@@ -756,7 +756,7 @@ __intel_engine_init_ctx_wa(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
else if (IS_GEN(i915, 6))
gen6_ctx_workarounds_init(engine, wal);
else if (INTEL_GEN(i915) < 8)
- return;
+ ;
else
MISSING_CASE(INTEL_GEN(i915));
@@ -1208,7 +1208,7 @@ gt_init_workarounds(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
else if (IS_GEN(i915, 4))
gen4_gt_workarounds_init(i915, wal);
else if (INTEL_GEN(i915) <= 8)
- return;
+ ;
else
MISSING_CASE(INTEL_GEN(i915));
}
@@ -1583,7 +1583,7 @@ void intel_engine_init_whitelist(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
else if (IS_SKYLAKE(i915))
skl_whitelist_build(engine);
else if (INTEL_GEN(i915) <= 8)
- return;
+ ;
else
MISSING_CASE(INTEL_GEN(i915));
Checkpatch worries that the 'return' before an else clause might be redundant. In this case, it is avoiding hitting the MISSING_CASE() warning. Let us appease checkpatch by falling through to the end of the function, which typically means that we then clean up the unused wa_list. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)