@@ -1088,6 +1088,21 @@ static enum dram_rank skl_get_dimm_rank(u8 size, u32 rank)
return I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID;
}
+static bool
+skl_is_16gb_dimm(enum dram_rank rank, u8 size, u8 width)
+{
+ if (rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE && width == 8 && size == 16)
+ return true;
+ else if (rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL && width == 8 && size == 32)
+ return true;
+ else if (rank == SKL_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE && width == 16 && size == 8)
+ return true;
+ else if (rank == SKL_DRAM_RANK_DUAL && width == 16 && size == 16)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
static int
skl_dram_get_channel_info(struct dram_channel_info *ch, u32 val)
{
@@ -1125,6 +1140,11 @@ skl_dram_get_channel_info(struct dram_channel_info *ch, u32 val)
else
ch->rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE;
+ ch->is_16gb_dimm = skl_is_16gb_dimm(ch->l_info.rank, ch->l_info.size,
+ ch->l_info.width) ||
+ skl_is_16gb_dimm(ch->s_info.rank, ch->s_info.size,
+ ch->s_info.width);
+
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("(size:width:rank) L(%dGB:X%d:%s) S(%dGB:X%d:%s)\n",
ch->l_info.size, ch->l_info.width,
ch->l_info.rank ? "dual" : "single",
@@ -1157,6 +1177,8 @@ skl_dram_get_channels_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ dram_info->valid_dimm = true;
+
/*
* If any of the channel is single rank channel, worst case output
* will be same as if single rank memory, so consider single rank
@@ -1172,6 +1194,10 @@ skl_dram_get_channels_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
DRM_INFO("couldn't get memory rank information\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
+
+ if (ch0.is_16gb_dimm || ch1.is_16gb_dimm)
+ dram_info->is_16gb_dimm = true;
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1284,6 +1310,7 @@ bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ dram_info->valid_dimm = true;
dram_info->valid = true;
return 0;
}
@@ -1296,6 +1323,8 @@ intel_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
int ret;
dram_info->valid = false;
+ dram_info->valid_dimm = false;
+ dram_info->is_16gb_dimm = false;
dram_info->rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID;
dram_info->bandwidth_kbps = 0;
dram_info->num_channels = 0;
@@ -1319,9 +1348,9 @@ intel_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
sprintf(bandwidth_str, "unknown");
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRAM bandwidth:%s, total-channels: %u\n",
bandwidth_str, dram_info->num_channels);
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRAM rank: %s rank\n",
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRAM rank: %s rank 16GB-dimm:%s\n",
(dram_info->rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL) ?
- "dual" : "single");
+ "dual" : "single", yesno(dram_info->is_16gb_dimm));
}
/**
@@ -1946,6 +1946,8 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
struct dram_info {
bool valid;
+ bool valid_dimm;
+ bool is_16gb_dimm;
u8 num_channels;
enum dram_rank {
I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID = 0,
@@ -2174,6 +2176,7 @@ struct dram_channel_info {
enum dram_rank rank;
} l_info, s_info;
enum dram_rank rank;
+ bool is_16gb_dimm;
};
static inline struct drm_i915_private *to_i915(const struct drm_device *dev)
@@ -2875,6 +2875,16 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
}
}
+ /*
+ * WA Level-0 adjustment for 16GB DIMMs: SKL+
+ * If we could not get dimm info enable this WA to prevent from
+ * any underrun. If not able to get Dimm info assume 16GB dimm
+ * to avoid any underrun.
+ */
+ if (!dev_priv->dram_info.valid_dimm ||
+ dev_priv->dram_info.is_16gb_dimm)
+ wm[0] += 1;
+
} else if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) {
uint64_t sskpd = I915_READ64(MCH_SSKPD);
Memory with 16GB dimms require an increase of 1us in level-0 latency. This patch implements the same. Bspec: 4381 changes since V1: - s/memdev_info/dram_info - make skl_is_16gb_dimm pure function Changes since V2: - make is_16gb_dimm more generic - rebase Changes since V3: - Simplify condition (Maarten) Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 10 ++++++++++ 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)