[4/7] drm/i915: Handle async cancellation in sentinel assert

Commit Message

Tvrtko Ursulin March 24, 2021, 12:13 p.m. UTC

From: Tvrtko Ursulin <[e-mail]>

With the watchdog cancelling requests asynchronously to preempt-to-busy we
need to relax one assert making it apply only to requests not in error.

v2:
 * Check against the correct request!

v3:
 * Simplify the check to avoid the question of when to sample the fence
   error vs sentinel bit.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[e-mail]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Matthew Auld March 24, 2021, 5:22 p.m. UTC | #1

On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 12:14, Tvrtko Ursulin
<[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <[e-mail]>
>
> With the watchdog cancelling requests asynchronously to preempt-to-busy we
> need to relax one assert making it apply only to requests not in error.
>
> v2:
>  * Check against the correct request!
>
> v3:
>  * Simplify the check to avoid the question of when to sample the fence
>    error vs sentinel bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[e-mail]>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <[e-mail]>

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
index 4b870eca9693..9d264d4ffa75 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
@@ -700,9 +700,8 @@  assert_pending_valid(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists,
 {
 	struct intel_engine_cs *engine =
 		container_of(execlists, typeof(*engine), execlists);
-	struct i915_request * const *port, *rq;
+	struct i915_request * const *port, *rq, *prev = NULL;
 	struct intel_context *ce = NULL;
-	bool sentinel = false;
 	u32 ccid = -1;
 
 	trace_ports(execlists, msg, execlists->pending);
@@ -752,15 +751,20 @@  assert_pending_valid(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists,
 		 * Sentinels are supposed to be the last request so they flush
 		 * the current execution off the HW. Check that they are the only
 		 * request in the pending submission.
+		 *
+		 * NB: Due to the async nature of preempt-to-busy and request
+		 * cancellation we need to handle the case where request
+		 * becomes a sentinel in parallel to CSB processing.
 		 */
-		if (sentinel) {
+		if (prev && i915_request_has_sentinel(prev) &&
+		    !READ_ONCE(prev->fence.error)) {
 			GEM_TRACE_ERR("%s: context:%llx after sentinel in pending[%zd]\n",
 				      engine->name,
 				      ce->timeline->fence_context,
 				      port - execlists->pending);
 			return false;
 		}
-		sentinel = i915_request_has_sentinel(rq);
+		prev = rq;
 
 		/*
 		 * We want virtual requests to only be in the first slot so