Message ID | 20220811112802.4167768-1-tapas.rana@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Fixes KW issues for NULL pointer dereference | expand |
On 11.08.2022 13:28, Tapas Rana wrote: I guess even for trivial patches rules should be followed - subject should describe what has changed, commit message should describe why. > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c > index 9a7e50534b84..0bbf44c34cff 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c > @@ -435,6 +435,9 @@ i915_ttm_memcpy_work_arm(struct i915_ttm_memcpy_work *work, > static bool i915_ttm_memcpy_allowed(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, > struct ttm_resource *dst_mem) > { > + if(!bo) > + return NULL; I guess it should be "return false" Regards Andrzej > + > if (i915_gem_object_needs_ccs_pages(i915_ttm_to_gem(bo))) > return false; >
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c index 9a7e50534b84..0bbf44c34cff 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c @@ -435,6 +435,9 @@ i915_ttm_memcpy_work_arm(struct i915_ttm_memcpy_work *work, static bool i915_ttm_memcpy_allowed(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, struct ttm_resource *dst_mem) { + if(!bo) + return NULL; + if (i915_gem_object_needs_ccs_pages(i915_ttm_to_gem(bo))) return false;