Message ID | 20200217184219.15325-1-jani.nikula@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | drm/i915/gem: use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock | expand |
Quoting Jani Nikula (2020-02-17 18:42:19) > spinlock_t is one case where the typedef is to be preferred over struct > spinlock. > > Fixes: 42fb60de3129 ("drm/i915/gem: Don't leak non-persistent requests on changing engines") > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> If you say so, Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> If you look you might find a few more I've added ;) -Chris
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > Quoting Jani Nikula (2020-02-17 18:42:19) >> spinlock_t is one case where the typedef is to be preferred over struct >> spinlock. >> >> Fixes: 42fb60de3129 ("drm/i915/gem: Don't leak non-persistent requests on changing engines") >> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> >> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> > > If you say so, Checkpatch and a git grep popularity contest in the kernel tree say so... > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Thanks! > If you look you might find a few more I've added ;) Oh? My git grep fails me then. BR, Jani.
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: >> Quoting Jani Nikula (2020-02-17 18:42:19) >>> spinlock_t is one case where the typedef is to be preferred over struct >>> spinlock. >>> >>> Fixes: 42fb60de3129 ("drm/i915/gem: Don't leak non-persistent requests on changing engines") >>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> >>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> >> >> If you say so, > > Checkpatch and a git grep popularity contest in the kernel tree say > so... > >> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > Thanks! And pushed. BR, Jani. > >> If you look you might find a few more I've added ;) > > Oh? My git grep fails me then. > > BR, > Jani.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h index b9a1d54a4643..28760bd03265 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ struct i915_gem_context { char name[TASK_COMM_LEN + 8]; struct { - struct spinlock lock; + spinlock_t lock; struct list_head engines; } stale; };
spinlock_t is one case where the typedef is to be preferred over struct spinlock. Fixes: 42fb60de3129 ("drm/i915/gem: Don't leak non-persistent requests on changing engines") Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)