From patchwork Mon Feb 4 13:22:11 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Chris Wilson X-Patchwork-Id: 10795671 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A01C922 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 13:40:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297D52A868 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 13:40:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 277612AF5E; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 13:40:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C75CF2A868 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 13:40:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5180E6E4FA; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 13:40:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from fireflyinternet.com (mail.fireflyinternet.com [109.228.58.192]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 671896E4FA for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 13:40:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=78.156.65.138; Received: from haswell.alporthouse.com (unverified [78.156.65.138]) by fireflyinternet.com (Firefly Internet (M1)) with ESMTP id 15458872-1500050 for multiple; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 13:22:27 +0000 From: Chris Wilson To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 13:22:11 +0000 Message-Id: <20190204132214.9459-20-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190204132214.9459-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> References: <20190204132214.9459-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/22] drm/i915/execlists: Refactor out can_merge_rq() X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP In the next patch, we add another user that wants to check whether requests can be merge into a single HW execution, and in the future we want to add more conditions under which requests from the same context cannot be merge. In preparation, extract out can_merge_rq(). v2: Reorder tests to decide if we can continue filling ELSP and bonus comments. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c index e37f207afb5a..66d465708bc6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c @@ -285,12 +285,11 @@ static inline bool need_preempt(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine, } __maybe_unused static inline bool -assert_priority_queue(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, - const struct i915_request *prev, +assert_priority_queue(const struct i915_request *prev, const struct i915_request *next) { - if (!prev) - return true; + const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists = + &prev->engine->execlists; /* * Without preemption, the prev may refer to the still active element @@ -601,6 +600,17 @@ static bool can_merge_ctx(const struct intel_context *prev, return true; } +static bool can_merge_rq(const struct i915_request *prev, + const struct i915_request *next) +{ + GEM_BUG_ON(!assert_priority_queue(prev, next)); + + if (!can_merge_ctx(prev->hw_context, next->hw_context)) + return false; + + return true; +} + static void port_assign(struct execlist_port *port, struct i915_request *rq) { GEM_BUG_ON(rq == port_request(port)); @@ -753,8 +763,6 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) int i; priolist_for_each_request_consume(rq, rn, p, i) { - GEM_BUG_ON(!assert_priority_queue(execlists, last, rq)); - /* * Can we combine this request with the current port? * It has to be the same context/ringbuffer and not @@ -766,8 +774,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) * second request, and so we never need to tell the * hardware about the first. */ - if (last && - !can_merge_ctx(rq->hw_context, last->hw_context)) { + if (last && !can_merge_rq(last, rq)) { /* * If we are on the second port and cannot * combine this request with the last, then we @@ -776,6 +783,14 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) if (port == last_port) goto done; + /* + * We must not populate both ELSP[] with the + * same LRCA, i.e. we must submit 2 different + * contexts if we submit 2 ELSP. + */ + if (last->hw_context == rq->hw_context) + goto done; + /* * If GVT overrides us we only ever submit * port[0], leaving port[1] empty. Note that we @@ -787,7 +802,6 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) ctx_single_port_submission(rq->hw_context)) goto done; - GEM_BUG_ON(last->hw_context == rq->hw_context); if (submit) port_assign(port, last); @@ -826,8 +840,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) * request triggering preemption on the next dequeue (or subsequent * interrupt for secondary ports). */ - execlists->queue_priority_hint = - port != execlists->port ? rq_prio(last) : INT_MIN; + execlists->queue_priority_hint = queue_prio(execlists); if (submit) { port_assign(port, last);