Message ID | 20220208194324.85333-6-namhyung@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | locking: Separate lock tracepoints from lockdep/lock_stat (v1.1) | expand |
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.c index dfd87d082218..6e4b8d036283 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.c @@ -106,8 +106,11 @@ void __intel_wakeref_init(struct intel_wakeref *wf, wf->wakeref = 0; INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&wf->work, __intel_wakeref_put_work); + +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP lockdep_init_map(&wf->work.work.lockdep_map, "wakeref.work", &key->work, 0); +#endif } int intel_wakeref_wait_for_idle(struct intel_wakeref *wf)
With upcoming lock tracepoints config, it'd define some of lockdep functions without enabling CONFIG_LOCKDEP actually. The existing code assumes those functions will be removed by the preprocessor but it's not the case anymore. Let's protect the code with #ifdef's explicitly. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)