diff mbox series

[v8,15/22] drm/i915/vm_bind: Handle persistent vmas in execbuf3

Message ID 20221129072635.847-16-niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series drm/i915/vm_bind: Add VM_BIND functionality | expand

Commit Message

Niranjana Vishwanathapura Nov. 29, 2022, 7:26 a.m. UTC
Handle persistent (VM_BIND) mappings during the request submission
in the execbuf3 path.

v2: Ensure requests wait for bindings to complete.
v3: Remove short term pinning with PIN_VALIDATE flag.
    Individualize fences before adding to dma_resv obj.
v4: Fix bind completion check, use PIN_NOEVICT,
    use proper lock while checking if vm_rebind_list is empty.

Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
---
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer3.c   | 215 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 214 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer3.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer3.c
index 49045858a3e9..913b1f8bda9f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer3.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer3.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ 
  * Copyright © 2022 Intel Corporation
  */
 
+#include <linux/dma-fence-array.h>
 #include <linux/dma-resv.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 
@@ -19,6 +20,7 @@ 
 #include "i915_gem_vm_bind.h"
 #include "i915_trace.h"
 
+#define __EXEC3_HAS_PIN			BIT_ULL(33)
 #define __EXEC3_ENGINE_PINNED		BIT_ULL(32)
 #define __EXEC3_INTERNAL_FLAGS		(~0ull << 32)
 
@@ -42,7 +44,9 @@ 
  * execlist. Hence, no support for implicit sync.
  *
  * The new execbuf3 ioctl only works in VM_BIND mode and the VM_BIND mode only
- * works with execbuf3 ioctl for submission.
+ * works with execbuf3 ioctl for submission. All BOs mapped on that VM (through
+ * VM_BIND call) at the time of execbuf3 call are deemed required for that
+ * submission.
  *
  * The execbuf3 ioctl directly specifies the batch addresses instead of as
  * object handles as in execbuf2 ioctl. The execbuf3 ioctl will also not
@@ -58,6 +62,13 @@ 
  * So, a lot of code supporting execbuf2 ioctl, like relocations, VA evictions,
  * vma lookup table, implicit sync, vma active reference tracking etc., are not
  * applicable for execbuf3 ioctl.
+ *
+ * During each execbuf submission, request fence is added to all VM_BIND mapped
+ * objects with DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP. The DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP usage will
+ * prevent over sync (See enum dma_resv_usage). Note that DRM_I915_GEM_WAIT and
+ * DRM_I915_GEM_BUSY ioctls do not check for DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP usage and
+ * hence should not be used for end of batch check. Instead, the execbuf3
+ * timeline out fence should be used for end of batch check.
  */
 
 /**
@@ -129,6 +140,23 @@  eb_find_vma(struct i915_address_space *vm, u64 addr)
 	return i915_gem_vm_bind_lookup_vma(vm, va);
 }
 
+static void eb_scoop_unbound_vma_all(struct i915_address_space *vm)
+{
+	struct i915_vma *vma, *vn;
+
+	/**
+	 * Move all unbound vmas back into vm_bind_list so that they are
+	 * revalidated.
+	 */
+	spin_lock(&vm->vm_rebind_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, vn, &vm->vm_rebind_list, vm_rebind_link) {
+		list_del_init(&vma->vm_rebind_link);
+		if (!list_empty(&vma->vm_bind_link))
+			list_move_tail(&vma->vm_bind_link, &vm->vm_bind_list);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&vm->vm_rebind_lock);
+}
+
 static int eb_lookup_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 {
 	struct i915_vma *vma;
@@ -142,14 +170,108 @@  static int eb_lookup_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 		eb->batches[i] = vma;
 	}
 
+	eb_scoop_unbound_vma_all(eb->context->vm);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int eb_lock_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
+{
+	struct i915_address_space *vm = eb->context->vm;
+	struct i915_vma *vma;
+	int err;
+
+	err = i915_gem_object_lock(eb->context->vm->root_obj, &eb->ww);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->non_priv_vm_bind_list,
+			    non_priv_vm_bind_link) {
+		err = i915_gem_object_lock(vma->obj, &eb->ww);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void eb_release_persistent_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
+{
+	struct i915_address_space *vm = eb->context->vm;
+	struct i915_vma *vma, *vn;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&vm->vm_bind_lock);
+
+	if (!(eb->args->flags & __EXEC3_HAS_PIN))
+		return;
+
+	assert_object_held(vm->root_obj);
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, vn, &vm->vm_bind_list, vm_bind_link)
+		if (!i915_vma_verify_bind_complete(vma))
+			list_move_tail(&vma->vm_bind_link, &vm->vm_bound_list);
+
+	eb->args->flags &= ~__EXEC3_HAS_PIN;
+}
+
 static void eb_release_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 {
+	eb_release_persistent_vma_all(eb);
 	eb_unpin_engine(eb);
 }
 
+static int eb_reserve_fence_for_persistent_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
+{
+	struct i915_address_space *vm = eb->context->vm;
+	u64 num_fences = 1;
+	struct i915_vma *vma;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* Reserve enough slots to accommodate composite fences */
+	if (intel_context_is_parallel(eb->context))
+		num_fences = eb->num_batches;
+
+	ret = dma_resv_reserve_fences(vm->root_obj->base.resv, num_fences);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->non_priv_vm_bind_list,
+			    non_priv_vm_bind_link) {
+		ret = dma_resv_reserve_fences(vma->obj->base.resv, num_fences);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int eb_validate_persistent_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
+{
+	struct i915_address_space *vm = eb->context->vm;
+	struct i915_vma *vma;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&vm->vm_bind_lock);
+	assert_object_held(vm->root_obj);
+
+	ret = eb_reserve_fence_for_persistent_vma_all(eb);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->vm_bind_list, vm_bind_link) {
+		u64 pin_flags = vma->start | PIN_OFFSET_FIXED | PIN_USER |
+				PIN_VALIDATE | PIN_NOEVICT;
+
+		ret = i915_vma_pin_ww(vma, &eb->ww, 0, 0, pin_flags);
+		if (ret)
+			break;
+
+		eb->args->flags |= __EXEC3_HAS_PIN;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * Using two helper loops for the order of which requests / batches are created
  * and added the to backend. Requests are created in order from the parent to
@@ -161,13 +283,80 @@  static void eb_release_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
  */
 #define for_each_batch_create_order(_eb) \
 	for (unsigned int i = 0; i < (_eb)->num_batches; ++i)
+#define for_each_batch_add_order(_eb) \
+	for (int i = (_eb)->num_batches - 1; i >= 0; --i)
+
+static void __eb_persistent_add_shared_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
+					     struct dma_fence *fence)
+{
+	struct dma_fence *curr;
+	int idx;
+
+	dma_fence_array_for_each(curr, idx, fence)
+		dma_resv_add_fence(obj->base.resv, curr,
+				   DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP);
+
+	obj->write_domain = 0;
+	obj->read_domains |= I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS;
+	obj->mm.dirty = true;
+}
+
+static void eb_persistent_add_shared_fence(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
+{
+	struct i915_address_space *vm = eb->context->vm;
+	struct dma_fence *fence;
+	struct i915_vma *vma;
+
+	fence = eb->composite_fence ? eb->composite_fence :
+		&eb->requests[0]->fence;
+
+	__eb_persistent_add_shared_fence(vm->root_obj, fence);
+	list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->non_priv_vm_bind_list,
+			    non_priv_vm_bind_link)
+		__eb_persistent_add_shared_fence(vma->obj, fence);
+}
+
+static void eb_move_all_persistent_vma_to_active(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
+{
+	/* Add fence to BOs dma-resv fence list */
+	eb_persistent_add_shared_fence(eb);
+}
 
 static int eb_move_to_gpu(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 {
+	struct i915_address_space *vm = eb->context->vm;
+	struct i915_vma *vma;
+	int err = 0;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&vm->vm_bind_lock);
+	assert_object_held(vm->root_obj);
+
+	eb_move_all_persistent_vma_to_active(eb);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->vm_bind_list, vm_bind_link) {
+		for_each_batch_add_order(eb) {
+			if (!eb->requests[i])
+				continue;
+
+			err = i915_request_await_bind(eb->requests[i], vma);
+			if (err)
+				goto err_skip;
+		}
+	}
+
 	/* Unconditionally flush any chipset caches (for streaming writes). */
 	intel_gt_chipset_flush(eb->gt);
 
 	return 0;
+
+err_skip:
+	for_each_batch_create_order(eb) {
+		if (!eb->requests[i])
+			break;
+
+		i915_request_set_error_once(eb->requests[i], err);
+	}
+	return err;
 }
 
 static int eb_request_submit(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
@@ -482,6 +671,7 @@  i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
 
 	mutex_lock(&eb.context->vm->vm_bind_lock);
 
+lookup_vmas:
 	err = eb_lookup_vma_all(&eb);
 	if (err) {
 		eb_release_vma_all(&eb);
@@ -498,6 +688,29 @@  i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
 	/* only throttle once, even if we didn't need to throttle */
 	throttle = false;
 
+	err = eb_lock_vma_all(&eb);
+	if (err)
+		goto err_validate;
+
+	/**
+	 * No object unbinds possible once the objects are locked. So,
+	 * check for any unbinds here, which needs to be scooped up.
+	 *
+	 * XXX: Probably vm_rebind_list can be scooped in the validation
+	 * phase instead of lookup phase, after holding object locks.
+	 * Then this check won't be needed.
+	 */
+	spin_lock(&eb.context->vm->vm_rebind_lock);
+	if (!list_empty(&eb.context->vm->vm_rebind_list)) {
+		spin_unlock(&eb.context->vm->vm_rebind_lock);
+		eb_release_vma_all(&eb);
+		i915_gem_ww_ctx_fini(&eb.ww);
+		goto lookup_vmas;
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&eb.context->vm->vm_rebind_lock);
+
+	err = eb_validate_persistent_vma_all(&eb);
+
 err_validate:
 	if (err == -EDEADLK) {
 		eb_release_vma_all(&eb);