diff mbox series

drm/i915/dg2: Drop force_probe requirement

Message ID 20221109001328.732000-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series drm/i915/dg2: Drop force_probe requirement | expand

Commit Message

Matt Roper Nov. 9, 2022, 12:13 a.m. UTC
DG2 has been very usable for a while now, and all of the uapi changes
related to fundamental platform usage have been finalized.  Recent CI
results have also been healthy, so we're ready to drop the force_probe
requirement and enable the platform by default.

Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---

There was some recent offline discussion questioning whether we'd fully
identified the root cause of some historic CI failures, or whether it
was possible we might still have a bug lurking somewhere causing
sporadic failures.  Let's use this patch to centralize discussion about
any remaining concerns and make sure they're addressed before we apply
this.

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Tvrtko Ursulin Nov. 18, 2022, 8:29 p.m. UTC | #1
On 09/11/2022 00:13, Matt Roper wrote:
> DG2 has been very usable for a while now, and all of the uapi changes
> related to fundamental platform usage have been finalized.  Recent CI
> results have also been healthy, so we're ready to drop the force_probe
> requirement and enable the platform by default.
> 
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> There was some recent offline discussion questioning whether we'd fully
> identified the root cause of some historic CI failures, or whether it
> was possible we might still have a bug lurking somewhere causing
> sporadic failures.  Let's use this patch to centralize discussion about
> any remaining concerns and make sure they're addressed before we apply
> this.

The two main issues were analysed and I am satisfied that they are 
either very sporadic and with impact limited to i915/DG2, or sporadic 
with impact limited to a small subset of DG2 functionality. Furthermore, 
there are already fixes for both which seem most probably will be merged 
inside the 6.2 fixes window. Therefore I agree that we can proceed with 
dropping the force_probe protection. I also understand our upstream 
maintainer has acked the plan to finish up in the fixes window.

Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko

>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 1 -
>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> index 211913be40ce..0866300243aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> @@ -1078,7 +1078,6 @@ static const struct intel_device_info dg2_info = {
>   	XE_LPD_FEATURES,
>   	.__runtime.cpu_transcoder_mask = BIT(TRANSCODER_A) | BIT(TRANSCODER_B) |
>   			       BIT(TRANSCODER_C) | BIT(TRANSCODER_D),
> -	.require_force_probe = 1,
>   };
>   
>   static const struct intel_device_info ats_m_info = {
Rodrigo Vivi Nov. 18, 2022, 8:37 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 04:13:28PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> DG2 has been very usable for a while now, and all of the uapi changes
> related to fundamental platform usage have been finalized.  Recent CI
> results have also been healthy, so we're ready to drop the force_probe
> requirement and enable the platform by default.
> 
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

I'm going to merge this soon. Thanks to everyone involved.

> ---
> 
> There was some recent offline discussion questioning whether we'd fully
> identified the root cause of some historic CI failures, or whether it
> was possible we might still have a bug lurking somewhere causing
> sporadic failures.  Let's use this patch to centralize discussion about
> any remaining concerns and make sure they're addressed before we apply
> this.
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> index 211913be40ce..0866300243aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> @@ -1078,7 +1078,6 @@ static const struct intel_device_info dg2_info = {
>  	XE_LPD_FEATURES,
>  	.__runtime.cpu_transcoder_mask = BIT(TRANSCODER_A) | BIT(TRANSCODER_B) |
>  			       BIT(TRANSCODER_C) | BIT(TRANSCODER_D),
> -	.require_force_probe = 1,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct intel_device_info ats_m_info = {
> -- 
> 2.38.1
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
index 211913be40ce..0866300243aa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
@@ -1078,7 +1078,6 @@  static const struct intel_device_info dg2_info = {
 	XE_LPD_FEATURES,
 	.__runtime.cpu_transcoder_mask = BIT(TRANSCODER_A) | BIT(TRANSCODER_B) |
 			       BIT(TRANSCODER_C) | BIT(TRANSCODER_D),
-	.require_force_probe = 1,
 };
 
 static const struct intel_device_info ats_m_info = {