Message ID | 20210701193114.17531-2-anusha.srivatsa@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Stepping/substepping reorg for DMC | expand |
Hi Anusha,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on drm-tip/drm-tip]
[also build test WARNING on next-20210701]
[cannot apply to drm-intel/for-linux-next v5.13]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Anusha-Srivatsa/Stepping-substepping-reorg-for-DMC/20210702-033236
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip
config: x86_64-randconfig-a015-20210630 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 13.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9eb613b2de3163686b1a4bd1160f15ac56a4b083)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install x86_64 cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/5d13218aefcba8e3bc4c4d4371988e08e0cf8bd3
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Anusha-Srivatsa/Stepping-substepping-reorg-for-DMC/20210702-033236
git checkout 5d13218aefcba8e3bc4c4d4371988e08e0cf8bd3
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=x86_64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c:250:35: warning: unused variable 'no_stepping_info' [-Wunused-const-variable]
static const struct stepping_info no_stepping_info = { '*', '*' };
^
1 warning generated.
vim +/no_stepping_info +250 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
03256487fee340 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c Anusha Srivatsa 2021-05-26 249
1bb4308e713042 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c Chris Wilson 2016-03-07 @250 static const struct stepping_info no_stepping_info = { '*', '*' };
5d13218aefcba8 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c Anusha Srivatsa 2021-07-01 251 struct stepping_info *display_step;
1bb4308e713042 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c Chris Wilson 2016-03-07 252
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
On Thu, 01 Jul 2021, Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> wrote: > On the dmc side,we maintain a lookup table with different display > stepping-substepping combinations. > > Instead of adding new table for every new platform, lets ues > the stepping info from RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->step > > v2: Add stepping table for older platforms in intel_step.c (Lucas) > > Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 117 +++++++++++++++-------- The changes here... > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c | 41 ++++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h | 7 ++ ...should be separate from, and depend on, the changes here. Please don't try to do too much in one patch. Smaller is better. > 3 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c > index f8789d4543bf..df888a3d086e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c > @@ -247,50 +247,89 @@ bool intel_dmc_has_payload(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > return i915->dmc.dmc_info[DMC_FW_MAIN].payload; > } > > -static const struct stepping_info skl_stepping_info[] = { > - {'A', '0'}, {'B', '0'}, {'C', '0'}, > - {'D', '0'}, {'E', '0'}, {'F', '0'}, > - {'G', '0'}, {'H', '0'}, {'I', '0'}, > - {'J', '0'}, {'K', '0'} > -}; > - > -static const struct stepping_info bxt_stepping_info[] = { > - {'A', '0'}, {'A', '1'}, {'A', '2'}, > - {'B', '0'}, {'B', '1'}, {'B', '2'} > -}; > - > -static const struct stepping_info icl_stepping_info[] = { > - {'A', '0'}, {'A', '1'}, {'A', '2'}, > - {'B', '0'}, {'B', '2'}, > - {'C', '0'} > -}; > - > static const struct stepping_info no_stepping_info = { '*', '*' }; > +struct stepping_info *display_step; > > -static const struct stepping_info * > +static struct stepping_info * > intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > { > - const struct stepping_info *si; > - unsigned int size; > - > - if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) { > - size = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_stepping_info); > - si = icl_stepping_info; > - } else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) { > - size = ARRAY_SIZE(skl_stepping_info); > - si = skl_stepping_info; > - } else if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) { > - size = ARRAY_SIZE(bxt_stepping_info); > - si = bxt_stepping_info; > - } else { > - size = 0; > - si = NULL; > + struct intel_step_info step = RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->step; > + > + switch (step.display_step) { > + case STEP_A0: > + display_step->stepping = 'A'; > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > + break; > + case STEP_A1: > + display_step->stepping = 'A'; > + display_step->substepping = '1'; > + break; > + case STEP_A2: > + display_step->stepping = 'A'; > + display_step->substepping = '2'; > + break; > + case STEP_B0: > + display_step->stepping = 'B'; > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > + break; > + case STEP_B1: > + display_step->stepping = 'B'; > + display_step->substepping = '1'; > + break; > + case STEP_B2: > + display_step->stepping = 'B'; > + display_step->substepping = '2'; > + break; > + case STEP_C0: > + display_step->stepping = 'C'; > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > + break; > + case STEP_C1: > + display_step->stepping = 'C'; > + display_step->substepping = '1'; > + break; > + case STEP_D0: > + display_step->stepping = 'D'; > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > + break; > + case STEP_D1: > + display_step->stepping = 'D'; > + display_step->substepping = '1'; > + break; > + case STEP_E0: > + display_step->stepping = 'E'; > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > + break; > + case STEP_F0: > + display_step->stepping = 'F'; > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > + break; > + case STEP_G0: > + display_step->stepping = 'G'; > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > + break; > + case STEP_H0: > + display_step->stepping = 'H'; > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > + break; > + case STEP_I0: > + display_step->stepping = 'I'; > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > + break; > + case STEP_J0: > + display_step->stepping = 'J'; > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > + break; > + case STEP_K0: > + display_step->stepping = 'K'; > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > + break; > + default: > + display_step->stepping = '*'; > + display_step->substepping = '*'; > + break; > } > - > - if (INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < size) > - return si + INTEL_REVID(dev_priv); > - > - return &no_stepping_info; > + return display_step; > } > > static void gen9_set_dc_state_debugmask(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c > index ba9479a67521..c8542161c5d0 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c > @@ -15,6 +15,38 @@ > > > /* FIXME: what about REVID_E0 */ So that comment was next to kbl_revids, and this makes it meaningless. > +static const struct intel_step_info bxt_revid_step_tbl[] = { Please just call them "bxt_revids" or "bxt_steps" or something simple. I meant to clean up all the other names too, they're a bit excessive. > + [0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 }, > + [1] = { .gt_step = STEP_A1, .display_step = STEP_A1 }, > + [2] = { .gt_step = STEP_A2, .display_step = STEP_A2 }, > + [6] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_B0 }, > + [7] = { .gt_step = STEP_B1, .display_step = STEP_B1 }, > + [8] = { .gt_step = STEP_B2, .display_step = STEP_B2 }, > +}; We might want to add something like this: @@ -112,5 +112,8 @@ void intel_step_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915) if (drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, step.gt_step == STEP_NONE)) return; + if (step.display_step == STEP_NONE) + step.display_step = step.gt_step; + RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->step = step; } So that we could just initialize .gt_step when the .display_step matches the .gt_step, and we could avoid the repetition. This wasn't useful for the platforms currently added, because they actually have the differences. This can also be left for future cleanup. > + > + Superfluous newline. > +static const struct intel_step_info skl_revid_step_tbl[] = { > + [0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 }, > + [1] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_B0 }, > + [2] = { .gt_step = STEP_C0, .display_step = STEP_C0 }, > + [3] = { .gt_step = STEP_D0, .display_step = STEP_D0 }, > + [4] = { .gt_step = STEP_E0, .display_step = STEP_E0 }, > + [5] = { .gt_step = STEP_F0, .display_step = STEP_F0 }, > + [6] = { .gt_step = STEP_G0, .display_step = STEP_G0 }, > + [7] = { .gt_step = STEP_H0, .display_step = STEP_H0 }, > + [8] = { .gt_step = STEP_I0, .display_step = STEP_I0 }, > + [9] = { .gt_step = STEP_J0, .display_step = STEP_J0 }, skl_stepping_info in intel_dmc.c has K0, this one doesn't. > +}; > + > +static const struct intel_step_info icl_revid_step_tbl[] = { > + [0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 }, > + [3] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_B0 }, > + [4] = { .gt_step = STEP_B2, .display_step = STEP_B2 }, > + [5] = { .gt_step = STEP_C0, .display_step = STEP_C0 }, > + [6] = { .gt_step = STEP_C1, .display_step = STEP_C1 }, > + [7] = { .gt_step = STEP_D0, .display_step = STEP_D0 }, icl_stepping_info in intel_dmc.c has A1 and A2, this one doesn't. This one has C1 and D0, the one in intel_dmc.c doesn't. > +}; > + > static const struct intel_step_info kbl_revids[] = { > [0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 }, > [1] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_B0 }, > @@ -76,6 +108,15 @@ void intel_step_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > } else if (IS_KABYLAKE(i915)) { > revids = kbl_revids; > size = ARRAY_SIZE(kbl_revids); > + } else if (IS_ICELAKE(i915)) { > + revids = icl_revid_step_tbl; > + size = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_revid_step_tbl); > + } else if (IS_SKYLAKE(i915)) { > + revids = skl_revid_step_tbl; > + size = ARRAY_SIZE(skl_revid_step_tbl); > + } else if (IS_BROXTON(i915)) { > + revids = bxt_revid_step_tbl; > + size = ARRAY_SIZE(bxt_revid_step_tbl); Doing this should be accompanied by: * Removing *all* ICL_REVID_*, SKL_REVID_* and BXT_REVID_* macros from i915_drv.h. * Converting IS_ICL_REVID(), IS_SKL_REVID(), and IS_BXT_REVID() to IS_{ICL,SKL,KBL}_{GT,DISPLAY}_STEP(). * And making their references use the generic STEP_* macros. These changes should probably be done on a platform by platform basis, just in case we hit any issues. This needs to be trivial to bisect and backtrack as needed. We currently have two schemes just for transition; we do not want to have two schemes for a single platform effective at the same time. BR, Jani. > } > > /* Not using the stepping scheme for the platform yet. */ > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h > index 958a8bb5d677..1bffa41f2660 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h > @@ -22,15 +22,22 @@ struct intel_step_info { > enum intel_step { > STEP_NONE = 0, > STEP_A0, > + STEP_A1, > STEP_A2, > STEP_B0, > STEP_B1, > + STEP_B2, > STEP_C0, > + STEP_C1, > STEP_D0, > STEP_D1, > STEP_E0, > STEP_F0, > STEP_G0, > + STEP_H0, > + STEP_I0, > + STEP_J0, > + STEP_K0, > STEP_FUTURE, > STEP_FOREVER, > };
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> > Sent: Monday, July 5, 2021 3:01 AM > To: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>; intel- > gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: De Marchi, Lucas <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO- > >step for DMC > > On Thu, 01 Jul 2021, Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> wrote: > > On the dmc side,we maintain a lookup table with different display > > stepping-substepping combinations. > > > > Instead of adding new table for every new platform, lets ues the > > stepping info from RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->step > > > > v2: Add stepping table for older platforms in intel_step.c (Lucas) > > > > Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 117 > > +++++++++++++++-------- > > The changes here... > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c | 41 ++++++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h | 7 ++ > > ...should be separate from, and depend on, the changes here. Please don't > try to do too much in one patch. Smaller is better. > > > 3 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c > > index f8789d4543bf..df888a3d086e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c > > @@ -247,50 +247,89 @@ bool intel_dmc_has_payload(struct > drm_i915_private *i915) > > return i915->dmc.dmc_info[DMC_FW_MAIN].payload; > > } > > > > -static const struct stepping_info skl_stepping_info[] = { > > - {'A', '0'}, {'B', '0'}, {'C', '0'}, > > - {'D', '0'}, {'E', '0'}, {'F', '0'}, > > - {'G', '0'}, {'H', '0'}, {'I', '0'}, > > - {'J', '0'}, {'K', '0'} > > -}; > > - > > -static const struct stepping_info bxt_stepping_info[] = { > > - {'A', '0'}, {'A', '1'}, {'A', '2'}, > > - {'B', '0'}, {'B', '1'}, {'B', '2'} > > -}; > > - > > -static const struct stepping_info icl_stepping_info[] = { > > - {'A', '0'}, {'A', '1'}, {'A', '2'}, > > - {'B', '0'}, {'B', '2'}, > > - {'C', '0'} > > -}; > > - > > static const struct stepping_info no_stepping_info = { '*', '*' }; > > +struct stepping_info *display_step; > > > > -static const struct stepping_info * > > +static struct stepping_info * > > intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { > > - const struct stepping_info *si; > > - unsigned int size; > > - > > - if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) { > > - size = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_stepping_info); > > - si = icl_stepping_info; > > - } else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) { > > - size = ARRAY_SIZE(skl_stepping_info); > > - si = skl_stepping_info; > > - } else if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) { > > - size = ARRAY_SIZE(bxt_stepping_info); > > - si = bxt_stepping_info; > > - } else { > > - size = 0; > > - si = NULL; > > + struct intel_step_info step = RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->step; > > + > > + switch (step.display_step) { > > + case STEP_A0: > > + display_step->stepping = 'A'; > > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > > + break; > > + case STEP_A1: > > + display_step->stepping = 'A'; > > + display_step->substepping = '1'; > > + break; > > + case STEP_A2: > > + display_step->stepping = 'A'; > > + display_step->substepping = '2'; > > + break; > > + case STEP_B0: > > + display_step->stepping = 'B'; > > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > > + break; > > + case STEP_B1: > > + display_step->stepping = 'B'; > > + display_step->substepping = '1'; > > + break; > > + case STEP_B2: > > + display_step->stepping = 'B'; > > + display_step->substepping = '2'; > > + break; > > + case STEP_C0: > > + display_step->stepping = 'C'; > > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > > + break; > > + case STEP_C1: > > + display_step->stepping = 'C'; > > + display_step->substepping = '1'; > > + break; > > + case STEP_D0: > > + display_step->stepping = 'D'; > > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > > + break; > > + case STEP_D1: > > + display_step->stepping = 'D'; > > + display_step->substepping = '1'; > > + break; > > + case STEP_E0: > > + display_step->stepping = 'E'; > > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > > + break; > > + case STEP_F0: > > + display_step->stepping = 'F'; > > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > > + break; > > + case STEP_G0: > > + display_step->stepping = 'G'; > > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > > + break; > > + case STEP_H0: > > + display_step->stepping = 'H'; > > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > > + break; > > + case STEP_I0: > > + display_step->stepping = 'I'; > > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > > + break; > > + case STEP_J0: > > + display_step->stepping = 'J'; > > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > > + break; > > + case STEP_K0: > > + display_step->stepping = 'K'; > > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > > + break; > > + default: > > + display_step->stepping = '*'; > > + display_step->substepping = '*'; > > + break; > > } > > - > > - if (INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < size) > > - return si + INTEL_REVID(dev_priv); > > - > > - return &no_stepping_info; > > + return display_step; > > } > > > > static void gen9_set_dc_state_debugmask(struct drm_i915_private > > *dev_priv) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c > > index ba9479a67521..c8542161c5d0 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c > > @@ -15,6 +15,38 @@ > > > > > > /* FIXME: what about REVID_E0 */ > > So that comment was next to kbl_revids, and this makes it meaningless. > > > +static const struct intel_step_info bxt_revid_step_tbl[] = { > > Please just call them "bxt_revids" or "bxt_steps" or something simple. I > meant to clean up all the other names too, they're a bit excessive. > I ll send the patch to change the names. > > + [0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 }, > > + [1] = { .gt_step = STEP_A1, .display_step = STEP_A1 }, > > + [2] = { .gt_step = STEP_A2, .display_step = STEP_A2 }, > > + [6] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_B0 }, > > + [7] = { .gt_step = STEP_B1, .display_step = STEP_B1 }, > > + [8] = { .gt_step = STEP_B2, .display_step = STEP_B2 }, }; > > We might want to add something like this: > > @@ -112,5 +112,8 @@ void intel_step_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > if (drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, step.gt_step == STEP_NONE)) > return; > > + if (step.display_step == STEP_NONE) > + step.display_step = step.gt_step; > + > RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->step = step; > } > > So that we could just initialize .gt_step when the .display_step matches the > .gt_step, and we could avoid the repetition. This wasn't useful for the > platforms currently added, because they actually have the differences. > > This can also be left for future cleanup. Makes sense. I ll be changing this now. Thanks for feedback. > > + > > + > > Superfluous newline. > > > +static const struct intel_step_info skl_revid_step_tbl[] = { > > + [0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 }, > > + [1] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_B0 }, > > + [2] = { .gt_step = STEP_C0, .display_step = STEP_C0 }, > > + [3] = { .gt_step = STEP_D0, .display_step = STEP_D0 }, > > + [4] = { .gt_step = STEP_E0, .display_step = STEP_E0 }, > > + [5] = { .gt_step = STEP_F0, .display_step = STEP_F0 }, > > + [6] = { .gt_step = STEP_G0, .display_step = STEP_G0 }, > > + [7] = { .gt_step = STEP_H0, .display_step = STEP_H0 }, > > + [8] = { .gt_step = STEP_I0, .display_step = STEP_I0 }, > > + [9] = { .gt_step = STEP_J0, .display_step = STEP_J0 }, > > skl_stepping_info in intel_dmc.c has K0, this one doesn't. > > > +}; > > + > > +static const struct intel_step_info icl_revid_step_tbl[] = { > > + [0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 }, > > + [3] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_B0 }, > > + [4] = { .gt_step = STEP_B2, .display_step = STEP_B2 }, > > + [5] = { .gt_step = STEP_C0, .display_step = STEP_C0 }, > > + [6] = { .gt_step = STEP_C1, .display_step = STEP_C1 }, > > + [7] = { .gt_step = STEP_D0, .display_step = STEP_D0 }, > > icl_stepping_info in intel_dmc.c has A1 and A2, this one doesn't. This one has > C1 and D0, the one in intel_dmc.c doesn't. > > > +}; > > + > > static const struct intel_step_info kbl_revids[] = { > > [0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 }, > > [1] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_B0 }, @@ -76,6 > > +108,15 @@ void intel_step_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > } else if (IS_KABYLAKE(i915)) { > > revids = kbl_revids; > > size = ARRAY_SIZE(kbl_revids); > > + } else if (IS_ICELAKE(i915)) { > > + revids = icl_revid_step_tbl; > > + size = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_revid_step_tbl); > > + } else if (IS_SKYLAKE(i915)) { > > + revids = skl_revid_step_tbl; > > + size = ARRAY_SIZE(skl_revid_step_tbl); > > + } else if (IS_BROXTON(i915)) { > > + revids = bxt_revid_step_tbl; > > + size = ARRAY_SIZE(bxt_revid_step_tbl); > > Doing this should be accompanied by: > > * Removing *all* ICL_REVID_*, SKL_REVID_* and BXT_REVID_* macros from > i915_drv.h. > > * Converting IS_ICL_REVID(), IS_SKL_REVID(), and IS_BXT_REVID() to > IS_{ICL,SKL,KBL}_{GT,DISPLAY}_STEP(). > > * And making their references use the generic STEP_* macros. > > These changes should probably be done on a platform by platform basis, just > in case we hit any issues. This needs to be trivial to bisect and backtrack as > needed. > > We currently have two schemes just for transition; we do not want to have > two schemes for a single platform effective at the same time. > Thanks for feedback. Taking care of these changes. Anusha > BR, > Jani. > > > } > > > > /* Not using the stepping scheme for the platform yet. */ diff --git > > a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h > > index 958a8bb5d677..1bffa41f2660 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h > > @@ -22,15 +22,22 @@ struct intel_step_info { enum intel_step { > > STEP_NONE = 0, > > STEP_A0, > > + STEP_A1, > > STEP_A2, > > STEP_B0, > > STEP_B1, > > + STEP_B2, > > STEP_C0, > > + STEP_C1, > > STEP_D0, > > STEP_D1, > > STEP_E0, > > STEP_F0, > > STEP_G0, > > + STEP_H0, > > + STEP_I0, > > + STEP_J0, > > + STEP_K0, > > STEP_FUTURE, > > STEP_FOREVER, > > }; > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c index f8789d4543bf..df888a3d086e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c @@ -247,50 +247,89 @@ bool intel_dmc_has_payload(struct drm_i915_private *i915) return i915->dmc.dmc_info[DMC_FW_MAIN].payload; } -static const struct stepping_info skl_stepping_info[] = { - {'A', '0'}, {'B', '0'}, {'C', '0'}, - {'D', '0'}, {'E', '0'}, {'F', '0'}, - {'G', '0'}, {'H', '0'}, {'I', '0'}, - {'J', '0'}, {'K', '0'} -}; - -static const struct stepping_info bxt_stepping_info[] = { - {'A', '0'}, {'A', '1'}, {'A', '2'}, - {'B', '0'}, {'B', '1'}, {'B', '2'} -}; - -static const struct stepping_info icl_stepping_info[] = { - {'A', '0'}, {'A', '1'}, {'A', '2'}, - {'B', '0'}, {'B', '2'}, - {'C', '0'} -}; - static const struct stepping_info no_stepping_info = { '*', '*' }; +struct stepping_info *display_step; -static const struct stepping_info * +static struct stepping_info * intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { - const struct stepping_info *si; - unsigned int size; - - if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) { - size = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_stepping_info); - si = icl_stepping_info; - } else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) { - size = ARRAY_SIZE(skl_stepping_info); - si = skl_stepping_info; - } else if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) { - size = ARRAY_SIZE(bxt_stepping_info); - si = bxt_stepping_info; - } else { - size = 0; - si = NULL; + struct intel_step_info step = RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->step; + + switch (step.display_step) { + case STEP_A0: + display_step->stepping = 'A'; + display_step->substepping = '0'; + break; + case STEP_A1: + display_step->stepping = 'A'; + display_step->substepping = '1'; + break; + case STEP_A2: + display_step->stepping = 'A'; + display_step->substepping = '2'; + break; + case STEP_B0: + display_step->stepping = 'B'; + display_step->substepping = '0'; + break; + case STEP_B1: + display_step->stepping = 'B'; + display_step->substepping = '1'; + break; + case STEP_B2: + display_step->stepping = 'B'; + display_step->substepping = '2'; + break; + case STEP_C0: + display_step->stepping = 'C'; + display_step->substepping = '0'; + break; + case STEP_C1: + display_step->stepping = 'C'; + display_step->substepping = '1'; + break; + case STEP_D0: + display_step->stepping = 'D'; + display_step->substepping = '0'; + break; + case STEP_D1: + display_step->stepping = 'D'; + display_step->substepping = '1'; + break; + case STEP_E0: + display_step->stepping = 'E'; + display_step->substepping = '0'; + break; + case STEP_F0: + display_step->stepping = 'F'; + display_step->substepping = '0'; + break; + case STEP_G0: + display_step->stepping = 'G'; + display_step->substepping = '0'; + break; + case STEP_H0: + display_step->stepping = 'H'; + display_step->substepping = '0'; + break; + case STEP_I0: + display_step->stepping = 'I'; + display_step->substepping = '0'; + break; + case STEP_J0: + display_step->stepping = 'J'; + display_step->substepping = '0'; + break; + case STEP_K0: + display_step->stepping = 'K'; + display_step->substepping = '0'; + break; + default: + display_step->stepping = '*'; + display_step->substepping = '*'; + break; } - - if (INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < size) - return si + INTEL_REVID(dev_priv); - - return &no_stepping_info; + return display_step; } static void gen9_set_dc_state_debugmask(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c index ba9479a67521..c8542161c5d0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c @@ -15,6 +15,38 @@ /* FIXME: what about REVID_E0 */ +static const struct intel_step_info bxt_revid_step_tbl[] = { + [0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 }, + [1] = { .gt_step = STEP_A1, .display_step = STEP_A1 }, + [2] = { .gt_step = STEP_A2, .display_step = STEP_A2 }, + [6] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_B0 }, + [7] = { .gt_step = STEP_B1, .display_step = STEP_B1 }, + [8] = { .gt_step = STEP_B2, .display_step = STEP_B2 }, +}; + + +static const struct intel_step_info skl_revid_step_tbl[] = { + [0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 }, + [1] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_B0 }, + [2] = { .gt_step = STEP_C0, .display_step = STEP_C0 }, + [3] = { .gt_step = STEP_D0, .display_step = STEP_D0 }, + [4] = { .gt_step = STEP_E0, .display_step = STEP_E0 }, + [5] = { .gt_step = STEP_F0, .display_step = STEP_F0 }, + [6] = { .gt_step = STEP_G0, .display_step = STEP_G0 }, + [7] = { .gt_step = STEP_H0, .display_step = STEP_H0 }, + [8] = { .gt_step = STEP_I0, .display_step = STEP_I0 }, + [9] = { .gt_step = STEP_J0, .display_step = STEP_J0 }, +}; + +static const struct intel_step_info icl_revid_step_tbl[] = { + [0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 }, + [3] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_B0 }, + [4] = { .gt_step = STEP_B2, .display_step = STEP_B2 }, + [5] = { .gt_step = STEP_C0, .display_step = STEP_C0 }, + [6] = { .gt_step = STEP_C1, .display_step = STEP_C1 }, + [7] = { .gt_step = STEP_D0, .display_step = STEP_D0 }, +}; + static const struct intel_step_info kbl_revids[] = { [0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 }, [1] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_B0 }, @@ -76,6 +108,15 @@ void intel_step_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915) } else if (IS_KABYLAKE(i915)) { revids = kbl_revids; size = ARRAY_SIZE(kbl_revids); + } else if (IS_ICELAKE(i915)) { + revids = icl_revid_step_tbl; + size = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_revid_step_tbl); + } else if (IS_SKYLAKE(i915)) { + revids = skl_revid_step_tbl; + size = ARRAY_SIZE(skl_revid_step_tbl); + } else if (IS_BROXTON(i915)) { + revids = bxt_revid_step_tbl; + size = ARRAY_SIZE(bxt_revid_step_tbl); } /* Not using the stepping scheme for the platform yet. */ diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h index 958a8bb5d677..1bffa41f2660 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h @@ -22,15 +22,22 @@ struct intel_step_info { enum intel_step { STEP_NONE = 0, STEP_A0, + STEP_A1, STEP_A2, STEP_B0, STEP_B1, + STEP_B2, STEP_C0, + STEP_C1, STEP_D0, STEP_D1, STEP_E0, STEP_F0, STEP_G0, + STEP_H0, + STEP_I0, + STEP_J0, + STEP_K0, STEP_FUTURE, STEP_FOREVER, };
On the dmc side,we maintain a lookup table with different display stepping-substepping combinations. Instead of adding new table for every new platform, lets ues the stepping info from RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->step v2: Add stepping table for older platforms in intel_step.c (Lucas) Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 117 +++++++++++++++-------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c | 41 ++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h | 7 ++ 3 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)