Message ID | 20200714152626.380-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/4] drm/i915: Pack struct intel_cdclk_vals | expand |
Quoting Ville Syrjala (2020-07-14 16:26:25) > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > Explicitly check for i830 when assigning the .get_cdclk() vfunc, > and then deal with the case of not having assigned the vfunc > separately. Less confusing, and gets rid of the checkpatch complaint > about using {} on one branch but not the others. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> -Chris
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c index 72095ef14426..9d6cacbdb691 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c @@ -2903,9 +2903,10 @@ void intel_init_cdclk_hooks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) dev_priv->display.get_cdclk = i85x_get_cdclk; else if (IS_I845G(dev_priv)) dev_priv->display.get_cdclk = fixed_200mhz_get_cdclk; - else { /* 830 */ - drm_WARN(&dev_priv->drm, !IS_I830(dev_priv), - "Unknown platform. Assuming 133 MHz CDCLK\n"); + else if (IS_I830(dev_priv)) + dev_priv->display.get_cdclk = fixed_133mhz_get_cdclk; + + if (drm_WARN(&dev_priv->drm, !dev_priv->display.get_cdclk, + "Unknown platform. Assuming 133 MHz CDCLK\n")) dev_priv->display.get_cdclk = fixed_133mhz_get_cdclk; - } }