From patchwork Mon Aug 8 23:51:50 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Lyude Paul X-Patchwork-Id: 12939167 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E940C00140 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 23:55:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C669812B3C5; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 23:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6291612AF60 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 23:54:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1660002863; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ulBqU/UC4+G7ZCOp5gWa2ib+D+JCAcv6bqRwjOAxJYg=; b=hm4+4Td3jorp0EEz5EeJ77ngkUaSrhFnH5W1ik0F+SW745AY/mb02zNdHRAwlmXs405rXi Sb9JW2NQnOxlalGRTJtnQPzHRep087ZPe8ADKF5RuSCiCTIbjausKhE3c6jao8K0Je6aFj CeHPIsDtobBMr8UqgOUg97qS3nd/weY= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-112-9fZcChwKOECS_YGrkCJCVg-1; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 19:54:17 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 9fZcChwKOECS_YGrkCJCVg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E10D380390A; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 23:54:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from emerald.lyude.net (unknown [10.22.17.154]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051E1C15BA1; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 23:54:15 +0000 (UTC) From: Lyude Paul To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 19:51:50 -0400 Message-Id: <20220808235203.123892-6-lyude@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20220808235203.123892-1-lyude@redhat.com> References: <20220808235203.123892-1-lyude@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.8 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [RFC v2 05/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Fix confusing docs for drm_dp_atomic_release_time_slots() X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thomas Zimmermann , Jani Nikula , Daniel Vetter , open list , Bhawanpreet Lakha , David Airlie , Fangzhi Zuo , Daniel Vetter , Wayne Lin Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" For some reason we mention returning 0 if "slots have been added back to drm_dp_mst_topology_state->avail_slots". This is totally misleading, avail_slots is simply for figuring out the total number of slots available in total on the topology and has no relation to the current payload allocations. So, let's get rid of that comment. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul Cc: Wayne Lin Cc: Ville Syrjälä Cc: Fangzhi Zuo Cc: Jani Nikula Cc: Imre Deak Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Sean Paul Acked-by: Jani Nikula --- drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c index fad80ab2b9db..8a2ddfde594a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c @@ -4456,8 +4456,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots); * drm_dp_mst_atomic_check() * * Returns: - * 0 if all slots for this port were added back to - * &drm_dp_mst_topology_state.avail_slots or negative error code + * 0 on success, negative error code otherwise */ int drm_dp_atomic_release_time_slots(struct drm_atomic_state *state, struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,