@@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ __intel_engine_init_ctx_wa(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
else if (INTEL_GEN(i915) < 8)
return;
else
- MISSING_CASE(INTEL_GEN(i915));
+ i915_MISSING_CASE(i915, INTEL_GEN(i915));
wa_init_finish(wal);
}
@@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ gt_init_workarounds(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
else if (INTEL_GEN(i915) <= 8)
return;
else
- MISSING_CASE(INTEL_GEN(i915));
+ i915_MISSING_CASE(i915, INTEL_GEN(i915));
}
void intel_gt_init_workarounds(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
@@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ void intel_engine_init_whitelist(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
else if (INTEL_GEN(i915) <= 8)
return;
else
- MISSING_CASE(INTEL_GEN(i915));
+ i915_MISSING_CASE(i915, INTEL_GEN(i915));
wa_init_finish(w);
}
i915_MISSING_CASE macro includes the device information in the backtrace, so we know what device the warnings originate from. Covert MISSING_CASE calls with i915 specific i915_MISSING_CASE variant in functions where drm_i915_private struct pointer is readily available. The conversion was done automatically with below coccinelle semantic patch. @rule1@ identifier func, T; @@ func(...) { ... struct drm_i915_private *T = ...; <... -MISSING_CASE( +i915_MISSING_CASE(T, ...) ...> } @rule2@ identifier func, T; @@ func(struct drm_i915_private *T,...) { <... -MISSING_CASE( +i915_MISSING_CASE(T, ...) ...> } Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)