From patchwork Thu Sep 9 16:47:40 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Matthew Brost X-Patchwork-Id: 12483537 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9EAFC433EF for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 16:54:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B1F861104 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 16:54:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 7B1F861104 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D5C6E8FF; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 16:53:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9A816E8D8; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 16:52:54 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10102"; a="218988866" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,280,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="218988866" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Sep 2021 09:52:54 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,280,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="649003851" Received: from jons-linux-dev-box.fm.intel.com ([10.1.27.20]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Sep 2021 09:52:54 -0700 From: Matthew Brost To: , Cc: , Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 09:47:40 -0700 Message-Id: <20210909164744.31249-20-matthew.brost@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 In-Reply-To: <20210909164744.31249-1-matthew.brost@intel.com> References: <20210909164744.31249-1-matthew.brost@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/23] drm/i915/guc: Drop pin count check trick between sched_disable and re-pin X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" Drop pin count check trick between a sched_disable and re-pin, now rely on the lock and counter of the number of committed requests to determine if scheduling should be disabled on the context. Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h | 2 + .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 53 +++++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h index d2f798ef678c..3a5d98e908f4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h @@ -169,6 +169,8 @@ struct intel_context { struct list_head fences; /* GuC context blocked fence */ struct i915_sw_fence blocked; + /* GuC committed requests */ + int number_committed_requests; } guc_state; struct { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c index 4814acf1c2ac..31f911ae14fa 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c @@ -249,6 +249,25 @@ static inline void decr_context_blocked(struct intel_context *ce) ce->guc_state.sched_state -= SCHED_STATE_BLOCKED; } +static inline bool context_has_committed_requests(struct intel_context *ce) +{ + return !!ce->guc_state.number_committed_requests; +} + +static inline void incr_context_committed_requests(struct intel_context *ce) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_state.lock); + ++ce->guc_state.number_committed_requests; + GEM_BUG_ON(ce->guc_state.number_committed_requests < 0); +} + +static inline void decr_context_committed_requests(struct intel_context *ce) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_state.lock); + --ce->guc_state.number_committed_requests; + GEM_BUG_ON(ce->guc_state.number_committed_requests < 0); +} + static inline bool context_guc_id_invalid(struct intel_context *ce) { return ce->guc_id == GUC_INVALID_LRC_ID; @@ -1766,24 +1785,18 @@ static void guc_context_sched_disable(struct intel_context *ce) spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags); /* - * We have to check if the context has been disabled by another thread. - * We also have to check if the context has been pinned again as another - * pin operation is allowed to pass this function. Checking the pin - * count, within ce->guc_state.lock, synchronizes this function with - * guc_request_alloc ensuring a request doesn't slip through the - * 'context_pending_disable' fence. Checking within the spin lock (can't - * sleep) ensures another process doesn't pin this context and generate - * a request before we set the 'context_pending_disable' flag here. + * We have to check if the context has been disabled by another thread, + * check if submssion has been disabled to seal a race with reset and + * finally check if any more requests have been committed to the + * context ensursing that a request doesn't slip through the + * 'context_pending_disable' fence. */ - if (unlikely(!context_enabled(ce) || submission_disabled(guc))) { + if (unlikely(!context_enabled(ce) || submission_disabled(guc) || + context_has_committed_requests(ce))) { clr_context_enabled(ce); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags); goto unpin; } - if (unlikely(atomic_add_unless(&ce->pin_count, -2, 2))) { - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags); - return; - } guc_id = prep_context_pending_disable(ce); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags); @@ -1813,6 +1826,7 @@ static void __guc_context_destroy(struct intel_context *ce) ce->guc_prio_count[GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_HIGH] || ce->guc_prio_count[GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_KMD_NORMAL] || ce->guc_prio_count[GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_NORMAL]); + GEM_BUG_ON(ce->guc_state.number_committed_requests); lrc_fini(ce); intel_context_fini(ce); @@ -2043,6 +2057,10 @@ static void remove_from_context(struct i915_request *rq) spin_unlock_irq(&ce->guc_active.lock); + spin_lock_irq(&ce->guc_state.lock); + decr_context_committed_requests(ce); + spin_unlock_irq(&ce->guc_state.lock); + atomic_dec(&ce->guc_id_ref); i915_request_notify_execute_cb_imm(rq); } @@ -2193,15 +2211,7 @@ static int guc_request_alloc(struct i915_request *rq) * schedule enable or context registration if either G2H is pending * respectfully. Once a G2H returns, the fence is released that is * blocking these requests (see guc_signal_context_fence). - * - * We can safely check the below fields outside of the lock as it isn't - * possible for these fields to transition from being clear to set but - * converse is possible, hence the need for the check within the lock. */ - if (likely(!context_wait_for_deregister_to_register(ce) && - !context_pending_disable(ce))) - return 0; - spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags); if (context_wait_for_deregister_to_register(ce) || context_pending_disable(ce)) { @@ -2210,6 +2220,7 @@ static int guc_request_alloc(struct i915_request *rq) list_add_tail(&rq->guc_fence_link, &ce->guc_state.fences); } + incr_context_committed_requests(ce); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags); return 0;