From patchwork Thu Jul 25 23:56:42 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Lucas De Marchi X-Patchwork-Id: 11060017 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C000B112C for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 23:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF97D288B6 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 23:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id A394E28A6F; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 23:57:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40176288B6 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 23:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2549F6E83F; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 23:57:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C4DF6E839 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 23:57:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Jul 2019 16:57:01 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,308,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="178178562" Received: from ldmartin-desk1.jf.intel.com (HELO ldmartin-desk1.intel.com) ([10.24.9.40]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Jul 2019 16:56:55 -0700 From: Lucas De Marchi To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 16:56:42 -0700 Message-Id: <20190725235643.6870-5-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190725235643.6870-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> References: <20190725235643.6870-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/tgl: start adding the DKL PLLs to use on TC ports X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP The disable function can be the same as for MG phy since the same registers are used. The others are different as registers change - prepare for that using an empty dkl_pll_write() to be implemented later. Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c index 3a1348ea6714..049b68e0c61c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c @@ -3158,6 +3158,60 @@ static bool mg_pll_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, return ret; } +static bool dkl_pll_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll, + struct intel_dpll_hw_state *hw_state) +{ + const enum intel_dpll_id id = pll->info->id; + enum tc_port tc_port = icl_pll_id_to_tc_port(id); + intel_wakeref_t wakeref; + bool ret = false; + u32 val; + + wakeref = intel_display_power_get_if_enabled(dev_priv, + POWER_DOMAIN_DISPLAY_CORE); + if (!wakeref) + return false; + + val = I915_READ(MG_PLL_ENABLE(tc_port)); + if (!(val & PLL_ENABLE)) + goto out; + + /* + * All registers read here have the same HIP_INDEX_REG even though + * they are on different building blocks + */ + I915_WRITE(HIP_INDEX_REG(tc_port), 0x2); + + hw_state->mg_refclkin_ctl = I915_READ(DKL_REFCLKIN_CTL(tc_port)); + hw_state->mg_refclkin_ctl &= MG_REFCLKIN_CTL_OD_2_MUX_MASK; + + hw_state->mg_clktop2_hsclkctl = + I915_READ(DKL_CLKTOP2_HSCLKCTL(tc_port)); + hw_state->mg_clktop2_hsclkctl &= + MG_CLKTOP2_HSCLKCTL_TLINEDRV_CLKSEL_MASK | + MG_CLKTOP2_HSCLKCTL_CORE_INPUTSEL_MASK | + MG_CLKTOP2_HSCLKCTL_HSDIV_RATIO_MASK | + MG_CLKTOP2_HSCLKCTL_DSDIV_RATIO_MASK; + + hw_state->mg_clktop2_coreclkctl1 = + I915_READ(DKL_CLKTOP2_CORECLKCTL1(tc_port)); + hw_state->mg_clktop2_coreclkctl1 &= + MG_CLKTOP2_CORECLKCTL1_A_DIVRATIO_MASK; + + hw_state->mg_pll_div0 = I915_READ(DKL_PLL_DIV0(tc_port)); + hw_state->mg_pll_div1 = I915_READ(DKL_PLL_DIV1(tc_port)); + hw_state->mg_pll_ssc = I915_READ(DKL_PLL_SSC(tc_port)); + hw_state->mg_pll_bias = I915_READ(DKL_PLL_BIAS(tc_port)); + hw_state->mg_pll_tdc_coldst_bias = + I915_READ(DKL_PLL_TDC_COLDST_BIAS(tc_port)); + + ret = true; +out: + intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_DISPLAY_CORE, wakeref); + return ret; +} + static bool icl_pll_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, struct intel_shared_dpll *pll, struct intel_dpll_hw_state *hw_state, @@ -3292,6 +3346,12 @@ static void icl_mg_pll_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, POSTING_READ(MG_PLL_TDC_COLDST_BIAS(tc_port)); } +static void dkl_pll_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll) +{ + /* TODO */ +} + static void icl_pll_power_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, struct intel_shared_dpll *pll, i915_reg_t enable_reg) @@ -3399,6 +3459,31 @@ static void mg_pll_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, /* DVFS post sequence would be here. See the comment above. */ } +static void dkl_pll_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll) +{ + /* + * From spec: MG register instances are being used for TypeC in general. The + * same MG register instances should be programmed for Dekel PLLs as well + */ + i915_reg_t enable_reg = + MG_PLL_ENABLE(icl_pll_id_to_tc_port(pll->info->id)); + + icl_pll_power_enable(dev_priv, pll, enable_reg); + + dkl_pll_write(dev_priv, pll); + + /* + * DVFS pre sequence would be here, but in our driver the cdclk code + * paths should already be setting the appropriate voltage, hence we do + * nothing here. + */ + + icl_pll_enable(dev_priv, pll, enable_reg); + + /* DVFS post sequence would be here. See the comment above. */ +} + static void icl_pll_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, struct intel_shared_dpll *pll, i915_reg_t enable_reg) @@ -3543,11 +3628,22 @@ static const struct intel_dpll_mgr ehl_pll_mgr = { .dump_hw_state = icl_dump_hw_state, }; +static const struct intel_shared_dpll_funcs dkl_pll_funcs = { + .enable = dkl_pll_enable, + .disable = mg_pll_disable, + .get_hw_state = dkl_pll_get_hw_state, +}; + static const struct dpll_info tgl_plls[] = { { "DPLL 0", &combo_pll_funcs, DPLL_ID_ICL_DPLL0, 0 }, { "DPLL 1", &combo_pll_funcs, DPLL_ID_ICL_DPLL1, 0 }, { "TBT PLL", &tbt_pll_funcs, DPLL_ID_ICL_TBTPLL, 0 }, - /* TODO: Add typeC plls */ + { "TC PLL 1", &dkl_pll_funcs, DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL1, 0 }, + { "TC PLL 2", &dkl_pll_funcs, DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL2, 0 }, + { "TC PLL 3", &dkl_pll_funcs, DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL3, 0 }, + { "TC PLL 4", &dkl_pll_funcs, DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL4, 0 }, + { "TC PLL 5", &dkl_pll_funcs, DPLL_ID_TGL_MGPLL5, 0 }, + { "TC PLL 6", &dkl_pll_funcs, DPLL_ID_TGL_MGPLL6, 0 }, { }, };