@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ void intel_pipe_update_start(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
crtc->debug.min_vbl = min;
crtc->debug.max_vbl = max;
- trace_i915_pipe_update_start(crtc);
+ trace_intel_pipe_update_start(crtc);
for (;;) {
/*
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ void intel_pipe_update_start(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
crtc->debug.start_vbl_time = ktime_get();
crtc->debug.start_vbl_count = intel_crtc_get_vblank_counter(crtc);
- trace_i915_pipe_update_vblank_evaded(crtc);
+ trace_intel_pipe_update_vblank_evaded(crtc);
return;
irq_disable:
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ void intel_pipe_update_end(struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
ktime_t end_vbl_time = ktime_get();
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
- trace_i915_pipe_update_end(crtc, end_vbl_count, scanline_end);
+ trace_intel_pipe_update_end(crtc, end_vbl_count, scanline_end);
/* We're still in the vblank-evade critical section, this can't race.
* Would be slightly nice to just grab the vblank count and arm the
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(intel_fbc_nuke,
/* pipe updates */
-TRACE_EVENT(i915_pipe_update_start,
+TRACE_EVENT(intel_pipe_update_start,
TP_PROTO(struct intel_crtc *crtc),
TP_ARGS(crtc),
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_pipe_update_start,
__entry->scanline, __entry->min, __entry->max)
);
-TRACE_EVENT(i915_pipe_update_vblank_evaded,
+TRACE_EVENT(intel_pipe_update_vblank_evaded,
TP_PROTO(struct intel_crtc *crtc),
TP_ARGS(crtc),
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_pipe_update_vblank_evaded,
__entry->scanline, __entry->min, __entry->max)
);
-TRACE_EVENT(i915_pipe_update_end,
+TRACE_EVENT(intel_pipe_update_end,
TP_PROTO(struct intel_crtc *crtc, u32 frame, int scanline_end),
TP_ARGS(crtc, frame, scanline_end),