From patchwork Tue Jun 26 05:57:23 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tarun Vyas X-Patchwork-Id: 10487941 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2056660386 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 05:57:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FBC928720 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 05:57:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 0233828751; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 05:57:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A60AB28720 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 05:57:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910D76E352; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 05:57:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B06D66E01F for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 05:57:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Jun 2018 22:57:25 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,273,1526367600"; d="scan'208";a="51925230" Received: from otc-chromeosbuild-5.jf.intel.com ([10.54.30.37]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Jun 2018 22:57:27 -0700 From: Tarun Vyas To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 22:57:23 -0700 Message-Id: <20180626055724.167534-1-tarun.vyas@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.13.5 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 1/2] drm/i915/psr: Lockless version of psr_wait_for_idle X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP This is a lockless version of the exisiting psr_wait_for_idle(). We want to wait for PSR to idle out inside intel_pipe_update_start. At the time of a pipe update, we should never race with any psr enable or disable code, which is a part of crtc enable/disable. So, we can live w/o taking any psr locks at all. The follow up patch will use this lockless wait inside pipe_update_ start to wait for PSR to idle out before checking for vblank evasion. Even if psr is never enabled, psr2_enabled will be false and this function will wait for PSR1 to idle out, which should just return immediately, so a very short (~1-2 usec) wait for cases where PSR is disabled. v2: Add comment to explain the 25msec timeout (DK) v3: Rename psr_wait_for_idle to __psr_wait_for_idle_locked to avoid naming conflicts and propagate err (if any) to the caller (Chris) v5: Form a series with the next patch Signed-off-by: Tarun Vyas --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h index 578346b8d7e2..9cb2b8afdd3e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h @@ -1920,6 +1920,7 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state); void intel_psr_irq_control(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool debug); void intel_psr_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 psr_iir); +int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); /* intel_runtime_pm.c */ int intel_power_domains_init(struct drm_i915_private *); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c index aea81ace854b..41e6962923ae 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c @@ -757,7 +757,28 @@ void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, cancel_work_sync(&dev_priv->psr.work); } -static bool psr_wait_for_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) +int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) +{ + i915_reg_t reg; + u32 mask; + + if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) { + reg = EDP_PSR2_STATUS; + mask = EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK; + } else { + reg = EDP_PSR_STATUS; + mask = EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK; + } + + /* + * The 25 msec timeout accounts for a frame @ 60Hz refresh rate, + * exit training an aux handshake time. + */ + return intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, reg, mask, + EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_IDLE, 25); +} + +static bool __psr_wait_for_idle_locked(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { struct intel_dp *intel_dp; i915_reg_t reg; @@ -803,7 +824,7 @@ static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) * PSR might take some time to get fully disabled * and be ready for re-enable. */ - if (!psr_wait_for_idle(dev_priv)) + if (!__psr_wait_for_idle_locked(dev_priv)) goto unlock; /*