diff mbox series

[v3] drm/i915/display: Drop redundant debug print

Message ID 20210812131107.5531-1-swati2.sharma@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v3] drm/i915/display: Drop redundant debug print | expand

Commit Message

Sharma, Swati2 Aug. 12, 2021, 1:11 p.m. UTC
drm_dp_dpcd_read/write already has debug error message.
Drop redundant error messages which gives false
status even if correct value is read in drm_dp_dpcd_read().

v2: -Added fixes tag (Ankit)
v3: -Fixed build error (CI)

Fixes: 9488a030ac91 ("drm/i915: Add support for enabling link status and recovery")
Cc: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> (v2)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: "Ville Syrj_l_" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: "Jos_ Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.12+

Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201218103723.30844-12-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com

Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 9 ++-------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Imre Deak Aug. 12, 2021, 4:01 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 06:41:07PM +0530, Swati Sharma wrote:
> drm_dp_dpcd_read/write already has debug error message.
> Drop redundant error messages which gives false
> status even if correct value is read in drm_dp_dpcd_read().
> 
> v2: -Added fixes tag (Ankit)
> v3: -Fixed build error (CI)
> 
> Fixes: 9488a030ac91 ("drm/i915: Add support for enabling link status and recovery")
> Cc: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
> Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> (v2)
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Cc: "Ville Syrj_l_" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
> Cc: "Jos_ Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
> Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.12+
> 
> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201218103723.30844-12-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
> 
> Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 9 ++-------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index c386ef8eb200..2526c9c8c690 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -3864,23 +3864,18 @@ static void intel_dp_check_device_service_irq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  
>  static void intel_dp_check_link_service_irq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
> -	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>  	u8 val;
>  
>  	if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < 0x11)
>  		return;
>  
>  	if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux,
> -			      DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, &val) != 1 || !val) {
> -		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Error in reading link service irq vector\n");

The only problem seems to be that for !val the debug print is incorrect,
so maybe just have a separate check for that after this one for the read()
and return w/o the debug message?

Is it really a stable material, since the change wouldn't have any
effect for regular users?

> +			      DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, &val) != 1 || !val)
>  		return;
> -	}
>  
>  	if (drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux,
> -			       DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, val) != 1) {
> -		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Error in writing link service irq vector\n");
> +			       DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, val) != 1)
>  		return;
> -	}
>  
>  	if (val & HDMI_LINK_STATUS_CHANGED)
>  		intel_dp_handle_hdmi_link_status_change(intel_dp);
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>
Sharma, Swati2 Aug. 16, 2021, 11:53 a.m. UTC | #2
On 12-Aug-21 9:31 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 06:41:07PM +0530, Swati Sharma wrote:
>> drm_dp_dpcd_read/write already has debug error message.
>> Drop redundant error messages which gives false
>> status even if correct value is read in drm_dp_dpcd_read().
>>
>> v2: -Added fixes tag (Ankit)
>> v3: -Fixed build error (CI)
>>
>> Fixes: 9488a030ac91 ("drm/i915: Add support for enabling link status and recovery")
>> Cc: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
>> Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>> Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> (v2)
>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> Cc: "Ville Syrj_l_" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
>> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
>> Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>> Cc: "Jos_ Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
>> Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.12+
>>
>> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201218103723.30844-12-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 9 ++-------
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> index c386ef8eb200..2526c9c8c690 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -3864,23 +3864,18 @@ static void intel_dp_check_device_service_irq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>   
>>   static void intel_dp_check_link_service_irq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>   {
>> -	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>>   	u8 val;
>>   
>>   	if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < 0x11)
>>   		return;
>>   
>>   	if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux,
>> -			      DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, &val) != 1 || !val) {
>> -		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Error in reading link service irq vector\n");
> 
> The only problem seems to be that for !val the debug print is incorrect,
> so maybe just have a separate check for that after this one for the read()
> and return w/o the debug message?
> 
> Is it really a stable material, since the change wouldn't have any
> effect for regular users?
> 

W/o this change in case of valid short pulse this error message will 
come even if
it doesn't have anything to do with link service irq. For ex: in case of 
hdcp we keep getting unnecessary error message because the value read is 
0 which will always be the case unless its really a link failure between 
PCON and HDMI2.1 sink.

Also, code is written in accordance with other IRQ func() above like 
intel_dp_check_device_service_irq().

>> +			      DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, &val) != 1 || !val)
>>   		return;
>> -	}
>>   
>>   	if (drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux,
>> -			       DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, val) != 1) {
>> -		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Error in writing link service irq vector\n");
>> +			       DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, val) != 1)
>>   		return;
>> -	}
>>   
>>   	if (val & HDMI_LINK_STATUS_CHANGED)
>>   		intel_dp_handle_hdmi_link_status_change(intel_dp);
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>>
Imre Deak Aug. 16, 2021, 12:01 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 05:23:00PM +0530, Sharma, Swati2 wrote:
> On 12-Aug-21 9:31 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 06:41:07PM +0530, Swati Sharma wrote:
> > > drm_dp_dpcd_read/write already has debug error message.
> > > Drop redundant error messages which gives false
> > > status even if correct value is read in drm_dp_dpcd_read().
> > > 
> > > v2: -Added fixes tag (Ankit)
> > > v3: -Fixed build error (CI)
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 9488a030ac91 ("drm/i915: Add support for enabling link status and recovery")
> > > Cc: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> (v2)
> > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> > > Cc: "Ville Syrj_l_" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
> > > Cc: "Jos_ Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
> > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.12+
> > > 
> > > Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201218103723.30844-12-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 9 ++-------
> > >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > index c386ef8eb200..2526c9c8c690 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > @@ -3864,23 +3864,18 @@ static void intel_dp_check_device_service_irq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > >   static void intel_dp_check_link_service_irq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > >   {
> > > -	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > >   	u8 val;
> > >   	if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < 0x11)
> > >   		return;
> > >   	if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux,
> > > -			      DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, &val) != 1 || !val) {
> > > -		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Error in reading link service irq vector\n");
> > 
> > The only problem seems to be that for !val the debug print is incorrect,
> > so maybe just have a separate check for that after this one for the read()
> > and return w/o the debug message?
> > 
> > Is it really a stable material, since the change wouldn't have any
> > effect for regular users?
> 
> W/o this change in case of valid short pulse this error message will
> come even if it doesn't have anything to do with link service irq. For
> ex: in case of hdcp we keep getting unnecessary error message because
> the value read is 0 which will always be the case unless its really a
> link failure between PCON and HDMI2.1 sink.

Yes, that's why I suggested to return for the '0 value read' case
without any message printed, but still keep the message for the case
when the drm_dp_dpcd_readb() fails.

Note that it's not an error message but a debug message.

> Also, code is written in accordance with other IRQ func() above like
> intel_dp_check_device_service_irq().

Ok, it's good to keep them in sync at least, so I'm ok with removing the
debug messages from here too.

> > > +			      DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, &val) != 1 || !val)
> > >   		return;
> > > -	}
> > >   	if (drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux,
> > > -			       DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, val) != 1) {
> > > -		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Error in writing link service irq vector\n");
> > > +			       DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, val) != 1)
> > >   		return;
> > > -	}
> > >   	if (val & HDMI_LINK_STATUS_CHANGED)
> > >   		intel_dp_handle_hdmi_link_status_change(intel_dp);
> > > -- 
> > > 2.25.1
> > > 
> 
> -- 
> ~Swati Sharma
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index c386ef8eb200..2526c9c8c690 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -3864,23 +3864,18 @@  static void intel_dp_check_device_service_irq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 
 static void intel_dp_check_link_service_irq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 {
-	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
 	u8 val;
 
 	if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < 0x11)
 		return;
 
 	if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux,
-			      DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, &val) != 1 || !val) {
-		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Error in reading link service irq vector\n");
+			      DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, &val) != 1 || !val)
 		return;
-	}
 
 	if (drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux,
-			       DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, val) != 1) {
-		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Error in writing link service irq vector\n");
+			       DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, val) != 1)
 		return;
-	}
 
 	if (val & HDMI_LINK_STATUS_CHANGED)
 		intel_dp_handle_hdmi_link_status_change(intel_dp);