From patchwork Thu Jan 10 19:57:43 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Lyude Paul X-Patchwork-Id: 10756741 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE90F6C5 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C39529CF2 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 8FEF929C18; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:00:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1088329D24 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8863B6F45D; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:59:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E6286F448; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:59:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 053F713A5C; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:59:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from malachite.bss.redhat.com (dhcp-10-20-1-11.bss.redhat.com [10.20.1.11]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D267F1A9; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:59:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Lyude Paul To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 14:57:43 -0500 Message-Id: <20190110195753.6234-10-lyude@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190110195753.6234-1-lyude@redhat.com> References: <20190110195753.6234-1-lyude@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:59:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 09/20] drm/dp_mst: Fix payload deallocation on hotplugs using malloc refs X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Vetter , Jerry Zuo , David Airlie , Harry Wentland Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Up until now, freeing payloads on remote MST hubs that just had ports removed has almost never worked because we've been relying on port validation in order to stop us from accessing ports that have already been freed from memory, but ports which need their payloads released due to being removed will never be a valid part of the topology after they've been removed. Since we've introduced malloc refs, we can replace all of the validation logic in payload helpers which are used for deallocation with some well-placed malloc krefs. This ensures that regardless of whether or not the ports are still valid and in the topology, any port which has an allocated payload will remain allocated in memory until it's payloads have been removed - finally allowing us to actually release said payloads correctly. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland Cc: David Airlie Cc: Jerry Zuo Cc: Juston Li --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 54 +++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c index bb9107852fed..b5976f8c318c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c @@ -2095,10 +2095,6 @@ static int drm_dp_payload_send_msg(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, u8 sinks[DRM_DP_MAX_SDP_STREAMS]; int i; - port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr, port); - if (!port) - return -EINVAL; - port_num = port->port_num; mstb = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_mstb_validated(mgr, port->parent); if (!mstb) { @@ -2106,10 +2102,8 @@ static int drm_dp_payload_send_msg(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, port->parent, &port_num); - if (!mstb) { - drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port); + if (!mstb) return -EINVAL; - } } txmsg = kzalloc(sizeof(*txmsg), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -2146,7 +2140,6 @@ static int drm_dp_payload_send_msg(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, kfree(txmsg); fail_put: drm_dp_mst_topology_put_mstb(mstb); - drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port); return ret; } @@ -2251,15 +2244,16 @@ static int drm_dp_destroy_payload_step2(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, */ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr) { - int i, j; - int cur_slots = 1; struct drm_dp_payload req_payload; struct drm_dp_mst_port *port; + int i, j; + int cur_slots = 1; mutex_lock(&mgr->payload_lock); for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) { struct drm_dp_vcpi *vcpi = mgr->proposed_vcpis[i]; struct drm_dp_payload *payload = &mgr->payloads[i]; + bool put_port = false; /* solve the current payloads - compare to the hw ones - update the hw view */ @@ -2267,12 +2261,20 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr) if (vcpi) { port = container_of(vcpi, struct drm_dp_mst_port, vcpi); - port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr, - port); - if (!port) { - mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock); - return -EINVAL; + + /* Validated ports don't matter if we're releasing + * VCPI + */ + if (vcpi->num_slots) { + port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated( + mgr, port); + if (!port) { + mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock); + return -EINVAL; + } + put_port = true; } + req_payload.num_slots = vcpi->num_slots; req_payload.vcpi = vcpi->vcpi; } else { @@ -2304,7 +2306,7 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr) } cur_slots += req_payload.num_slots; - if (port) + if (put_port) drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port); } @@ -3120,6 +3122,8 @@ bool drm_dp_mst_allocate_vcpi(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, DRM_DEBUG_KMS("initing vcpi for pbn=%d slots=%d\n", pbn, port->vcpi.num_slots); + /* Keep port allocated until it's payload has been removed */ + drm_dp_mst_get_port_malloc(port); drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port); return true; out: @@ -3149,11 +3153,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_get_vcpi_slots); */ void drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, struct drm_dp_mst_port *port) { - port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr, port); - if (!port) - return; + /* + * A port with VCPI will remain allocated until it's VCPI is + * released, no verified ref needed + */ + port->vcpi.num_slots = 0; - drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots); @@ -3165,16 +3170,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots); void drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, struct drm_dp_mst_port *port) { - port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr, port); - if (!port) - return; + /* + * A port with VCPI will remain allocated until it's VCPI is + * released, no verified ref needed + */ drm_dp_mst_put_payload_id(mgr, port->vcpi.vcpi); port->vcpi.num_slots = 0; port->vcpi.pbn = 0; port->vcpi.aligned_pbn = 0; port->vcpi.vcpi = 0; - drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port); + drm_dp_mst_put_port_malloc(port); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi);