@@ -126,8 +126,8 @@ static void device_unplug(struct hotunplug *priv, const char *prefix)
igt_reset_timeout();
priv->fd.sysfs_dev = local_close(priv->fd.sysfs_dev);
- igt_warn_on_f(priv->fd.sysfs_dev != -1,
- "Device sysfs node close failed\n");
+ igt_assert_f(priv->fd.sysfs_dev == -1,
+ "Device sysfs node close failed\n");
}
/* Re-discover the device by rescanning its bus */
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static void hotunbind_lateclose(struct hotunplug *priv)
igt_debug("late closing the unbound device instance\n");
priv->fd.drm = local_close(priv->fd.drm);
- igt_warn_on_f(priv->fd.drm != -1, "Device close failed\n");
+ igt_assert_f(priv->fd.drm == -1, "Device close failed\n");
}
static void hotunplug_lateclose(struct hotunplug *priv)
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static void hotunplug_lateclose(struct hotunplug *priv)
igt_debug("late closing the removed device instance\n");
priv->fd.drm = local_close(priv->fd.drm);
- igt_warn_on_f(priv->fd.drm != -1, "Device close failed\n");
+ igt_assert_f(priv->fd.drm == -1, "Device close failed\n");
}
/* Main */
Since health checks are now run from follow-up fixture sections, it is safe to fail subtests without the need to abort the test execution. Do that on device close errors instead of emitting warnings. Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> --- tests/core_hotunplug.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)