diff mbox

[27/37] drm/i915/execlists: Refactor out can_merge_rq()

Message ID 20180629075348.27358-27-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Chris Wilson June 29, 2018, 7:53 a.m. UTC
In the next patch, we add another user that wants to check whether
requests can be merge into a single HW execution, and in the future we
want to add more conditions under which requests from the same context
cannot be merge. In preparation, extract out can_merge_rq().

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index d70973c51a33..76e1cbb18827 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -553,6 +553,15 @@  static bool can_merge_ctx(const struct intel_context *prev,
 	return true;
 }
 
+static bool can_merge_rq(const struct i915_request *prev,
+			 const struct i915_request *next)
+{
+	if (!can_merge_ctx(prev->hw_context, next->hw_context))
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 static void port_assign(struct execlist_port *port, struct i915_request *rq)
 {
 	GEM_BUG_ON(rq == port_request(port));
@@ -714,8 +723,7 @@  static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 			 * second request, and so we never need to tell the
 			 * hardware about the first.
 			 */
-			if (last &&
-			    !can_merge_ctx(rq->hw_context, last->hw_context)) {
+			if (last && !can_merge_rq(rq, last)) {
 				/*
 				 * If we are on the second port and cannot
 				 * combine this request with the last, then we