diff mbox series

[PATCHv3] drm/i915/display: add support for dual panel backlight

Message ID 20220803100936.2955769-1-arun.r.murthy@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [PATCHv3] drm/i915/display: add support for dual panel backlight | expand

Commit Message

Murthy, Arun R Aug. 3, 2022, 10:09 a.m. UTC
The patch with commit 20f85ef89d94 ("drm/i915/backlight: use unique
backlight device names") already adds support for dual panel backlight
but with error prints. Since the patch tried to create the backlight
device with the same name and upon failure will try with a different
name it leads to failure logs in dmesg inturn getting caught by CI.

This patch alternately will check if the backlight class of same name
exists, will use a different name.

v2: reworked on top of the patch commit 20f85ef89d94
("drm/i915/backlight: use unique backlight device names")
v3: fixed the ref count leak(Jani N)

Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
---
 .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c    | 27 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Comments

Jani Nikula Aug. 3, 2022, 1:33 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 03 Aug 2022, Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> wrote:
> The patch with commit 20f85ef89d94 ("drm/i915/backlight: use unique
> backlight device names") already adds support for dual panel backlight
> but with error prints. Since the patch tried to create the backlight
> device with the same name and upon failure will try with a different
> name it leads to failure logs in dmesg inturn getting caught by CI.
>
> This patch alternately will check if the backlight class of same name
> exists, will use a different name.
>
> v2: reworked on top of the patch commit 20f85ef89d94
> ("drm/i915/backlight: use unique backlight device names")
> v3: fixed the ref count leak(Jani N)
>
> Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
> ---
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c    | 27 +++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c
> index 110fc98ec280..0f93b2ba907b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c
> @@ -971,26 +971,25 @@ int intel_backlight_device_register(struct intel_connector *connector)
>  	if (!name)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	bd = backlight_device_register(name, connector->base.kdev, connector,
> -				       &intel_backlight_device_ops, &props);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Using the same name independent of the drm device or connector
> -	 * prevents registration of multiple backlight devices in the
> -	 * driver. However, we need to use the default name for backward
> -	 * compatibility. Use unique names for subsequent backlight devices as a
> -	 * fallback when the default name already exists.
> -	 */
> -	if (IS_ERR(bd) && PTR_ERR(bd) == -EEXIST) {
> +	bd = backlight_device_get_by_name(name);
> +	if (bd) {
> +		put_device(&bd->dev);
> +		/*
> +		 * Using the same name independent of the drm device or connector
> +		 * prevents registration of multiple backlight devices in the
> +		 * driver. However, we need to use the default name for backward
> +		 * compatibility. Use unique names for subsequent backlight devices as a
> +		 * fallback when the default name already exists.
> +		 */
> +		kfree(bd);

Okay, this is getting tedious.

Please think about why this kfree is wrong.

BR,
Jani.


>  		kfree(name);
>  		name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "card%d-%s-backlight",
>  				 i915->drm.primary->index, connector->base.name);
>  		if (!name)
>  			return -ENOMEM;
> -
> -		bd = backlight_device_register(name, connector->base.kdev, connector,
> -					       &intel_backlight_device_ops, &props);
>  	}
> +	bd = backlight_device_register(name, connector->base.kdev, connector,
> +				       &intel_backlight_device_ops, &props);
>  
>  	if (IS_ERR(bd)) {
>  		drm_err(&i915->drm,
Murthy, Arun R Aug. 8, 2022, 3:55 a.m. UTC | #2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 7:03 PM
> To: Murthy, Arun R <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>; intel-
> gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Murthy, Arun R <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] drm/i915/display: add support for dual panel
> backlight
> 
> On Wed, 03 Aug 2022, Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> wrote:
> > The patch with commit 20f85ef89d94 ("drm/i915/backlight: use unique
> > backlight device names") already adds support for dual panel backlight
> > but with error prints. Since the patch tried to create the backlight
> > device with the same name and upon failure will try with a different
> > name it leads to failure logs in dmesg inturn getting caught by CI.
> >
> > This patch alternately will check if the backlight class of same name
> > exists, will use a different name.
> >
> > v2: reworked on top of the patch commit 20f85ef89d94
> > ("drm/i915/backlight: use unique backlight device names")
> > v3: fixed the ref count leak(Jani N)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c    | 27 +++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c
> > index 110fc98ec280..0f93b2ba907b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c
> > @@ -971,26 +971,25 @@ int intel_backlight_device_register(struct
> intel_connector *connector)
> >  	if (!name)
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > -	bd = backlight_device_register(name, connector->base.kdev,
> connector,
> > -				       &intel_backlight_device_ops, &props);
> > -
> > -	/*
> > -	 * Using the same name independent of the drm device or connector
> > -	 * prevents registration of multiple backlight devices in the
> > -	 * driver. However, we need to use the default name for backward
> > -	 * compatibility. Use unique names for subsequent backlight devices
> as a
> > -	 * fallback when the default name already exists.
> > -	 */
> > -	if (IS_ERR(bd) && PTR_ERR(bd) == -EEXIST) {
> > +	bd = backlight_device_get_by_name(name);
> > +	if (bd) {
> > +		put_device(&bd->dev);
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Using the same name independent of the drm device or
> connector
> > +		 * prevents registration of multiple backlight devices in the
> > +		 * driver. However, we need to use the default name for
> backward
> > +		 * compatibility. Use unique names for subsequent backlight
> devices as a
> > +		 * fallback when the default name already exists.
> > +		 */
> > +		kfree(bd);
> 
> Okay, this is getting tedious.
> 
> Please think about why this kfree is wrong.
My bad, this will clear the existing backlight device pointer.  Removed!

Thanks and Regards,
Arun R Murthy
--------------------
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c
index 110fc98ec280..0f93b2ba907b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c
@@ -971,26 +971,25 @@  int intel_backlight_device_register(struct intel_connector *connector)
 	if (!name)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	bd = backlight_device_register(name, connector->base.kdev, connector,
-				       &intel_backlight_device_ops, &props);
-
-	/*
-	 * Using the same name independent of the drm device or connector
-	 * prevents registration of multiple backlight devices in the
-	 * driver. However, we need to use the default name for backward
-	 * compatibility. Use unique names for subsequent backlight devices as a
-	 * fallback when the default name already exists.
-	 */
-	if (IS_ERR(bd) && PTR_ERR(bd) == -EEXIST) {
+	bd = backlight_device_get_by_name(name);
+	if (bd) {
+		put_device(&bd->dev);
+		/*
+		 * Using the same name independent of the drm device or connector
+		 * prevents registration of multiple backlight devices in the
+		 * driver. However, we need to use the default name for backward
+		 * compatibility. Use unique names for subsequent backlight devices as a
+		 * fallback when the default name already exists.
+		 */
+		kfree(bd);
 		kfree(name);
 		name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "card%d-%s-backlight",
 				 i915->drm.primary->index, connector->base.name);
 		if (!name)
 			return -ENOMEM;
-
-		bd = backlight_device_register(name, connector->base.kdev, connector,
-					       &intel_backlight_device_ops, &props);
 	}
+	bd = backlight_device_register(name, connector->base.kdev, connector,
+				       &intel_backlight_device_ops, &props);
 
 	if (IS_ERR(bd)) {
 		drm_err(&i915->drm,