From patchwork Tue Mar 10 21:42:00 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Francisco Jerez X-Patchwork-Id: 11430351 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAEBA18E8 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B93E2215A4 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=riseup.net header.i=@riseup.net header.b="BEQDPbgw" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B93E2215A4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=riseup.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C966E8E2; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:52:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAC776E4F1 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:52:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bell.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cTDw0378zFf59; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:46:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1583876784; bh=ltwuhymiRp0VE2eGHyBbW5dhX5HoTXYQ8tBDbkFknOM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=BEQDPbgw4AFgInKuxEXiyG6FyPYZvsQhtCWhvbRFbNd1QwRwlwiaAucd5RGHSlcvb +nwClGR6I18+Jef9P791Em/n0bngfm31Vd/R9TnNzvW8T/65UHLhtjtIAp30kxszpe 6xw6eKaGNg5QyLmzoVaZm/E2rOBI3pWsPvGibZFg= X-Riseup-User-ID: 27D01099CFA45474A2CF5CDB74DB5D1B94D423BF3BF6EE795CB3C483527536A2 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48cTDv5PBzzJs07; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:46:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Francisco Jerez To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:42:00 -0700 Message-Id: <20200310214203.26459-8-currojerez@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: <20200310214203.26459-1-currojerez@riseup.net> References: <20200310214203.26459-1-currojerez@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement VLP controller for HWP parts. X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Zijlstra , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Pandruvada, Srinivas" Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" This implements a simple variably low-pass-filtering governor in control of the HWP MIN/MAX PERF range based on the previously introduced get_vlp_target_range(). See "cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement VLP controller target P-state range estimation." for the rationale. Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez --- drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c index cecadfec8bc1..a01eed40d897 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c @@ -1905,6 +1905,20 @@ static void intel_pstate_reset_vlp(struct cpudata *cpu) vlp->gain = max(1, div_fp(1000, vlp_params.setpoint_0_pml)); vlp->target.p_base = 0; vlp->stats.last_response_frequency_hz = vlp_params.avg_hz; + + if (hwp_active) { + const uint32_t p0 = max(cpu->pstate.min_pstate, + cpu->min_perf_ratio); + const uint32_t p1 = max_t(uint32_t, p0, cpu->max_perf_ratio); + const uint64_t hwp_req = (READ_ONCE(cpu->hwp_req_cached) & + ~(HWP_MAX_PERF(~0L) | + HWP_MIN_PERF(~0L) | + HWP_DESIRED_PERF(~0L))) | + HWP_MIN_PERF(p0) | HWP_MAX_PERF(p1); + + wrmsrl_on_cpu(cpu->cpu, MSR_HWP_REQUEST, hwp_req); + cpu->hwp_req_cached = hwp_req; + } } /** @@ -2222,6 +2236,46 @@ static void intel_pstate_adjust_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu) fp_toint(cpu->iowait_boost * 100)); } +static void intel_pstate_adjust_pstate_range(struct cpudata *cpu, + const unsigned int range[]) +{ + const int from = cpu->hwp_req_cached; + unsigned int p0, p1, p_min, p_max; + struct sample *sample; + uint64_t hwp_req; + + update_turbo_state(); + + p0 = max(cpu->pstate.min_pstate, cpu->min_perf_ratio); + p1 = max_t(unsigned int, p0, cpu->max_perf_ratio); + p_min = clamp_t(unsigned int, range[0], p0, p1); + p_max = clamp_t(unsigned int, range[1], p0, p1); + + trace_cpu_frequency(p_max * cpu->pstate.scaling, cpu->cpu); + + hwp_req = (READ_ONCE(cpu->hwp_req_cached) & + ~(HWP_MAX_PERF(~0L) | HWP_MIN_PERF(~0L) | + HWP_DESIRED_PERF(~0L))) | + HWP_MIN_PERF(vlp_params.debug & 2 ? p0 : p_min) | + HWP_MAX_PERF(vlp_params.debug & 4 ? p1 : p_max); + + if (hwp_req != cpu->hwp_req_cached) { + wrmsrl(MSR_HWP_REQUEST, hwp_req); + cpu->hwp_req_cached = hwp_req; + } + + sample = &cpu->sample; + trace_pstate_sample(mul_ext_fp(100, sample->core_avg_perf), + fp_toint(sample->busy_scaled), + from, + hwp_req, + sample->mperf, + sample->aperf, + sample->tsc, + get_avg_frequency(cpu), + fp_toint(cpu->iowait_boost * 100)); +} + static void intel_pstate_update_util(struct update_util_data *data, u64 time, unsigned int flags) { @@ -2260,6 +2314,22 @@ static void intel_pstate_update_util(struct update_util_data *data, u64 time, intel_pstate_adjust_pstate(cpu); } +/** + * Implementation of the cpufreq update_util hook based on the VLP + * controller (see get_vlp_target_range()). + */ +static void intel_pstate_update_util_hwp_vlp(struct update_util_data *data, + u64 time, unsigned int flags) +{ + struct cpudata *cpu = container_of(data, struct cpudata, update_util); + + if (update_vlp_sample(cpu, time, flags)) { + const struct vlp_target_range *target = + get_vlp_target_range(cpu); + intel_pstate_adjust_pstate_range(cpu, target->value); + } +} + static struct pstate_funcs core_funcs = { .get_max = core_get_max_pstate, .get_max_physical = core_get_max_pstate_physical, @@ -2389,6 +2459,9 @@ static int intel_pstate_init_cpu(unsigned int cpunum) intel_pstate_get_cpu_pstates(cpu); + if (pstate_funcs.update_util == intel_pstate_update_util_hwp_vlp) + intel_pstate_reset_vlp(cpu); + pr_debug("controlling: cpu %d\n", cpunum); return 0; @@ -2398,7 +2471,8 @@ static void intel_pstate_set_update_util_hook(unsigned int cpu_num) { struct cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[cpu_num]; - if (hwp_active && !hwp_boost) + if (hwp_active && !hwp_boost && + pstate_funcs.update_util != intel_pstate_update_util_hwp_vlp) return; if (cpu->update_util_set) @@ -2526,7 +2600,8 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) * was turned off, in that case we need to clear the * update util hook. */ - if (!hwp_boost) + if (!hwp_boost && pstate_funcs.update_util != + intel_pstate_update_util_hwp_vlp) intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook(policy->cpu); intel_pstate_hwp_set(policy->cpu); }