after submission X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Our long standing defense against a single client from flooding the system with requests (causing mempressure and stalls across the whole system) is to retire the old request on every allocation. (By retiring the oldest, we try to keep returning requests back to the system in a steady flow.) This adds an extra step into the submission path that we can reduce simply by moving it to after the submission itself. We already do try to clean up a stale request list after submission, so always retiring all completed requests fits in as a natural extension. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c index e1dbb544046f..e6e5eea87629 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c @@ -694,12 +694,6 @@ i915_request_alloc(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct i915_gem_context *ctx) if (ret) goto err_unreserve; - /* Move our oldest request to the slab-cache (if not in use!) */ - rq = list_first_entry(&ce->ring->request_list, typeof(*rq), ring_link); - if (!list_is_last(&rq->ring_link, &ce->ring->request_list) && - i915_request_completed(rq)) - i915_request_retire(rq); - /* * Beware: Dragons be flying overhead. * @@ -1110,6 +1104,8 @@ void i915_request_add(struct i915_request *request) local_bh_enable(); /* Kick the execlists tasklet if just scheduled */ /* + * Move our oldest requests to the slab-cache (if not in use!) + * * In typical scenarios, we do not expect the previous request on * the timeline to be still tracked by timeline->last_request if it * has been completed. If the completed request is still here, that @@ -1126,8 +1122,22 @@ void i915_request_add(struct i915_request *request) * work on behalf of others -- but instead we should benefit from * improved resource management. (Well, that's the theory at least.) */ - if (prev && i915_request_completed(prev)) - i915_request_retire_upto(prev); + do { + prev = list_first_entry(&ring->request_list, + typeof(*prev), ring_link); + + /* + * Keep the current request, the caller may not be + * expecting it to be retired (and freed!) immediately, + * and preserving one request from the client allows us to + * carry forward frequently reused state onto the next + * submission. + */ + if (prev == request || !i915_request_completed(prev)) + break; + + i915_request_retire(prev); + } while (1); } static unsigned long local_clock_us(unsigned int *cpu)